NATION

PASSWORD

Condemn Durkadurkiranistan II

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Reseda Island
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 394
Founded: Mar 13, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Condemn Durkadurkiranistan II

Postby Reseda Island » Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:59 pm

it has to be done, for obvious reasons.
"Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it." -RFK June 5th 1968

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35471
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:01 pm

You could talk to TannerFrankLand about combining it with his condemnation from last time around, which was only thwarted by the original Durkadurkiranistan being deleted.

User avatar
Novaya Zemlja
Secretary
 
Posts: 34
Founded: Mar 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Novaya Zemlja » Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:04 pm

Since you didn't bother to actually write a proposal, I'll write one for you.
Condemn Durkadurkiranistan II

OBSERVING that Durkadurkiranistan II ejected 534 nations from The North Pacific,

REALIZING that this is nothing compared to his previous ejection spree of 1900 nations,

IGNORING the fact that this proposal violates Rule 4,

OVERLOOKING the crappiness of this proposal,

CONDEMNS Durkadurkiranistan II.

User avatar
Vocal Public
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 107
Founded: Jun 06, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vocal Public » Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:09 pm

Condemn him? Durkadurkiranistan II should be Commended.

He has ejected newly created nations, he is allowed by the Influence Rules to do that without any reason or cause. He heeds only enough influence, nothing more. Kroll began by Ban/jecting Regional Recruiters , for posting Legal Recruiting RMB posts, completely within the Influence rules.

Durkadurkiranistan II is rightfully using the influence rules to eject Newly Created nations without regard. He should be Commended for he accomplished his goals completely within the rules.

User avatar
Reseda Island
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 394
Founded: Mar 13, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Reseda Island » Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:11 pm

Sedgistan wrote:You could talk to TannerFrankLand about combining it with his condemnation from last time around, which was only thwarted by the original Durkadurkiranistan being deleted.


I think I'll have to listen to you for once
"Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it." -RFK June 5th 1968

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:35 pm

The Security Council,

INFORMING ministers, diplomats and envoys of the Security Council that on 2010 March 02, the delegate of the North Pacific, Durkadurkiranistan ejected an excess of @@@@ nations from his region,

ASSERTING that World Assembly Delegates have the right to use their power to eject nations from a region,

FURTHER ASSERTING that Delegates have the responsibility to use that power sparingly or otherwise exclusively for ejection targets that have been deemed to 'deserve' it for whatever reason,

OBSERVING Durkadurkiranistan’s term as delegate was coming to an end on 2010 March 02 and was to be replaced by New Kervoskia,

SHOCKED by Durkadurkiranistan’s ejection of @@@@ nations from The North Pacific, the largest mass ejection in NationStates history for the sake of a 'grand finale' according to the region's World Factbook Entry,

RECOGNIZING that the original Durkadurkiranistani threat to world peace was suppressed with secretariat influence -- this suppression established a false sense of security,

NOTING that on 2010 October 14, the Durkadurkiranistan regime reemerged and declared the creation of a North Pacific Provisional Authority in response to Flemingovia's recent success in the North Pacific Delegate Election (with 17 votes),

UNDERSTANDING that the Durkadurkiranistan regime has also imposed "Project Purge", where another mass ejection of approximatively @@@@ nations is projected,

FURTHER UNDERSTANDING that the North Pacific Provisional Authority does have commendable goals such as facilitating a larger, more open election in the near future (hence the name, "provisional" authority),

BELIEVING that a condemnation of Durkadurkiranistan would serve as..
(a) a deterrent for other delegates from spontaneously ejecting large masses of nations in "purges",
(b) a remonstration to any nefarious intentions that the North Pacific Provisional Authority may have,

HEREBY CONDEMNS the Durkadurkiranistan regime.
Last edited by Unibot on Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
A mean old man
Senator
 
Posts: 4386
Founded: Jun 27, 2008
Father Knows Best State

Postby A mean old man » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:22 pm

Durk is pretty damn hilarious. What he manages to get away with doesn't speak very highly of the organization of his region, though.
A: SC#16 - Repeal "Liberate The Security Council"
A: SC#26 - Commend The Joint Systems Alliance
A: SC#30 - Commend 10000 Islands
A: SC#37 - Condemn NAZI EUROPE
A: SC#38 - Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"
A: GA#149 - On Expiration Dates
C: SC#58 - Repeal "Commend Sedgistan"
A: SC#62 - Repeal "Condemn Swarmlandia"
C: SC#63 - Commend Ballotonia
A: SC#65 - Condemn Punk Reloaded
C: GA#163 - Repeal "Law of the Sea"
A: SC#72 - Repeal "Commend Mikeswill"
C: SC#74 - Condemn Lone Wolves United
C: SC#76 - Repeal "Condemn Thatcherton"
A: SC#81 - Repeal "Condemn Anthony Delasanta"
C: SC#83 - Condemn Automagfreek
C: SC#84 - Repeal "Liberate Islam"
C: SC#111 - Commend Krulltopia ← please forget

User avatar
Reseda Island
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 394
Founded: Mar 13, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Reseda Island » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:34 pm

A mean old man wrote:Durk is pretty damn hilarious. What he manages to get away with doesn't speak very highly of the organization of his region, though.

and its corrupt that durk takes advantage of the situation.
"Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it." -RFK June 5th 1968

User avatar
A mean old man
Senator
 
Posts: 4386
Founded: Jun 27, 2008
Father Knows Best State

Postby A mean old man » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:39 pm

Reseda Island wrote:
A mean old man wrote:Durk is pretty damn hilarious. What he manages to get away with doesn't speak very highly of the organization of his region, though.

and its corrupt that durk takes advantage of the situation.

Correct. Which means TNP is in dire need of governmental and social reform, under the guiding hand of an administration native to the feeders and which understands how to keep feeders secure and stable in the face of widespread opposition which wishes to abuse what the feeder has to offer it.

EDIT: Although, now that I look at it closer, it seems Durk's up to something much larger than the usual purge. This should prove to be very interesting. I'm going to have to look into this.
Last edited by A mean old man on Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
A: SC#16 - Repeal "Liberate The Security Council"
A: SC#26 - Commend The Joint Systems Alliance
A: SC#30 - Commend 10000 Islands
A: SC#37 - Condemn NAZI EUROPE
A: SC#38 - Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"
A: GA#149 - On Expiration Dates
C: SC#58 - Repeal "Commend Sedgistan"
A: SC#62 - Repeal "Condemn Swarmlandia"
C: SC#63 - Commend Ballotonia
A: SC#65 - Condemn Punk Reloaded
C: GA#163 - Repeal "Law of the Sea"
A: SC#72 - Repeal "Commend Mikeswill"
C: SC#74 - Condemn Lone Wolves United
C: SC#76 - Repeal "Condemn Thatcherton"
A: SC#81 - Repeal "Condemn Anthony Delasanta"
C: SC#83 - Condemn Automagfreek
C: SC#84 - Repeal "Liberate Islam"
C: SC#111 - Commend Krulltopia ← please forget

User avatar
Unibotian WA Mission
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 432
Founded: Oct 20, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibotian WA Mission » Fri Oct 15, 2010 7:14 pm

A mean old man wrote:EDIT: Although, now that I look at it closer, it seems Durk's up to something much larger than the usual purge. This should prove to be very interesting. I'm going to have to look into this.


Yep but the Old Guard is threatening his delegacy, he probably won't be able to hold the position for much longer. With the reform I think Durk intended on bringing forth, this is a sad thing.
Last edited by Unibotian WA Mission on Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
General Halcones wrote: Look up to Unibot as an example.
Member of Gholgoth | The Capitalis de Societate of The United Defenders League (UDL) | Org. Join Date: 25/05/2008
Unibotian Factbook // An Analysis of NationStates Generations // The Gameplay Alignment Test // NS Weather // How do I join the UDL?
World Assembly Card Gallery // The Unibotian Life Expectancy Index // Proudly Authored 9 GA Res., 14 SC Res. // Commended by SC#78;

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
✯ Duty is Eternal, Justice is Imminent: UDL

User avatar
Ardchoille
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 9842
Founded: Apr 18, 2004
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ardchoille » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:08 pm

AMOM, Unibot, Reseda Island, you now have a draft proposal to discuss. Discuss it without the flamebait commentary.
Last edited by Ardchoille on Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Left out RI.
Ideological Bulwark #35
The more scandalous charges were suppressed; the vicar of Christ was accused only of piracy, rape, sodomy, murder and incest. -- Edward Gibbon on the schismatic Pope John XXIII (1410–1415).

User avatar
Kalibarr
Minister
 
Posts: 2241
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kalibarr » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:15 pm

I'm sorry, but how exactly were Uni and AMOM flamebaiting?

Edit: not sure why there was a random "t" floating around
Last edited by Kalibarr on Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:18 pm

Flamebait? :(

User avatar
Ardchoille
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 9842
Founded: Apr 18, 2004
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ardchoille » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:27 pm

Judgmental commentary on the attitudes and motives of another player tends to invite heated responses from the other player, or his supporters.

Condemnations are of necessity judgmental, but this is a drafting thread and the discussion should centre on adding to, taking from or redrafting the content of the proposal.

Unless documented corruption, the state of TNP's governance or the sadness or otherwise of its political situation are going to be written into the proposal, they should be discussed elsewhere.
Ideological Bulwark #35
The more scandalous charges were suppressed; the vicar of Christ was accused only of piracy, rape, sodomy, murder and incest. -- Edward Gibbon on the schismatic Pope John XXIII (1410–1415).

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:37 pm

Ardchoille wrote:Unless documented corruption, the state of TNP's governance or the sadness or otherwise of its political situation are going to be written into the proposal, they should be discussed elsewhere.


NOTING that on 2010 October 14, the Durkadurkiranistan regime reemerged and declared the creation of a North Pacific Provisional Authority in response to Flemingovia's recent success in the North Pacific Delegate Election (with 17 votes),

[..]

FURTHER UNDERSTANDING that the North Pacific Provisional Authority does have commendable goals such as facilitating a larger, more open election in the near future (hence the name, "provisional" authority),

BELIEVING that a condemnation of Durkadurkiranistan would serve as..
(a) a deterrent for other delegates from spontaneously ejecting large masses of nations in "purges",
(b) a remonstration to any nefarious intentions that the North Pacific Provisional Authority may have,

User avatar
A mean old man
Senator
 
Posts: 4386
Founded: Jun 27, 2008
Father Knows Best State

Postby A mean old man » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:44 pm

Ardchoille wrote:Judgmental commentary on the attitudes and motives of another player tends to invite heated responses from the other player, or his supporters.

Condemnations are of necessity judgmental, but this is a drafting thread and the discussion should centre on adding to, taking from or redrafting the content of the proposal.

Unless documented corruption, the state of TNP's governance or the sadness or otherwise of its political situation are going to be written into the proposal, they should be discussed elsewhere.


I'm sorry, I thought that talking about whatever Durk was up to in TNP might actually have to do with supporting or opposing a condemnation of him based on whatever he was up to in TNP. But maybe I'm wrong.
Last edited by A mean old man on Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A: SC#16 - Repeal "Liberate The Security Council"
A: SC#26 - Commend The Joint Systems Alliance
A: SC#30 - Commend 10000 Islands
A: SC#37 - Condemn NAZI EUROPE
A: SC#38 - Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"
A: GA#149 - On Expiration Dates
C: SC#58 - Repeal "Commend Sedgistan"
A: SC#62 - Repeal "Condemn Swarmlandia"
C: SC#63 - Commend Ballotonia
A: SC#65 - Condemn Punk Reloaded
C: GA#163 - Repeal "Law of the Sea"
A: SC#72 - Repeal "Commend Mikeswill"
C: SC#74 - Condemn Lone Wolves United
C: SC#76 - Repeal "Condemn Thatcherton"
A: SC#81 - Repeal "Condemn Anthony Delasanta"
C: SC#83 - Condemn Automagfreek
C: SC#84 - Repeal "Liberate Islam"
C: SC#111 - Commend Krulltopia ← please forget

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:46 pm

A mean old man wrote:
Ardchoille wrote:Judgmental commentary on the attitudes and motives of another player tends to invite heated responses from the other player, or his supporters.

Condemnations are of necessity judgmental, but this is a drafting thread and the discussion should centre on adding to, taking from or redrafting the content of the proposal.

Unless documented corruption, the state of TNP's governance or the sadness or otherwise of its political situation are going to be written into the proposal, they should be discussed elsewhere.


I'm sorry, I thought that talking about whatever Durk was up to in TNP might actually have to do with supporting or opposing a condemnation of him based on whatever he was up to in TNP. But maybe I'm wrong.


I think she meant more about me bringing up how Durk's actually got a good goal in mind and that it is sad that he probably won't be able to achieve those goals from opposition by the Old Guard. That could upset the Old Guard.

Edit: I did it again.. frig...
Last edited by Unibot on Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
A mean old man
Senator
 
Posts: 4386
Founded: Jun 27, 2008
Father Knows Best State

Postby A mean old man » Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:02 pm

Unibot wrote:
A mean old man wrote:
I'm sorry, I thought that talking about whatever Durk was up to in TNP might actually have to do with supporting or opposing a condemnation of him based on whatever he was up to in TNP. But maybe I'm wrong.


I think she meant more about me bringing up how Durk's actually got a good goal in mind and that it is sad that he probably won't be able to achieve those goals from opposition by the Old Guard. That could upset the Old Guard.

Edit: I did it again.. frig...


Hmph. Well, I'm going elsewhere to discuss the impact that Durk's coup could have on TNP's future and on the future of the feeders in general. Good night.
A: SC#16 - Repeal "Liberate The Security Council"
A: SC#26 - Commend The Joint Systems Alliance
A: SC#30 - Commend 10000 Islands
A: SC#37 - Condemn NAZI EUROPE
A: SC#38 - Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"
A: GA#149 - On Expiration Dates
C: SC#58 - Repeal "Commend Sedgistan"
A: SC#62 - Repeal "Condemn Swarmlandia"
C: SC#63 - Commend Ballotonia
A: SC#65 - Condemn Punk Reloaded
C: GA#163 - Repeal "Law of the Sea"
A: SC#72 - Repeal "Commend Mikeswill"
C: SC#74 - Condemn Lone Wolves United
C: SC#76 - Repeal "Condemn Thatcherton"
A: SC#81 - Repeal "Condemn Anthony Delasanta"
C: SC#83 - Condemn Automagfreek
C: SC#84 - Repeal "Liberate Islam"
C: SC#111 - Commend Krulltopia ← please forget

User avatar
Reseda Island
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 394
Founded: Mar 13, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Reseda Island » Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:39 pm

In terms of either Draft, the nation name would have to be changed to fit his new stats as number 2.
"Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it." -RFK June 5th 1968

User avatar
Mythasia
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Oct 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mythasia » Sun Oct 17, 2010 1:33 am

Being one of those who was ejected by Durkadurkiranistan II I support the condemnation. The use of power in this way is clearly an abuse of such power. Keep in many of those being ejected are likely new to nationstate. Allowing such abuse only gives the impression that those new here are unwelcome.

User avatar
Whereisthatistan
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Oct 10, 2007
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Whereisthatistan » Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:00 am

Mythasia wrote:Being one of those who was ejected by Durkadurkiranistan II I support the condemnation. The use of power in this way is clearly an abuse of such power. Keep in many of those being ejected are likely new to nationstate. Allowing such abuse only gives the impression that those new here are unwelcome.


The person behind Durkadurkiranistan II would just consider this a badge of honor. Condemning The North Pacific for putting this jerk in power to remind us not to do it again might be a better idea.
What do I know I just lurk here.

User avatar
Blue Wolf II
Attaché
 
Posts: 97
Founded: Sep 13, 2005
Corporate Bordello

Postby Blue Wolf II » Sun Oct 17, 2010 11:08 am

Well, The North Pacific didn't actually put him in power. He used an unendorsement campaign against Ermarian who was the elected Delegate at the time, lowering their endorsement count to something that a good endoswapper could overtake. Durka, being a good endoswapper, thus overtook Erm with ease.

So you really can't blame TNP for being couped by someone who wasn't voted into the seat in the first place and used trickery to get there.

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Sun Oct 17, 2010 11:13 am

Blue Wolf II wrote:Well, The North Pacific didn't actually put him in power. He used an unendorsement campaign against Ermarian who was the elected Delegate at the time, lowering their endorsement count to something that a good endoswapper could overtake. Durka, being a good endoswapper, thus overtook Erm with ease.


Actually he needed to convince Dharma and I to send a couple of troops to get him the endorsement count he needed. After being throughly lied to about the platform that Dirt Durk was touting, we're not proud with our my decision to back him up.

User avatar
Eireann Fae
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Oct 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eireann Fae » Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:04 pm

I find it interesting that Durkadurkiranistan II himself supports this condemnation.

Approvals: 6 (Neo Nibu, Wilkshire, Malaysii, Demphor, Durkadurkiranistan II, -Apollo-)

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:16 pm

Durk likes to be recognized for being dictator, he probably would not like being recognized for being a manipulative scoundrel. He gives dictators in NS a bad name -- figuratively 'speaking', of course. Rule Four however exists to protect these scoundrels, so I don't see it as a viable option.
Last edited by Unibot on Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads