NationStates

Slanderous? Your RMB posting on Communist International League, your threats made to Soviet Union which can also be verified. Your occupation of a right wing region and turning it into a kommisariat, proven. All the things here have been proven, the only thing that is the resisting element is whether or not the WA can do this. Several people have said they can't but don't act like your blank smells like roses.

The Freeturf wrote:apologies mod. I did not no which one to use and due to the volume of threads related to this did not wish to create another

Well I've explicitly told you that you should start a new thread for your proposal, so I don't see what the problem is. This post of yours completely ignores my instructions:

The Freeturf wrote:nations should not have to leave the occupied regions they love to call home! CONDEMN THE REGION! APPROVE THE PROPOSAL CURRENTLY ON THE FLOOR OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL

Start a new thread for your proposal if you want to promote it on the forums.

St George of England wrote:Ambassador, you have misunderstood what condemnations are for. Unless some evidence is provided, evidence that is proof of wrong doing and not proof of their ideology, condemning them only serves to repeat the Nazi Europe debacle all over again. Because we will be condemning them for their ideology. I myself would find non-monarchist democracies abhorrent, but I have not drafted a condemnation of Separate Vermont, Fatatuttutti or any number of other democracies.

I'm tired of repeating this.
I AM NOT TRYING TO CONDEMN THE GREATER GERMAN REICH BASED ON THEIR IDEOLOGY!!!
As for other proof, they're ban crazy, so my attempts to collect proof haven't turned up much.

I wonder why it is that most people would not go near the security council forum with a ten foot pole?

Sedgistan wrote:

The Freeturf wrote:apologies mod. I did not no which one to use and due to the volume of threads related to this did not wish to create another

Well I've explicitly told you that you should start a new thread for your proposal, so I don't see what the problem is. This post of yours completely ignores my instructions:

The Freeturf wrote:nations should not have to leave the occupied regions they love to call home! CONDEMN THE REGION! APPROVE THE PROPOSAL CURRENTLY ON THE FLOOR OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL

Start a new thread for your proposal if you want to promote it on the forums.

Mod the motion this forum is currently talking about is dead. I thought you said I could discuss it hear.

However before I speak again I will setup a new thread

Saigonsin wrote:(Assuming that percentage is real.)And that gives YOU the right to raid them? I'm pretty sure that's the goal of your raids anyway.
Also, USE SPELL CHECK, PLEASE.

Unfortunately, all spell check does is catch words that are misspelled (and not necessarily when it is an actual word - ie: their, they're, there). I've been called a spelling and grammar nazi before. haha....haha....hahahaha. That's too funny considering what region we are discussing here.

Saigonsin wrote:I've been trying to rally support for such action, but no one seems to want to.

Way back when (about 6 years ago), that's what a group of us did in the MT Army. Unfortunately they aren't active anymore, otherwise there would still be raids of regions such as this. However, for us, it WAS an act against their ideology.

Flemingovia wrote:I wonder why it is that most people would not go near the security council forum with a ten foot pole?

*presents flowers to Flemingovia for his wry observation*