[Abandoned] Repeal: Liberate Embassy Regionia

by **Fachumonn** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 10:33 am

With native support, I have decided to post this -> (Just ask the current delegate Swaklaton). <-
I hope they can ban the founder and can password it!

The World Assembly Security Council,

Recognising the horrific undertaking in EmbassyRegionia, in which raiders from raiding organisations terrorised the natives of the region, of which organisations include; Brotherhood of Malice, The Black Hawks, Lone Wolves United, and Osiris’ Sekhmet Legion among many others,

Applauding the efforts of [resolution=SC#395]SC#395 “Liberate EmbassyRegionia”[/resolution] in ensuring the safety of this region, as well as the valiant dedication to giving the region back to the native members, where they may recollect their region and build it back up,

Noticing that native delegate Swaklaton has regained control and restored the region after the raid, and raiders no longer occupy any ground on it anymore, almost all of them having thankfully long left,

Understanding that without a password protecting the region it could very easily be taken over again by raiders soon after it is rebuilt,

Acknowledging the necessity to repeal the standing liberation to accommodate this password,

Hereby Repeals SC#395 “Liberate EmbassyRegionia”.

by **Malphe II** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 10:40 am

Huh, which natives? I guess if you want to continue embassy collecting locking behind a password is a safe bet.

by **Tinhampton** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 11:02 am

The region link should be to "EmbassyRegionia," not "Embassy Regionia." Otherwise, support if necessary.

by **Malphe II** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 11:04 am

Have made a number of readability edits, otherwise looks fine to me!

by **Fachumonn** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 12:34 pm

Malphe II wrote:Have made a number of readability edits, otherwise looks fine to me!

The World Assembly Security Council,

Recognising the horrific undertaking in by raiders that just took place in the region of Embassyregionia, in which raiders from raiding organisations terrorised the natives of the region, of which organisations include; BoM (the Brotherhood of Malice), TBH (The Black Hawks), LWU (Lone Wolves United), and Osiris’ Sekhmet Legion among many others,

Applauding the efforts of [resolution=SC#395]SC#395 “Liberate EmbassyRegionia”[/resolution] in ensuring the safety of this region, as well as the valiant dedication to giving the region back to the native members, where they may recollect their region and build it back up,

Noticing that a native delegate Swaklaton and the one who was delegate before the raid, has been restored to the region after the raid, Swaklaton, and raiders no longer occupy any ground on it anymore, almost all of them having thankfully long left,

Understanding that without a password protecting the region, it could very easily be taken over again by raiders soon after it is rebuilt, again implementing their disgusting ways in getting rid of communities, and wanting this endeavour to stop, so,

Recognizing the necessity to repeal the standing liberation to accommodate this password,

Hereby Repeals SC#395 “Liberate EmbassyRegionia”.

The World Assembly Security Council,

Recognising the horrific undertaking in Embassyregionia, in which raiders from raiding organisations terrorised the natives of the region, of which organisations include; the Brotherhood of Malice, The Black Hawks, Lone Wolves United, and Osiris’ Sekhmet Legion among many others,

Applauding the efforts of [resolution=SC#395]SC#395 “Liberate EmbassyRegionia”[/resolution] in ensuring the safety of this region, as well as the valiant dedication to giving the region back to the native members, where they may recollect their region and build it back up,

Noticing that native delegate Swaklaton has been restored to the region after the raid, and raiders no longer occupy any ground on it anymore, almost all of them having thankfully long left,

Understanding that without a password protecting the region it could very easily be taken over again by raiders soon after it is rebuilt,

Recognizing the necessity to repeal the standing liberation to accommodate this password,

Hereby Repeals SC#395 “Liberate EmbassyRegionia”.

Almost all implemented. Huge thanks!

by **Astrobolt** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 1:24 pm

Is there any reason why the author and the author’s region are still voting for the resolution, or is it simply a case of forgetting to switch their votes to against?

by **Fachumonn** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 1:24 pm

Well, there is no need for this anymore...
Can't. The region voted for.

by **Malphe II** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 1:32 pm

Fachumonn wrote:Well, there is no need for this anymore...
Can't. The region voted for.

Assuming that's sarcasm?

If OP has actually communicated with the current delegate, & they've expressly sanctioned this, their WA vote will make no difference. Isn't like an against vote will swing a no-brainer liberation vote like this.

by **Minskiev** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 1:37 pm

Hopefully this won't be necessary. But very rich badgehunting coming from:

Fachumonn wrote:Completely and utterly unapprove. Seems like once Minsk saw a repeal coming, new they had to whip something up real fast.

I am petty

by **Fachumonn** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 1:47 pm

Malphe II wrote:
Fachumonn wrote:Well, there is no need for this anymore...
Can't. The region voted for.

Assuming that's sarcasm?

If OP has actually communicated with the current delegate, & they've expressly sanctioned this, their WA vote will make no difference. Isn't like an against vote will swing a no-brainer liberation vote like this.

I did communicate. They said, and I quote "Looking Good" as the response.

by **Fachumonn** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 1:49 pm

Minskiev wrote:Hopefully this won't be necessary. But very rich badgehunting coming from:
Fachumonn wrote:Completely and utterly unapprove. Seems like once Minsk saw a repeal coming, new they had to whip something up real fast.

I am petty

Except there wasn't a repeal coming

. Also, this was waited on for about a day and a half, so that's not nothing!

by **Refuge Isle** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 2:14 pm

Fachumonn wrote:
Minskiev wrote:Hopefully this won't be necessary. But very rich badgehunting coming from:

I am petty

Except there wasn't a repeal coming . Also, this was waited on for about a day and a half, so that's not nothing!

Generally liberation repeals are handled by people with a direct relationship with the region in question -- either the natives of the region wishing take their objectives directly to the Security Council, or the defender leadership which has been coordinating the defence and security of the region, while still representing the native interests.

It's always going to look a bit weird for a third party who has had no communication with either group to unilaterally push a proposal like this. At that point, you're clearly not doing it to help anything, as you'd have no idea if it would help or not. It's just helping yourself.

by **Outer Sparta** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 2:27 pm

Refuge Isle wrote:
Fachumonn wrote:Except there wasn't a repeal coming . Also, this was waited on for about a day and a half, so that's not nothing!

Generally liberation repeals are handled by people with a direct relationship with the region in question -- either the natives of the region wishing take their objectives directly to the Security Council, or the defender leadership which has been coordinating the defence and security of the region, while still representing the native interests.

It's always going to look a bit weird for a third party who has had no communication with either group to unilaterally push a proposal like this. At that point, you're clearly not doing it to help anything, as you'd have no idea if it would help or not. It's just helping yourself.

Pretty much agreed. It would be worthy to look at liberation repeal drafts and see how many of them were authored by either a leader of a defending coalition or a native of that region who's back into control and wants the liberation repealed.

Edit: since the liberation appears to be tanking as more and more votes are going against it, then a repeal liberation won't even be necessary at all if the votes against prevail in the end.

by **Fachumonn** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 2:36 pm

Outer Sparta wrote:
Refuge Isle wrote:Generally liberation repeals are handled by people with a direct relationship with the region in question -- either the natives of the region wishing take their objectives directly to the Security Council, or the defender leadership which has been coordinating the defence and security of the region, while still representing the native interests.

It's always going to look a bit weird for a third party who has had no communication with either group to unilaterally push a proposal like this. At that point, you're clearly not doing it to help anything, as you'd have no idea if it would help or not. It's just helping yourself.

Pretty much agreed. It would be worthy to look at liberation repeal drafts and see how many of them were authored by either a leader of a defending coalition or a native of that region who's back into control and wants the liberation repealed.

Edit: since the liberation appears to be tanking as more and more votes are going against it, then a repeal liberation won't even be necessary at all if the votes against prevail in the end.

1st paragraph: To clear up these claims, I communicated with them? I'll tg a screenshot to both of you if you want to see it.
2nd Paragraph: True but I'll wait until it actually fails to abandon it.

by **WayNeacTia** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 2:51 pm

Refuge Isle wrote:
Fachumonn wrote:Except there wasn't a repeal coming . Also, this was waited on for about a day and a half, so that's not nothing!

It's always going to look a bit weird for a third party who has had no communication with either group to unilaterally push a proposal like this. At that point, you're clearly not doing it to help anything, as you'd have no idea if it would help or not. It's just helping yourself.

Agreed. Just because the author waited a whole day and a half, and the delegate says "Looking good" doesn't make this any less of a badge hunt.

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Sat Apr 09, 2022 3:42 pm

Wayneactia wrote:
Refuge Isle wrote:It's always going to look a bit weird for a third party who has had no communication with either group to unilaterally push a proposal like this. At that point, you're clearly not doing it to help anything, as you'd have no idea if it would help or not. It's just helping yourself.

Agreed. Just because the author waited a whole day and a half, and the delegate says "Looking good" doesn't make this any less of a badge hunt.

Pretty much this - the SC is starting to get littered with this author’s abandoned, opportunistic drafts.

[Abandoned] Repeal: Liberate Embassy Regionia

[Abandoned] Repeal: Liberate Embassy Regionia

Who is online