[DRAFT] On Badge Hunters

[Improper Classifications]

I'd voice my support if this came back.

[800]

I've decided I'll write one more draft for this thing, one more. I don't have access to Collection Session Currently so I'll write it here.

Sneering at people whose sole goal is to clog up the boxes of the WA with useless and meaningless proposals that ultimately either get discarded by the SC’s arbiters of legality or thrown away to be forgotten about.

Chuckling at the fact people of this caliber have been appearing more in recent times, with them clogging up the boxes even more to a degree than before.

Confused by how effortless and thoughtless their writings can be, without much of a merit, only looking for either attention or overall wars about how completely meaningless said proposal is.

Bewildered that these people keep going with their posts, often going against their critics in horrifically pointless and terribly thought-out proposals that keep appearing at more a rapid pace.

Regretting something like this even needs to be conjured up and sent out into the world, hoping that these finally are put to rest, at least for the time being.

Self Aware these may be glorifying them, but nevertheless was never about giving them glory or attention, and just showing that the world stage doesn't want them on the assembly throwing paper around the place with no merit or penmanship

Believing Penmanship is key to everyone's success, and abuse of it is deemed completely offensive as it puts focus on the wrong people, and causes actual talented writers to feel buried as the world focuses its eyeglasses on horrific writings.

HEREBY declares that these people are causing great pain on writers' moods around the world.

I'll be editing this quite a bit.

[One Small Island]

If you must revive this and carry on with it (which I don't think you should) you should request a legality check on the word "locked" in this context.

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

If you must revive this and carry on with it (which I don't think you should) you should request a legality check on the word "locked" in this context.

“Discarded by the SC’s arbiters of legality” might work.

[800]

If you must revive this and carry on with it (which I don't think you should) you should request a legality check on the word "locked" in this context.

Oh yeah, that makes sense, I probably am treading too close to something here.

[800]

If you must revive this and carry on with it (which I don't think you should) you should request a legality check on the word "locked" in this context.

“Discarded by the SC’s arbiters of legality” might work.

Sounds perfect, let me patch it in there.

[Concrete Slab]

Yo, why did you write a proposal about me?

[Improper Classifications]

Yo, why did you write a proposal about me?

[Collection Session]

Updated to include the current draft.


Churning the gears on this again.

[Pineappleistania]

Against. I think the general idea is interesting, but I'd rather see a draft that takes aim at low quality submissions instead of the people submitting them.