Page 1 of 1
[Draft] Condemn Nationalist Northumbria
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 2:46 pmby Dalavi
OBSERVING that nationalist northumbria frequently uses the forums to push for Northumbrian Independence even though being told to stop several times by mods.
NOTING that Nationalist northumbria frequently makes many joke proposals with no actual substance which bogs down the world assemably
ACKNOWALEDGING that nationalist northumbria has been banned several times for above reasons, yet still does it
FURTHER NOTING that several people defend this kind of behavior like Free algerstonia
hearby condemning nationalist northumbria
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 2:47 pmby Dalavi
also if anyone has anything more to add i'd put it in, the more dirt the better
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 2:47 pmby The Hurricane
Against.
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 2:48 pmby New Anarchisticstan
AGAINST. Bad reasons and grammar. You cannot condemn someone just because their proposals suck and the mods hate them
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 2:49 pmby Crazy girl
I suggest you have a read through the Security Council rules first.
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 4:17 pmby Bhang Bhang Duc
Spelling - 4/10, must do better.
Grammar - 5/10 and I’m being generous.
Condemnable Acts recorded - 0/10
Illegality - 10/10, managed to get a passing grade on this last one.
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 4:20 pmby Free Algerstonia
megaregion moment
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 4:22 pmby Istastioner
Opposed due the reasons metioned by
New Anarchisticstan here, Despite the nominee
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 4:22 pmby Galactic Powers
I don’t know why everyone is surprised NN keeps doing crazy things when everyone keeps giving him attention and rewarding that kind of behavior…
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 4:25 pmby Vertillia
I don't really like to put an input in discussions like these, but in this case, I will have to put my vote AGAINST this condemnation. There does not seem to be enough evidence of wrongdoing worthy of condemnation and the primary rationale for one would be from proposals that OP does not agree with, and if that or anything else mentioned here is that much of a problem, then it should be dealt with accordingly by the mods. As much as I do not agree with the nation's behavior, I do not think there's simply enough from OP's reasons to condemn them. Also, apparently spelling and grammar matter in terms of drafting a condemnation and many other nations on here have pointed this out, so I might as well add that to my reasons.
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 5:30 pmby The Orwell Society
Blatantly illegal and poorly written.
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 6:28 pmby The Ice States
Let's not give this kind of attention to a troll.
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 7:36 pmby Heidgaudr
Dalavi wrote:NOTING that Nationalist northumbria frequently makes many joke proposals with no actual substance which bogs down the world assemably
So the very thing you're doing right now?
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 7:39 pmby Millenhaal
NN is a fun television to watch, nothing more. Not worthy of resolution. Would fail due to length even if they did something worthy of honor. Also, Condemnations are basically like commendations except they are for in-character bad deeds that are still impressive.
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 7:41 pmby El Lazaro
I support it because I think NN would love the attention.
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 7:43 pmby Honeydewistania
Well written. Support.
Posted:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 11:11 pmby WayNeacTia
Honeydewistania wrote:Well written. Support.
Can we not encourage this please?
Posted:
Sun Feb 05, 2023 4:15 amby New Anarchisticstan
Honeydewistania wrote:Well written. Support.
I'm glad you got commended
Wayneactia wrote:Honeydewistania wrote:Well written. Support.
Can we not encourage this please?
I would gladly encourage it if the goal was pure sarcasm and a quick laugh. Just like that condemn TCB resolution, stained in against votes.