Free World RP (OOC/Sign-Ups/Open)

[Bojikami]

Hey guys, anyone wanna interact with Russia?

[Ardboe Eire]

How could B. Obama say "god bless america"?

I'm sorry I'm not American.
I'm Irish.

[Kryskov]

Nation Application

• NS Nation: Kryskov
• RP Nation: France
• Government Type: Unitary semi-presidential constitutional republic
• Leader(s): François Hollande, Jean-Marc Ayrault
• Economic Status: Powerhouse Economy (hard to define, considering everyone is in a recession)
• World Status: Superpower
• GDP: $2.253 trillion
• GDPPC: $35,520
• Population: 65,350,000
• Military Percentage: ~.8% (based on actual numbers and a basic understanding of math)
• Role-play Sample(s): http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=11645387#p11645387
  http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=11564257#p11564257

[Ardboe Eire]

Nation Application

• NS Nation: Kryskov
• RP Nation: France
• Government Type: Unitary semi-presidential constitutional republic
• Leader(s): François Hollande, Jean-Marc Ayrault
• Economic Status: Powerhouse Economy (hard to define, considering everyone is in a recession)
• World Status: Superpower
• GDP: $2.253 trillion
• GDPPC: $35,520
• Population: 65,350,000
• Military Percentage: ~.8% (based on actual numbers and a basic understanding of math)
• Role-play Sample(s): http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=11645387#p11645387
  http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=11564257#p11564257

Hi Kryskov.
Just asking and not being rude but is France actually a 'superpower'?

[Kryskov]

It's debatable, I suppose. It has a permanent UNSC seat and is a key player in NATO, plus America and the UK's connection to mainland Europe.

[Ardboe Eire]

It's debatable, I suppose. It has a permanent UNSC seat and is a key player in NATO, plus America and the UK's connection to mainland Europe.

True but I think it isn't because it wouldn't have the military hardware to keep up with the UK,US,China and Russia.

[Kryskov]

It's debatable, I suppose. It has a permanent UNSC seat and is a key player in NATO, plus America and the UK's connection to mainland Europe.

True but I think it isn't because it wouldn't have the military hardware to keep up with the UK,US,China and Russia.

It produces some of the finest weapons and equipment in the world (FAMAS, Mirage fighter). If it went up against the US, China, or Russia, it would lose solely because of numbers. It would have a pretty good chance against the UK.

[Bojikami]

True but I think it isn't because it wouldn't have the military hardware to keep up with the UK,US,China and Russia.

It produces some of the finest weapons and equipment in the world (FAMAS, Mirage fighter). If it went up against the US, China, or Russia, it would lose solely because of numbers. It would have a pretty good chance against the UK.

UK vs. France? I'd watch that.

[Ardboe Eire]

It produces some of the finest weapons and equipment in the world (FAMAS, Mirage fighter). If it went up against the US, China, or Russia, it would lose solely because of numbers. It would have a pretty good chance against the UK.

UK vs. France? I'd watch that.

I'm the US
But its the UK
For a Naval battle the French would lose to the US.

[Kryskov]

UK vs. France? I'd watch that.

I'm the US
But its the UK
For a Naval battle the French would lose to the US.

Yeah, the French navy isn't that great. It would really have to rely on planes from the mainland or the Charles De Gaulle to do most of the work. But, if you had one regiment of French and one of Americans with their standard equipment squaring off on flat ground without additional support, I believe that the outcome would be a draw or a close/Pyrrhic victory for either party.

[Ardboe Eire]

I'm the US
But its the UK
For a Naval battle the French would lose to the US.

Yeah, the French navy isn't that great. It would really have to rely on planes from the mainland or the Charles De Gaulle to do most of the work. But, if you had one regiment of French and one of Americans with their standard equipment squaring off on flat ground without additional support, I believe that the outcome would be a draw or a close/Pyrrhic victory for either party.

True.
But the US in my opinion have the best overall military in the world

[Kryskov]

I agree.

[Asasia]

It's debatable, I suppose. It has a permanent UNSC seat and is a key player in NATO, plus America and the UK's connection to mainland Europe.

True but I think it isn't because it wouldn't have the military hardware to keep up with the UK,US,China and Russia.

France has a VERY powerful Military. But don't get too carried away with what I said. I think it has the most soldiers in all of Europe, besides Russia.

[The Keystone Federation]

True but I think it isn't because it wouldn't have the military hardware to keep up with the UK,US,China and Russia.

It produces some of the finest weapons and equipment in the world (FAMAS, Mirage fighter). If it went up against the US, China, or Russia, it would lose solely because of numbers. It would have a pretty good chance against the UK.

Well, actually, most French made weapons that are mass-produced always turn out to have flaws in them. I believe that the BEST of the BEST would have to be Germany, America, or the UK

[Ardboe Eire]

It produces some of the finest weapons and equipment in the world (FAMAS, Mirage fighter). If it went up against the US, China, or Russia, it would lose solely because of numbers. It would have a pretty good chance against the UK.

Well, actually, most French made weapons that are mass-produced always turn out to have flaws in them. I believe that the BEST of the BEST would have to be Germany, America, or the UK

Will you approve Kryskov?

[Kryskov]

Well, actually, most French made weapons that are mass-produced always turn out to have flaws in them. I believe that the BEST of the BEST would have to be Germany, America, or the UK

All weapons have flaws with them. The M4 jams frequently, with the SA80, there is an argument on the reliability of the rifle in bad weather, and the Heckler & Koch G36 is too small for missions that need a powerful round. The FAMAS (just so I'm not biased) can strip a standard NATO round from the brass casing, causing the French to currently use steel-cased ammo. The FAMAS, however, is slated to be replaced in 2013 (I will likely do so with F90- A made-for-export Australian variant of the AUG).

[Ardboe Eire]

Well, actually, most French made weapons that are mass-produced always turn out to have flaws in them. I believe that the BEST of the BEST would have to be Germany, America, or the UK

All weapons have flaws with them. The M4 jams frequently, with the SA80, there is an argument on the reliability of the rifle in bad weather, and the Heckler & Koch G36 is too small for missions that need a powerful round. The FAMAS (just so I'm not biased) can strip a standard NATO round from the brass casing, causing the French to currently use steel-cased ammo. The FAMAS, however, is slated to be replaced in 2013 (I will likely do so with F90- A made-for-export Australian variant of the AUG).

Ah all but the Kalashnikov lol

[Kryskov]

The AK's accuracy has been referred to as "good enough", so not really. Additionally, it cannot support a flash hider and the only way to get a dust cover is to set the rifle to safe. The AK and it's magazines are relatively heavy, allowing for only about 420 rounds compared to the 690 that an infantry man with an M16/M4 can hold.

[Ardboe Eire]

The AK's accuracy has been referred to as "good enough", so not really. Additionally, it cannot support a flash hider and the only way to get a dust cover is to set the rifle to safe. The AK and it's magazines are relatively heavy, allowing for only about 420 rounds compared to the 690 that an infantry man with an M16/M4 can hold.

Yes BUT for the cheapness and reliability it is the BEST
No other weapon can work in the desert when filled with sand,,no other weapon can work when it is filled with mud or any other conditions.
It is in my opinion the best gun for reliability cheapness and its role in Culture.

[Kryskov]

The AK's accuracy has been referred to as "good enough", so not really. Additionally, it cannot support a flash hider and the only way to get a dust cover is to set the rifle to safe. The AK and it's magazines are relatively heavy, allowing for only about 420 rounds compared to the 690 that an infantry man with an M16/M4 can hold.

Yes BUT for the cheapness and reliability it is the BEST
No other weapon can work in the desert when filled with sand,,no other weapon can work when it is filled with mud or any other conditions.
It is in my opinion the best gun for reliability cheapness and its role in Culture.

I agree, but it is not perfect. It is cheap and reliable (the very reason why it isn't accurate), which is why many small countries and groups use it.

[Ardboe Eire]

Yes BUT for the cheapness and reliability it is the BEST
No other weapon can work in the desert when filled with sand,,no other weapon can work when it is filled with mud or any other conditions.
It is in my opinion the best gun for reliability cheapness and its role in Culture.

I agree, but it is not perfect. It is cheap and reliable (the very reason why it isn't accurate), which is why many small countries and groups use it.

Yes.
It's I'd I think the most produced Asssault rifle in history.
Over 100 million of them where built.
I love them and I would use one for the fact I don't need to clean it repeatedly.
The AK-47 is a Guerillas best friend.

[Senate and People of Rome (Ancient)]

Nation Application

[*] NS Nation: Senate and People of Rome
[*] RP Nation: The Mesopotamian Empire
[*] Government Type: Aristocratic Theocracy(Empire)
[*] Leader(s): Akkadian Ashur III
[*] Economic Status: Power house economy
[*] World Status: Second world, weak military
[*] GDP: $57,000
[*] GDPPC: $7,675,349,193,000
[*] Population: 134,655,249
[*] Military Percentage: 1%, including reserves
[*] Role-play Sample(s): I could write some, but I don't have any to link.

[Ardboe Eire]

Nation Application

[list][*] NS Nation: Senate and People of Rome
[*] RP Nation: The Mesopotamian Empire
[*] Government Type: Aristocratic Theocracy(Empire)
[*] Leader(s): Akkadian Ashur III
[*] Economic Status: Power house economy
[*] World Status: Second world, weak military
[*] GDP: $57,000
[*] GDPPC: $7,675,349,193,000
[*] Population: 134,655,249
[*] Military Percentage: 1%, including reserves
[*] Role-play Sample(s): I could write some, but I don't have any to link.

Um,real countries

[Senate and People of Rome (Ancient)]

Nation Application

[list][*] NS Nation: Senate and People of Rome
[*] RP Nation: The Mesopotamian Empire
[*] Government Type: Aristocratic Theocracy(Empire)
[*] Leader(s): Akkadian Ashur III
[*] Economic Status: Power house economy
[*] World Status: Second world, weak military
[*] GDP: $57,000
[*] GDPPC: $7,675,349,193,000
[*] Population: 134,655,249
[*] Military Percentage: 1%, including reserves
[*] Role-play Sample(s): I could write some, but I don't have any to link.

Um,real countries

Where's the point in that? this is the Portal to the Multiverse.

[Kryskov]

Where's the point in that? this is the Portal to the Multiverse.

People can set rules to their RP's as they like. This one starts with historical countries. Other RP's may have you create your own. There is not a standard to PttM, just that all RP's not having to do with your created nation go here.