[DEFEATED] Repeal Condemn The Black Hawks (SC#52)

by **Madjack** » Tue May 10, 2022 8:25 am

Wayneactia wrote:Seems like Madjack dropped the ball on this one and forget to vote.

I would never forget to vote. I have a WA Minister who pings me when I need to, it's nice.

As for this resolution - I personally wasn't in favour of it, and politically I don't really view The Black Hawks as an enemy of The North Pacific. Maybe in terms of the majority of our military conduct, but most of that is currently focussed on the Brotherhood of Malice, for obvious reasons.

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Tue May 10, 2022 9:02 am

"Repeal "Condemn The Black Hawks"" was defeated 10,045 votes to 4,983.

Got the kicking it deserved.

by **WayNeacTia** » Tue May 10, 2022 9:05 am

Madjack wrote:
Wayneactia wrote:Seems like Madjack dropped the ball on this one and forget to vote.

I would never forget to vote. I have a WA Minister who pings me when I need to, it's nice.

As for this resolution - I personally wasn't in favour of it, and politically I don't really view The Black Hawks as an enemy of The North Pacific. Maybe in terms of the majority of our military conduct, but most of that is currently focussed on the Brotherhood of Malice, for obvious reasons.

And if they raid Stargate three or four times? Does that change the equation?

by **Madjack** » Tue May 10, 2022 9:06 am

Wayneactia wrote:
Madjack wrote:I would never forget to vote. I have a WA Minister who pings me when I need to, it's nice.

As for this resolution - I personally wasn't in favour of it, and politically I don't really view The Black Hawks as an enemy of The North Pacific. Maybe in terms of the majority of our military conduct, but most of that is currently focussed on the Brotherhood of Malice, for obvious reasons.

And if they raid Stargate three or four times? Does that change the equation?

Yes, obviously.

But they aren't going to do that.

by **Team Leo** » Tue May 10, 2022 10:04 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
"Repeal "Condemn The Black Hawks"" was defeated 10,045 votes to 4,983.

Got the kicking it deserved.

Amen. But if y'all didn't like it, why did your delegate approve it?

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Tue May 10, 2022 10:17 am

Team Leo wrote:
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
"Repeal "Condemn The Black Hawks"" was defeated 10,045 votes to 4,983.

Got the kicking it deserved.

Amen. But if y'all didn't like it, why did your delegate approve it?

They voted against the repeal. As usual you seem to be misinformed.

by **WayNeacTia** » Tue May 10, 2022 10:18 am

Team Leo wrote:
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
"Repeal "Condemn The Black Hawks"" was defeated 10,045 votes to 4,983.

Got the kicking it deserved.

Amen. But if y'all didn't like it, why did your delegate approve it?

The same reason we humor you. It kills off a couple of seconds….

by **Team Leo** » Tue May 10, 2022 10:23 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
Team Leo wrote:Amen. But if y'all didn't like it, why did your delegate approve it?

They voted against the repeal. As usual you seem to be misinformed.

Why'd you approve the damn thing in the first place!!!!????

Wayneactia wrote:
Team Leo wrote:Amen. But if y'all didn't like it, why did your delegate approve it?

The same reason we humor you. It kills off a couple of seconds….

You do it just to anger me??!!

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Tue May 10, 2022 10:38 am

Team Leo wrote:
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:They voted against the repeal. As usual you seem to be misinformed.

Why'd you approve the damn thing in the first place!!!!????

I didn’t - I’m not TWP’s Delegate. A small detail which probably escaped your notice, like most things.

by **Team Leo** » Tue May 10, 2022 10:50 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
Team Leo wrote:Why'd you approve the damn thing in the first place!!!!????

I didn’t - I’m not TWP’s Delegate. A small detail which probably escaped your notice, like most things.

Oh

by **WayNeacTia** » Tue May 10, 2022 11:11 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
Team Leo wrote:Why'd you approve the damn thing in the first place!!!!????

I didn’t - I’m not TWP’s Delegate. A small detail which probably escaped your notice, like most things.

If there was ever a reason to use the :facepalm emoji, this would be it....

by **Bistritza** » Fri May 13, 2022 11:44 am

Team Leo wrote:
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:I didn’t - I’m not TWP’s Delegate. A small detail which probably escaped your notice, like most things.

Oh

Soft OOC:
Don't beat yourself up about it, it's a common mistake.
What I don't understand is you being angry at TWP at all for WA votes - their VP is sometimes enough to be a tie-breaker but the stance is almost always known before it's even approved.

by **WayNeacTia** » Fri May 13, 2022 2:16 pm

Bistritza wrote:
Team Leo wrote:Oh

Soft OOC:
Don't beat yourself up about it, it's a common mistake.
What I don't understand is you being angry at TWP at all for WA votes - their VP is sometimes enough to be a tie-breaker but the stance is almost always known before it's even approved.

BBD punted him out of TWP when he first started and grudges run deep I guess.....

by **Bistritza** » Fri May 13, 2022 5:36 pm

Wayneactia wrote:
Bistritza wrote:
Soft OOC:
Don't beat yourself up about it, it's a common mistake.
What I don't understand is you being angry at TWP at all for WA votes - their VP is sometimes enough to be a tie-breaker but the stance is almost always known before it's even approved.

BBD punted him out of TWP when he first started and grudges run deep I guess.....

SOOC:
Oh. I just background checked and he's still in meritocratic regions.
So that's hilarious.
Anyway, time to write Condemn BH #3.

[DEFEATED] Repeal Condemn The Black Hawks (SC#52)

go away bistritza you didn't even vote

mods bistritza is in wa subforum again

Who is online