NATION

PASSWORD

Condemn The Greater German Reich (again)

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Cuba Socialista
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Nov 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Cuba Socialista » Sat Jan 15, 2011 6:55 pm

Slanderous? Your RMB posting on Communist International League, your threats made to Soviet Union which can also be verified. Your occupation of a right wing region and turning it into a kommisariat, proven. All the things here have been proven, the only thing that is the resisting element is whether or not the WA can do this. Several people have said they can't but don't act like your blank smells like roses.

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35487
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Sat Jan 15, 2011 8:45 pm

The Freeturf wrote:apologies mod. I did not no which one to use and due to the volume of threads related to this did not wish to create another

Well I've explicitly told you that you should start a new thread for your proposal, so I don't see what the problem is. This post of yours completely ignores my instructions:
The Freeturf wrote:nations should not have to leave the occupied regions they love to call home! CONDEMN THE REGION! APPROVE THE PROPOSAL CURRENTLY ON THE FLOOR OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL

Start a new thread for your proposal if you want to promote it on the forums.

User avatar
Saigonsin
Attaché
 
Posts: 97
Founded: Dec 05, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Saigonsin » Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:50 am

St George of England wrote:Ambassador, you have misunderstood what condemnations are for. Unless some evidence is provided, evidence that is proof of wrong doing and not proof of their ideology, condemning them only serves to repeat the Nazi Europe debacle all over again. Because we will be condemning them for their ideology. I myself would find non-monarchist democracies abhorrent, but I have not drafted a condemnation of Separate Vermont, Fatatuttutti or any number of other democracies.

I'm tired of repeating this.
I AM NOT TRYING TO CONDEMN THE GREATER GERMAN REICH BASED ON THEIR IDEOLOGY!!!
As for other proof, they're ban crazy, so my attempts to collect proof haven't turned up much.
Last edited by Saigonsin on Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Parkus Empire wrote:
Meryuma wrote:I'm an autistic teenage bisexual anarchist Taoist atheist.

Could have just said "teenager".


"Depression breeds depression, effort breeds success."

"Anyone can give up, it’s the easiest thing in the world to do. But to hold it together when everyone else would understand if you fell apart, that’s true strength"

"Success will come to you in direct proportion to the number of times you are willing to risk failure"

"Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, you should never wish to do less. "
Robert E. Lee

User avatar
Flemingovia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 474
Founded: Dec 22, 2003
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Flemingovia » Sun Jan 16, 2011 2:31 am

I wonder why it is that most people would not go near the security council forum with a ten foot pole? ;)
IMPORTANT: Before reading this post please read the terms and conditions below. By accessing this post you signify your acceptance, full and in part, of those terms and conditions:

http://img808.imageshack.us/i/disclaimer.jpg/

User avatar
The Freeturf
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Dec 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Freeturf » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:09 am

Sedgistan wrote:
The Freeturf wrote:apologies mod. I did not no which one to use and due to the volume of threads related to this did not wish to create another

Well I've explicitly told you that you should start a new thread for your proposal, so I don't see what the problem is. This post of yours completely ignores my instructions:
The Freeturf wrote:nations should not have to leave the occupied regions they love to call home! CONDEMN THE REGION! APPROVE THE PROPOSAL CURRENTLY ON THE FLOOR OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL

Start a new thread for your proposal if you want to promote it on the forums.


Mod the motion this forum is currently talking about is dead. I thought you said I could discuss it hear.

However before I speak again I will setup a new thread

User avatar
Glugs
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Mar 06, 2005
New York Times Democracy

Postby Glugs » Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:05 am

Saigonsin wrote:(Assuming that percentage is real.)And that gives YOU the right to raid them? I'm pretty sure that's the goal of your raids anyway.
Also, USE SPELL CHECK, PLEASE.


Unfortunately, all spell check does is catch words that are misspelled (and not necessarily when it is an actual word - ie: their, they're, there). I've been called a spelling and grammar nazi before. haha....haha....hahahaha. That's too funny considering what region we are discussing here. :rofl:

Saigonsin wrote:I've been trying to rally support for such action, but no one seems to want to.

Way back when (about 6 years ago), that's what a group of us did in the MT Army. Unfortunately they aren't active anymore, otherwise there would still be raids of regions such as this. However, for us, it WAS an act against their ideology. :p

User avatar
TheThanksgiving Turkey
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: Mar 27, 2009
Capitalist Paradise

Postby TheThanksgiving Turkey » Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:29 pm

Flemingovia wrote:I wonder why it is that most people would not go near the security council forum with a ten foot pole? ;)


*presents flowers to Flemingovia for his wry observation* 8)

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kavagrad

Advertisement

Remove ads