But this presumably has the armament of a provincial Devon police station.
Advertisement

by Patricant » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:41 pm

by Soviet Ruk-Tsan » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:43 pm

by Bojikami » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:43 pm
Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:Getting pretty tired of the shit in the Falklands, but I bet NATO doesn't want my help

by Delanshar » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:44 pm

by Machtergreifung » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:45 pm


by Machtergreifung » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:48 pm

by Delanshar » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:50 pm

by Kryskov » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:50 pm
Machtergreifung wrote:Also Kryskov, what are your intensions regarding Ascension Island? Surrender or do I have to enter into a do or die battle with the few hundred aircraft mechanics that are on the island?

by Machtergreifung » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:53 pm
Kryskov wrote:Machtergreifung wrote:Also Kryskov, what are your intensions regarding Ascension Island? Surrender or do I have to enter into a do or die battle with the few hundred aircraft mechanics that are on the island?
Tough call. I don't really want to just loose the island. Plus, the mechanics are really insignificant. But I do agree with Minny that I don't think sneaking a task force near an island, especially one with radar, is easy.
@ Delanshar Out of how many attacking?
by Minnysota » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:58 pm
Machtergreifung wrote:
By nightfall on Brasilia, a plan was in place. One team would set to work copying the design of the Eurofighter for Brazilian use, making any improvements that it would need for operating in the South Atlantic theater, while another team would work designing a version of the fighter to be deployed from the carrier Sao Paulo and the third team would co-ordinate with the Brazilian industrial sector to ensure that the parts were available so that the aircraft could be totaly home produced. By the next morning, de Silva was presented with a timetable. A working prototype copy of the Eurofighter in two months, a strong final design in five months, with production starting in six months time, with the carrier version coming at least a month following that.

by Delanshar » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:59 pm
Kryskov wrote:Machtergreifung wrote:Also Kryskov, what are your intensions regarding Ascension Island? Surrender or do I have to enter into a do or die battle with the few hundred aircraft mechanics that are on the island?
Tough call. I don't really want to just loose the island. Plus, the mechanics are really insignificant. But I do agree with Minny that I don't think sneaking a task force near an island, especially one with radar, is easy.
@ Delanshar Out of how many attacking?

by Patricant » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:02 pm

by New Ecopia » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:07 pm
Patricant wrote:Would anyone object if Nigeria builds its own automatic rifles, in addition to utilizing our Chinese and Russian-made ones.
Delanshar wrote:Revised for SAMs
First roll: Argentine strike on Falklands
0-10: Strikes do major damage, but significant amount of planes intercepted/shot down
10-15: Strikes do major damage, and few planes intercepted/shot down
15-40: Strikes do moderate damage, and significant amount of planes intercepted/shot down
40-55: Strikes do moderate, but few planes intercepted/shot down
55-70: Strikes do mild damage, and few planes intercepted/shot down
70-100: Strikes do mild damage, but significant amount of planes intercepted/shot down
Better?
by Minnysota » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:08 pm
Patricant wrote:Would anyone object if Nigeria builds its own automatic rifles, in addition to utilizing our Chinese and Russian-made ones.

by Generic Socialist Country » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:10 pm

by Parhe » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:11 pm

by Machtergreifung » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:11 pm
Minnysota wrote:*wonders why no one has called out Brazil on his ridiculous fighter time frame and the bullshit that is his blockade of Ascension*Machtergreifung wrote:
By nightfall on Brasilia, a plan was in place. One team would set to work copying the design of the Eurofighter for Brazilian use, making any improvements that it would need for operating in the South Atlantic theater, while another team would work designing a version of the fighter to be deployed from the carrier Sao Paulo and the third team would co-ordinate with the Brazilian industrial sector to ensure that the parts were available so that the aircraft could be totaly home produced. By the next morning, de Silva was presented with a timetable. A working prototype copy of the Eurofighter in two months, a strong final design in five months, with production starting in six months time, with the carrier version coming at least a month following that.
Emphasis mine.

by Machtergreifung » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:12 pm
Generic Socialist Country wrote:Machtergreifung wrote:
Certainaly, but it's a non-entity in trying to take the island, the demands were made of the governing body of the Island (Britain), so America really has no say provided I don't carpet bomb the base.
That wouldn't stop the US from declaring war, at least not the real US.
If you spat on the Presidents shoes they'd declare war, especially if they don't approve of your government.

by New Ecopia » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:13 pm
Parhe wrote:I guess math is not my strongpoint but if we average out three rolls are not the numbers closer to the center 50 more likely to occur, or is it my faulty math logic, or is it already taken in to account?
Delanshar wrote:Revised for SAMs
First roll: Argentine strike on Falklands
0-10: Strikes do major damage, but significant amount of planes intercepted/shot down
10-15: Strikes do major damage, and few planes intercepted/shot down
15-40: Strikes do moderate damage, and significant amount of planes intercepted/shot down
40-55: Strikes do moderate, but few planes intercepted/shot down
55-70: Strikes do mild damage, and few planes intercepted/shot down
70-100: Strikes do mild damage, but significant amount of planes intercepted/shot down
Better?

by Patricant » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:14 pm
by Minnysota » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:15 pm
Machtergreifung wrote:Seeing as I can't copypasta the Eurofighter, I've changed it to the Gripen. I fail to see your point, if you have a team of engineers working to figure out how a aircraft works and how to make another aircraft to work the same way, you're cutting years of development. Yes, it won't be as good as the original, but you're not having to reinvent the wheel...

by New Ecopia » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:16 pm
Minnysota wrote:Machtergreifung wrote:Seeing as I can't copypasta the Eurofighter, I've changed it to the Gripen. I fail to see your point, if you have a team of engineers working to figure out how a aircraft works and how to make another aircraft to work the same way, you're cutting years of development. Yes, it won't be as good as the original, but you're not having to reinvent the wheel...
No; your time frame is ridiculous even if you've just bullshitted a copy of a fighter. Two months for a prototype is horseshit in itself, but a production-ready model in sixth months is borderline godmod.
Delanshar wrote:Revised for SAMs
First roll: Argentine strike on Falklands
0-10: Strikes do major damage, but significant amount of planes intercepted/shot down
10-15: Strikes do major damage, and few planes intercepted/shot down
15-40: Strikes do moderate damage, and significant amount of planes intercepted/shot down
40-55: Strikes do moderate, but few planes intercepted/shot down
55-70: Strikes do mild damage, and few planes intercepted/shot down
70-100: Strikes do mild damage, but significant amount of planes intercepted/shot down
Better?

by Delanshar » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:17 pm
Parhe wrote:I guess math is not my strongpoint but if we average out three rolls are not the numbers closer to the center 50 more likely to occur, or is it my faulty math logic, or is it already taken in to account?

by Machtergreifung » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:17 pm
Minnysota wrote:Machtergreifung wrote:Seeing as I can't copypasta the Eurofighter, I've changed it to the Gripen. I fail to see your point, if you have a team of engineers working to figure out how a aircraft works and how to make another aircraft to work the same way, you're cutting years of development. Yes, it won't be as good as the original, but you're not having to reinvent the wheel...
No; your time frame is ridiculous even if you've just bullshitted a copy of a fighter. Two months for a prototype is horseshit in itself, but a production-ready model in sixth months is borderline godmod.
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Saxony-Brandenburg
Advertisement