Advertisement

by The Nuclear Fist » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:32 pm
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:34 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:That genocide of Belgians in France sounds fine, TUSSR. Any idea when we can expect the OP?

by Unicario » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:34 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:That genocide of Belgians in France sounds fine, TUSSR. Any idea when we can expect the OP?

by The Nuclear Fist » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:34 pm
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by The Nuclear Fist » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:35 pm
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by The Nuclear Fist » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:36 pm
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:37 pm

by Neros » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:38 pm

by The Nuclear Fist » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:38 pm
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Oh. Probobly 1-3 days. Also how long do you want posts to be in the thread? I generally post 1-3 paragraphs, usually 2, in a RP but if you want that lower or higher I can do that.
Flanders as in Flanders from the Simpsons being massacred.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:52 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Oh. Probobly 1-3 days. Also how long do you want posts to be in the thread? I generally post 1-3 paragraphs, usually 2, in a RP but if you want that lower or higher I can do that.
Post whatever you're comfortable with, but please make sure to detail where, when, and how you're attacking, and with what number of troops.Flanders as in Flanders from the Simpsons being massacred.
I've never seen the Simpsons.
Comedy Heathen!
by The Nuclear Fist » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:54 pm
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:And thank God. I usually post good detail, I post how I'm attacking and when and with how many troops.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:56 pm

by Costa Fiero » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:56 pm
Neros wrote:I don't think you've had Trieste, as Serbia had risen fairly early since there was never any Ottoman Rule. Yugoslav (same as Greater Serbia, they're interchangeable) is fairly industrialized and has a rather well-equipped army unlike their WW1 counterparts. Plus, Austria rules your entire Northern part, so your beef would first be with them before you even reach Yugoslav Trieste.

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:58 pm
Costa Fiero wrote:Neros wrote:I don't think you've had Trieste, as Serbia had risen fairly early since there was never any Ottoman Rule. Yugoslav (same as Greater Serbia, they're interchangeable) is fairly industrialized and has a rather well-equipped army unlike their WW1 counterparts. Plus, Austria rules your entire Northern part, so your beef would first be with them before you even reach Yugoslav Trieste.
That's not what the Italians think. And anyway, we should team up and pick on Austria.

by Neros » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:02 pm
Costa Fiero wrote:Neros wrote:I don't think you've had Trieste, as Serbia had risen fairly early since there was never any Ottoman Rule. Yugoslav (same as Greater Serbia, they're interchangeable) is fairly industrialized and has a rather well-equipped army unlike their WW1 counterparts. Plus, Austria rules your entire Northern part, so your beef would first be with them before you even reach Yugoslav Trieste.
That's not what the Italians think. And anyway, we should team up and pick on Austria.

by Carathon » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:04 pm
Costa Fiero wrote:Neros wrote:I don't think you've had Trieste, as Serbia had risen fairly early since there was never any Ottoman Rule. Yugoslav (same as Greater Serbia, they're interchangeable) is fairly industrialized and has a rather well-equipped army unlike their WW1 counterparts. Plus, Austria rules your entire Northern part, so your beef would first be with them before you even reach Yugoslav Trieste.
That's not what the Italians think. And anyway, we should team up and pick on Austria.

by Geradin Empire » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:06 pm

by Andonam » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:10 pm

by Geradin Empire » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:13 pm

by Costa Fiero » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:15 pm
Try to get past all the rivers and mountains while constantly being overpowered by our superior fire power doctrine while we have the better supply networks. Your Italy, right?
Neros wrote:*recalls the Triple Alliance of World War 1 and the Italians' Turncoat*
...I don't know man, I just don't know. I'm all for a peace agreement and stuff, but I know for a fact that both Serbia and Italy will act within their own interests. Plus, do you want to attack a nation that's main land area is the Swiss Alps? I kinda don't due to the logistical reasons and that the Austrians will be at every advantage while we just throw soldiers into the meat grinder.
Of course, the reasons for Italy not going with the Triple Alliance is well understood and pretty much makes sense regardless.

by Neros » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:15 pm
Andonam wrote:Idea: More IC.
Geradin Empire wrote:By they way, any of you Eastern/Central/Southern European countries want to get some Hispano-Suiza industry going on in your nation? This version of RP, I've got a feeling it will do a little bit more than make cars and airplane engines early on.

by Carathon » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:18 pm
Costa Fiero wrote:
Why not? What's the worst they could do? The Italians were somewhat successful in most of their battles against the Austro-Hungarians and Germans . They only lost at Caporetto because of superior German tactics (which was also the same tactics used to great effect on the Western Front as well).Try to get past all the rivers and mountains while constantly being overpowered by our superior fire power doctrine while we have the better supply networks. Your Italy, right?
Si. And overpowered? I doubt it. Remember, at the onset of the Italian campaign IRL, the Italian Army outnumbered the Austro-Hungarian Army 3-1. And you also occupy northern Italy, so it is mostly low hills , unlike in the mountainous terrain the IRL campaign was actually fought in.Neros wrote:*recalls the Triple Alliance of World War 1 and the Italians' Turncoat*
...I don't know man, I just don't know. I'm all for a peace agreement and stuff, but I know for a fact that both Serbia and Italy will act within their own interests. Plus, do you want to attack a nation that's main land area is the Swiss Alps? I kinda don't due to the logistical reasons and that the Austrians will be at every advantage while we just throw soldiers into the meat grinder.
Of course, the reasons for Italy not going with the Triple Alliance is well understood and pretty much makes sense regardless.
Thing is, we only want the flatter lands which they occupy in the north of the country, which is basically low hills and other farmland, as in the countryside around Milan.

by Geradin Empire » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:19 pm
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Dragos Bee, Tesserach
Advertisement