NationStates

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:

The Universe World wrote:I give new players a three month grace period. So once Northumbria goes past that, I think it is fair to say that they will be perennially submitting illegal resolutions.

The player has had a number of nations over a period of a lot longer than three months. They’ve been banned from starting threads/drafts on certain subjects or haven’t you been around much recently?

I do not frequent the WA forums often, so I was unaware.

-Northumbria wrote:I thought it perfectly addressed the proposal.

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:What can I say except:

Another defeat for -Northumbria.

Really? Where does the proposal say ‘defeated’? It seems you are wrong again.

Even if your proposal was to somehow pass, it would be struck down automatically due to being illegal.

-Northumbria wrote:I thought it perfectly addressed the proposal.

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:What can I say except:

Another defeat for -Northumbria.

Really? Where does the proposal say ‘defeated’? It seems you are wrong again.

Defeated by your own ineptitude, your inability to write a legal repeal. Keep lining them up sunshine and I’ll keep knocking them over the boundary rope. Just call me the Ben Stokes of the SC. You should get that reference coming, supposedly, from the north-east of Llogres.

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:

-Northumbria wrote:I thought it perfectly addressed the proposal.


Really? Where does the proposal say ‘defeated’? It seems you are wrong again.

Defeated by your own ineptitude, your inability to write a legal repeal. Keep lining them up sunshine and I’ll keep knocking them over the boundary rope. Just call me the Ben Stokes of the SC. You should get that reference coming, supposedly, from the north-east of Llogres.

Wrong again. You did nothing. I don’t see anything about it being declared illegal by you on the proposal. And no, I don’t. I know the name but I don’t follow cricket. That’s a Yorkshire thing. So also wrong there.

-Northumbria wrote:

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Defeated by your own ineptitude, your inability to write a legal repeal. Keep lining them up sunshine and I’ll keep knocking them over the boundary rope. Just call me the Ben Stokes of the SC. You should get that reference coming, supposedly, from the north-east of Llogres.

Wrong again. You did nothing. I don’t see anything about it being declared illegal by you on the proposal. And no, I don’t. I know the name but I don’t follow cricket. That’s a Yorkshire thing. So also wrong there.

Why would I bother telling you? You are so, so convinced of being right all the time that you wouldn’t listen.

I’d much rather keep quiet and let you fail through your own incompetence.

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:

-Northumbria wrote:Wrong again. You did nothing. I don’t see anything about it being declared illegal by you on the proposal. And no, I don’t. I know the name but I don’t follow cricket. That’s a Yorkshire thing. So also wrong there.

Why would I bother telling you? You are so, so convinced of being right all the time that you wouldn’t listen.

I’d much rather keep quiet and let you fail through your own incompetence.

What, about the reference?

-Northumbria wrote:

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Defeated by your own ineptitude, your inability to write a legal repeal. Keep lining them up sunshine and I’ll keep knocking them over the boundary rope. Just call me the Ben Stokes of the SC. You should get that reference coming, supposedly, from the north-east of Llogres.

Wrong again. You did nothing. I don’t see anything about it being declared illegal by you on the proposal. And no, I don’t. I know the name but I don’t follow cricket. That’s a Yorkshire thing. So also wrong there.

You are genuinely unaware of it being deemed illegal?
Mom, can you pick me up? I’m scared.

I'll just drop a link to it here.

The Universe World wrote:

-Northumbria wrote:Wrong again. You did nothing. I don’t see anything about it being declared illegal by you on the proposal. And no, I don’t. I know the name but I don’t follow cricket. That’s a Yorkshire thing. So also wrong there.

You are genuinely unaware of it being deemed illegal?
Mom, can you pick me up? I’m scared.

No, I said he had nothing to do with it. It's obvious with context.

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:

-Northumbria wrote:Wrong again. You did nothing. I don’t see anything about it being declared illegal by you on the proposal. And no, I don’t. I know the name but I don’t follow cricket. That’s a Yorkshire thing. So also wrong there.

Why would I bother telling you? You are so, so convinced of being right all the time that you wouldn’t listen.

I’d much rather keep quiet and let you fail through your own incompetence.

He’s admitted he was wrong before so isn’t “so convinced of being right all the time.”

Plewnidminster wrote:

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Why would I bother telling you? You are so, so convinced of being right all the time that you wouldn’t listen.

I’d much rather keep quiet and let you fail through your own incompetence.

He’s admitted he was wrong before so isn’t “so convinced of being right all the time.”

Let it die…. NO NO