2013 Modern RP (MT/OOC/Signup) OPEN!

by **Ardboe Eire** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:37 pm

Ublia wrote:
Delanshar wrote:
Be Syria lol. I'm so sick of south america right now. I actually miss mideast wars lol

And as Syria I can be a Ba'athist state? Of course though the Assads are gone replaced by newer forces within the party.

Yes do that Ublia

by **New Nassrau** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:41 pm

This RP is destroying years of Western domination and reformation on the world! ARGH

by **Ublia** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:42 pm

Ardboe Eire wrote:
Ublia wrote:
And as Syria I can be a Ba'athist state? Of course though the Assads are gone replaced by newer forces within the party.

Yes do that Ublia

And who are you RPing as?

by **The New Lowlands** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:42 pm

I wonder if I should join the West.

*looks at geographical position.*

Yep, legit.

by **Kryskov** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:43 pm

Kryskov wrote:Can I go ahead and say the fleet I assembled yesterday has arrived near Ascension?

by **Ardboe Eire** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:44 pm

Ublia wrote:
Ardboe Eire wrote:Yes do that Ublia

And who are you RPing as?

Pro-Gaddafi Libyans :lol2:

by **Delanshar** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:49 pm

Kryskov wrote:
Kryskov wrote:Can I go ahead and say the fleet I assembled yesterday has arrived near Ascension?

Maybe go to Cuba first. He opened up his docks. I'll send my Carrier Group down and from the caribbean we can head to Ascension together.

by **Bojikami** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:52 pm

Delanshar wrote:
Kryskov wrote:

Maybe go to Cuba first. He opened up his docks. I'll send my Carrier Group down and from the caribbean we can head to Ascension together.

Oh, is it ok of some small assault boats accompany you?

by **Kryskov** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:55 pm

Bojikami wrote:
Delanshar wrote:
Maybe go to Cuba first. He opened up his docks. I'll send my Carrier Group down and from the caribbean we can head to Ascension together.

Oh, is it ok of some small assault boats accompany you?

Not sure they could make the trip. I plan to save all of the stored fuel for the coalition fleet.

by **Minnysota** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:55 pm

Wow; Delanshar was the first person to account for mobilization and logistics. :/

You all could learn a lesson from him.

by **Minnysota** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:58 pm

Delanshar wrote:
They'd be totally reliant on Brazil's moderate naval capacity.

Moderate is a bit of a stretch here.

by **Kryskov** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:58 pm

Minnysota wrote:Wow; Delanshar was the first person to account for mobilization and logistics. :/

You all could learn a lesson from him.

I have been sending a fleet because of logistics for days >:(

by **Bojikami** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:58 pm

Kryskov wrote:
Bojikami wrote:Oh, is it ok of some small assault boats accompany you?

Not sure they could make the trip. I plan to save all of the stored fuel for the coalition fleet.

Then I might send the cruisers. They can make the trip.

by **Ublia** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:58 pm

Ardboe Eire wrote:
Ublia wrote:

And who are you RPing as?

Pro-Gaddafi Libyans

Smart choice go Socialism!

by **Minnysota** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:59 pm

New Nassrau wrote:Well, that was a fast revolution... besides, Pro-Gadaffi's are practically gone right? Aren't we going for realism in this RP?

Obviously, realism has been widely ignored.

by **Bojikami** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:00 pm

Ublia wrote:
Ardboe Eire wrote:Pro-Gaddafi Libyans

Smart choice go Socialism!

Cuba will urge that Libya go socialist/communist.

by **Minnysota** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:00 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Well, it's the only way that you're going to get a peacefull return of the islands - agree to turn them over to a neutal third party that keeps the island a DMZ and not be bullied into handing them back.

Brazil? Trying to give the US an ultimatum for peace? When it doesn't involve defending their mainland? Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool. Good luck.

by **Minnysota** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:01 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
That wouldn't make any difference. In the '83 conflict, there was a reason why nobody came to give the British outright assistance, at least in the European sphere. Even if the navies aren't operating under the NATO flag, you have Britian, supported by other counties who happen to be members of NATO, fighting a war half-a-world away. THAT sents a dangerous precident that the world doesn't want to see.

If it was a bullshit war, sure. The British and allies are fighting to protect British land.

by **Minnysota** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:03 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
I got the idea from the occupation of Goa, actually.

You have to admit, it does rather nicely present a grim choice to the other side. They can either accept the slight demands and enter into talks, in which case they get their island back, or they can refuse, spend months reducing the island, all the while the Falklands conflict grinds to a halt with UK/NATO supply chains grinding to a halt.

Or, they can wait until the US comes to stop Brazil and Argentina's blatant warmongering that obviously won't be stopped by anything short of a superpower putting them in their place.

by **Minnysota** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:04 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:With the island and the Brazilian Navy, pretty much anything less that a carrier battlefleet would be sure of winnings its way through, and I plan to turn the island into Iwo Jima, but with missiles.

You really have no idea how logistics work, do you?

by **Ardboe Eire** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:04 pm

Bojikami wrote:
Ublia wrote:
Smart choice go Socialism!

Cuba will urge that Libya go socialist/communist.

We are leaning Socialism.

by **Minnysota** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:04 pm

Kryskov wrote:I have been sending a fleet because of logistics for days

Good man.

by **Bojikami** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:05 pm

Ardboe Eire wrote:
Bojikami wrote:Cuba will urge that Libya go socialist/communist.

We are leaning Socialism.

Good.

by **Ardboe Eire** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:06 pm

Minnysota wrote:
New Nassrau wrote:Well, that was a fast revolution... besides, Pro-Gadaffi's are practically gone right? Aren't we going for realism in this RP?

Obviously, realism has been widely ignored.

I edited it to make it more 'realistic'.
By attacking Sirte instead of Tripoli.

by **Minnysota** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:12 pm

Ardboe Eire wrote:I edited it to make it more 'realistic'.
By attacking Sirte instead of Tripoli.

I wasn't referencing to you. Realism has been/was widely ignored in the South American theater.

2013 Modern RP (MT/OOC/Signup) OPEN!

Who is online