Lenlyvit wrote:The United Penguin Commonwealth wrote:
…I already read the target. I still don’t understand the second argument. it appears to be about writing standards or something, which the target never mentions. the argument at the top boils down to “some GA members are mean, so let’s retaliate by ceasing recognition”. the second half of that argument is strange considering that if you wanted the GA to recognize the SC, you could’ve tried to pass a GA resolution recognizing the SC.
I'm just going to quickly intercede here, and point out that I think the bolded point is technically impossible to do from the GA resolution standpoint.
In that case, the argument is still wrong because it’s expressing disappointment that something impossible hasn’t been done.