Discussion of SC Compendium

[Sedgistan]

Who will I complain to about the mod tyranny now?

No-one. Resistance is futile.

I've updated the part we've been discussing to read:

The action that a resolution does (condemning, commending, liberating or repealing) does not have to be attributed to any body - however, if it is, it must be attributed to an appropriate authority - ie. the World Assembly or The Security Council (the former is preferred). A proposal cannot have "Sedgistan Hereby Condemns Unibot" as its operative clause.

I'll clear out the spammy chat in a day or two providing there are no further comments.

[Todd McCloud]

And now I've seen everything...

[Bears Armed]

And now I've seen everything...

Oh? Have you seen an elephant fly?

^_^

[Metania]

A slight suggestion I thought of, might be noting what the legality of mentioning Rulers are as far as Rule 4 goes. I think I saw Ard give a ruling with that in the topic where we were all discussing it, but it could probably use being put in the compendium.

[Topid]

But how could you join the Dark Side? Who will I complain to about the mod tyranny now?

And I am here for what?

Oh, Sedge, how missed your reasonableness will be.
(This was 1/3 a joke.)

[Sedgistan]

A slight suggestion I thought of, might be noting what the legality of mentioning Rulers are as far as Rule 4 goes. I think I saw Ard give a ruling with that in the topic where we were all discussing it, but it could probably use being put in the compendium.

Added it earlier today:

RPed Characters - mention of in proposals:
RPed Characters can be mentioned in proposals, and gender appropriate personal pronouns can be used when referring to them. With one-person nations, the text of the resolution must make clear when it is referring to the nation and when it is referring to the person. RPed characters cited in resolutions cannot be claimed to have done anything which an RPed person cannot do (see here and here).

[Metania]

Whoops. Good work, then.