SC Rules discussion

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.


Remove ads

User avatar
Posts: 1052
Founded: Feb 13, 2012
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Lenlyvit » Sun Nov 21, 2021 12:40 pm

Sedgistan wrote:
Thousand Branches wrote:This line should be changed in the SC rules post to reflect the new names for GCRs:

"Feeder (as in 'feeder region') or Sinker - legal."


Warzone Codger wrote:Are nations such as the 'TRR WA Committee' allowed to be listed as co authors? I thought they are barred from the current interpretation of this rule, which unfortunately might be one of the reasons such regional programs never got off the ground.

I think the rule should be adjusted to allow such programs and regional promotion - if a region is focused on the WA they should be entitled to boast about it.

They're allowed. I don't recall us banning them previously, though I may be wrong. It sounds like the kind of thing the GA would have prohibited.

Suggested change to 4b:

Co-authors should use the in-built mechanics for recording co-authors, rather than listing them in the text of proposals. [Note: since this feature was added in November 2021, resolutions prior to this have co-authors listed in the resolution text, which was legal at the time.] Lists of supporters or similar are not permitted.

This introduces a new restriction - adding additional co-authors via the text. The coded co-author system has notifications for co-authors (they they've been listed as one, and when someone tries to repeal a passed resolution they co-authored), badges, and allows the co-author to withdraw a proposal without having to go via the Moderation team. Since that system is far superior, it makes sense to force people to use it.

The change looks good to me.
Former three time Delegate of 10000 Islands

I've been commended by the Security Council. Author of 17 Security Council Resolutions.

User avatar
Thousand Branches
Posts: 195
Founded: Jun 03, 2021
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Thousand Branches » Sun Nov 21, 2021 12:44 pm

Don’t wanna snip but I concur with Lenly, it looks like a good change. And thanks for updating the other line! :)
You are frikkin beautiful!! Have the best day ever my friend!!
|| Aramantha Calendula ||
○•○ Writer, editor, and World Assembly fanatic ○•○
•○• Proud member of House Elegarth •○•
○•○ Telegram or message me on discord at Aramantha#4290 for writing or editing help ○•○
•○• Have an awesome day you! •○•

User avatar
Unibot III
Posts: 6428
Founded: Mar 11, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Unibot III » Sun Nov 21, 2021 12:58 pm

The precedent against working groups was set in a case against the South Pacific during ‘Commend Fudgetopia.’ I also hated the ruling and happy to see it reversed. :p
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
Org. Join Date: 25/05/2008 | Former Delegate of TRR | Gameplay Alignment: -18 / -13
Unibotian Factbook // Collected works // The Gameplay Alignment Test //
Proudly Authored 9 GA Res., 14 SC Res. // Commended by SC#78

✯ Duty is Eternal, Justice is Imminent: UDL


Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Raghallaigh


Remove ads