by Saddams Kuwait » Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:53 pm
by Flemingovia » Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:03 pm
by Monikian WA Mission » Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:15 pm
by Laos Refugees » Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:28 pm
Flemingovia wrote:.
by Mallorea and Riva » Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:34 pm
by Flemingovia » Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:34 pm
by Pythria » Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:37 pm
by Saddams Kuwait » Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:32 pm
Mallorea and Riva wrote::palm:
This cuts the likelihood of the repeal passing by half.
This should have been drafted. You present no examples, testimony, or any proof. And simply being stoic is not worthy of a commendation. If it was then we would all be worthy of them for being stoic in the face of oppression at different times.
by Flemingovia » Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:03 am
by Mallorea and Riva » Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:31 am
by Ballotonia » Fri Nov 19, 2010 2:50 am
Agreeing that merely advancing the cause of Nazism through speech rather than actions is not inappropriate;
by Rezavid » Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:36 am
by Meekinos » Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:45 am
by Flemingovia » Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:09 am
by Kryozerkia » Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:19 am
Flemingovia wrote:I think it only fair to Saddam Kuwait to assume that this is a serious commendation until we see actual evidence to the contrary. Therefore I would ask SK how Nazi Europe have defended free speech for us all? Is it simply by existing, or were you thinking of a specific action of theirs?
by The Republic of Lanos » Fri Nov 19, 2010 2:01 pm
Kryozerkia wrote:Flemingovia wrote:I think it only fair to Saddam Kuwait to assume that this is a serious commendation until we see actual evidence to the contrary. Therefore I would ask SK how Nazi Europe have defended free speech for us all? Is it simply by existing, or were you thinking of a specific action of theirs?
Evidence or links demonstrating would help the development of the proposal. Which is why proposals like Condemn Great Nepal are able to stand up under pressure. Links and evidence was provided; it demonstrated why the actions should be condemned.
by Zoerb » Fri Nov 19, 2010 2:10 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:I do recall one rumor: if a condemned region or nation were to be commended as well, would the great Max Barry resurrect himself and taketh away the WA with a colossal fireball of extra-dimensional inanity?
by Sedgistan » Fri Nov 19, 2010 2:16 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:I do recall one rumor: if a condemned region or nation were to be commended as well, would the great Max Barry resurrect himself and taketh away the WA with a colossal fireball of extra-dimensional inanity?
Ardchoille wrote:It is my happy duty to point out, with gleeful nastiness, that when Max Himself discussed the possibility of a nation being both Commended and Condemned, he nodded his august head, said a meaningful word -- I think it was "meh" -- and opined that it was possible without breaking anything.
by Darenjo » Fri Nov 19, 2010 2:20 pm
by Bears Armed » Fri Nov 19, 2010 2:57 pm
Flemingovia wrote:I am no great expert on SC resolutions, but isn't this a bit vague?
by Flemingovia » Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:50 pm
This cuts the likelihood of the repeal passing by half.
You've effectively crippled our delegation's efforts to rally support
Well, goodbye any chances of the at-vote repeal passing,
by Meekinos » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:10 pm
Flemingovia wrote:This cuts the likelihood of the repeal passing by half.You've effectively crippled our delegation's efforts to rally supportWell, goodbye any chances of the at-vote repeal passing,
if the repeal was so shaky that this poor attempt at a commend has blown its chances, then it never deserved to pass.
by Umbra Ac Silentium » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:18 pm
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.
by Saddams Kuwait » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:36 pm
Meekinos wrote:Flemingovia wrote:
if the repeal was so shaky that this poor attempt at a commend has blown its chances, then it never deserved to pass.
No because it's just plain in bad taste. Especially since the repeal thread has mentions of a potential replacement condemnation, which would focus on actual acts committed by the region. It also makes it appear as though the repeal is supporting the commendation when in fact it isn't. It creates false impression and was badly timed; we wonder if it wasn't done on purpose to detract from our actual argument. It flies in the face of what we're trying to accomplish. We want to erase the mistakes of commending the advancement of any ideology and the condemnation of any ideology. We want a world were we commend great acts of heroism and peace; where we condemn malevolent actions.
by Durkadurkiranistan II » Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:06 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Antomoron, Pentrocy, The Sapientia, Torregal
Advertisement