by Reseda Island » Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:59 pm
by Sedgistan » Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:01 pm
by Novaya Zemlja » Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:04 pm
Condemn Durkadurkiranistan II
OBSERVING that Durkadurkiranistan II ejected 534 nations from The North Pacific,
REALIZING that this is nothing compared to his previous ejection spree of 1900 nations,
IGNORING the fact that this proposal violates Rule 4,
OVERLOOKING the crappiness of this proposal,
CONDEMNS Durkadurkiranistan II.
by Vocal Public » Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:09 pm
by Reseda Island » Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:11 pm
Sedgistan wrote:You could talk to TannerFrankLand about combining it with his condemnation from last time around, which was only thwarted by the original Durkadurkiranistan being deleted.
by Unibot » Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:35 pm
The Security Council,
INFORMING ministers, diplomats and envoys of the Security Council that on 2010 March 02, the delegate of the North Pacific, Durkadurkiranistan ejected an excess of @@@@ nations from his region,
ASSERTING that World Assembly Delegates have the right to use their power to eject nations from a region,
FURTHER ASSERTING that Delegates have the responsibility to use that power sparingly or otherwise exclusively for ejection targets that have been deemed to 'deserve' it for whatever reason,
OBSERVING Durkadurkiranistan’s term as delegate was coming to an end on 2010 March 02 and was to be replaced by New Kervoskia,
SHOCKED by Durkadurkiranistan’s ejection of @@@@ nations from The North Pacific, the largest mass ejection in NationStates history for the sake of a 'grand finale' according to the region's World Factbook Entry,
RECOGNIZING that the original Durkadurkiranistani threat to world peace was suppressed with secretariat influence -- this suppression established a false sense of security,
NOTING that on 2010 October 14, the Durkadurkiranistan regime reemerged and declared the creation of a North Pacific Provisional Authority in response to Flemingovia's recent success in the North Pacific Delegate Election (with 17 votes),
UNDERSTANDING that the Durkadurkiranistan regime has also imposed "Project Purge", where another mass ejection of approximatively @@@@ nations is projected,
FURTHER UNDERSTANDING that the North Pacific Provisional Authority does have commendable goals such as facilitating a larger, more open election in the near future (hence the name, "provisional" authority),
BELIEVING that a condemnation of Durkadurkiranistan would serve as..
(a) a deterrent for other delegates from spontaneously ejecting large masses of nations in "purges",
(b) a remonstration to any nefarious intentions that the North Pacific Provisional Authority may have,
HEREBY CONDEMNS the Durkadurkiranistan regime.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by A mean old man » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:22 pm
by Reseda Island » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:34 pm
A mean old man wrote:Durk is pretty damn hilarious. What he manages to get away with doesn't speak very highly of the organization of his region, though.
by A mean old man » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:39 pm
by Unibotian WA Mission » Fri Oct 15, 2010 7:14 pm
A mean old man wrote:EDIT: Although, now that I look at it closer, it seems Durk's up to something much larger than the usual purge. This should prove to be very interesting. I'm going to have to look into this.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
General Halcones wrote: Look up to Unibot as an example.
by Ardchoille » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:08 pm
by Unibot » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:18 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Ardchoille » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:27 pm
by Unibot » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:37 pm
Ardchoille wrote:Unless documented corruption, the state of TNP's governance or the sadness or otherwise of its political situation are going to be written into the proposal, they should be discussed elsewhere.
NOTING that on 2010 October 14, the Durkadurkiranistan regime reemerged and declared the creation of a North Pacific Provisional Authority in response to Flemingovia's recent success in the North Pacific Delegate Election (with 17 votes),
[..]
FURTHER UNDERSTANDING that the North Pacific Provisional Authority does have commendable goals such as facilitating a larger, more open election in the near future (hence the name, "provisional" authority),
BELIEVING that a condemnation of Durkadurkiranistan would serve as..
(a) a deterrent for other delegates from spontaneously ejecting large masses of nations in "purges",
(b) a remonstration to any nefarious intentions that the North Pacific Provisional Authority may have,
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by A mean old man » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:44 pm
Ardchoille wrote:Judgmental commentary on the attitudes and motives of another player tends to invite heated responses from the other player, or his supporters.
Condemnations are of necessity judgmental, but this is a drafting thread and the discussion should centre on adding to, taking from or redrafting the content of the proposal.
Unless documented corruption, the state of TNP's governance or the sadness or otherwise of its political situation are going to be written into the proposal, they should be discussed elsewhere.
by Unibot » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:46 pm
A mean old man wrote:Ardchoille wrote:Judgmental commentary on the attitudes and motives of another player tends to invite heated responses from the other player, or his supporters.
Condemnations are of necessity judgmental, but this is a drafting thread and the discussion should centre on adding to, taking from or redrafting the content of the proposal.
Unless documented corruption, the state of TNP's governance or the sadness or otherwise of its political situation are going to be written into the proposal, they should be discussed elsewhere.
I'm sorry, I thought that talking about whatever Durk was up to in TNP might actually have to do with supporting or opposing a condemnation of him based on whatever he was up to in TNP. But maybe I'm wrong.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by A mean old man » Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:02 pm
Unibot wrote:A mean old man wrote:I'm sorry, I thought that talking about whatever Durk was up to in TNP might actually have to do with supporting or opposing a condemnation of him based on whatever he was up to in TNP. But maybe I'm wrong.
I think she meant more about me bringing up how Durk's actually got a good goal in mind and that it is sad that he probably won't be able to achieve those goals from opposition by the Old Guard. That could upset the Old Guard.
Edit: I did it again.. frig...
by Reseda Island » Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:39 pm
by Mythasia » Sun Oct 17, 2010 1:33 am
by Whereisthatistan » Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:00 am
Mythasia wrote:Being one of those who was ejected by Durkadurkiranistan II I support the condemnation. The use of power in this way is clearly an abuse of such power. Keep in many of those being ejected are likely new to nationstate. Allowing such abuse only gives the impression that those new here are unwelcome.
by Blue Wolf II » Sun Oct 17, 2010 11:08 am
by Unibot » Sun Oct 17, 2010 11:13 am
Blue Wolf II wrote:Well, The North Pacific didn't actually put him in power. He used an unendorsement campaign against Ermarian who was the elected Delegate at the time, lowering their endorsement count to something that a good endoswapper could overtake. Durka, being a good endoswapper, thus overtook Erm with ease.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Eireann Fae » Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:04 pm
Approvals: 6 (Neo Nibu, Wilkshire, Malaysii, Demphor, Durkadurkiranistan II, -Apollo-)
by Unibot » Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:16 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement