NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] (Declaration) A Malicious Revival

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Fhaengshia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 129
Founded: Apr 30, 2020
Anarchy

[DRAFT] (Declaration) A Malicious Revival

Postby Fhaengshia » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:53 am

UPDATE: This is not specifically about BoM, they just provide really nice theming (and timing) for the wording. Let me know if the name of the declaration is "too much".
I haven’t been on this game for nearly long enough to really know about BoM, but it does give a nice theming to ‘dis’ declaration.
As always it’s a draft so any feedback is welcome.

The Security Council,

Acknowledging the recent watershed month-long siege of A Liberal Haven led by Lone Wolves United ending only when the raider forces withdrew;

Disturbed at the increased rate of ambitious and dangerous tactics employed by raider leadership, particularly Miravana and A Bloodred Moon, so much so that international outrage has further severed previously valued working relationships with various Independent and unaligned forces;

Discouraged that despite the widespread rebuke cast upon raiders, committed forces called upon for occupation of native communities has steadily risen ever higher;

Dispirited at the necromantic revival of the previously interred assassins of The Brotherhood Of Malice particularly given the recent stealth assault on The Mystical Council spearheaded by this fraternity with The Black Hawks and Osiris;

Dismayed at the sheer quantity of the amassed contingent in this occupation, particularly with the rate of mobilization that has produced an imposing bastion of influence;

Disconcerted at the enduring ties within raider forces and further between this faction and the seemingly unchanging partnerships with complicit unaligned and independent co-operatives boldly celebrated as Raider Unity;

Remaining hopeful that these shadows are merely the darkness before dawn and that warmer days ahead will bring a brighter future;

Hereby declares recent raider activity to be a malicious revival necessitating censure and a rallying call for bold defender opposition.

The Security Council,

Acknowledging the recent watershed month-long siege of A Liberal Haven ending only when the raider forces withdrew;

Disturbed at the increased rate of ambitious and dangerous tactics employed by raider leadership, so much so that international outrage has further severed previously valued working relationships with various Independent and unaligned forces;

Discouraged that despite the widespread rebuke cast upon raiders, committed forces called upon for occupation of native communities has steadily risen ever higher;

Dispirited at the necromantic revival of the previously interred assassins of The Brotherhood Of Malice particularly given the recent stealth assault on The Mystical Council spearheaded by this fraternity;

Dismayed at the sheer quantity of the amassed contingent in this occupation, particularly with the rate of mobilization that has produced an imposing bastion of influence;

Disconcerted at the enduring ties within raider forces and further between this faction and the seemingly unchanging partnerships with complicit unaligned and independent co-operatives boldly celebrated as Raider Unity;

Remaining hopeful that these shadows are merely the darkness before dawn and that warmer days ahead will bring a brighter future;

Hereby declares recent raider activity to be a malicious revival necessitating censure and a rallying call for bold defender opposition.
Last edited by Fhaengshia on Wed Feb 09, 2022 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13700
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Wed Feb 09, 2022 2:39 pm

1. Where are the "unaligned and independent" pilers in The Mystical Council?
2. Bold defender opposition... such as being regularly outnumbered two-to-one in TMC. Very much.
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; *author of the most popular SC Res. ever; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; 48yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate ~ currently reading The World by Simon Sebag Montefiore

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15106
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Outer Sparta » Wed Feb 09, 2022 5:03 pm

I don't know if this is really necessary to do, but if you wish to continue, then you need to do some more research on BoM. I assume you haven't been on this site before 2020, but this region has been around for a while and contains big raider names like Reventus Koth. Personally, I think a condemnation might be better suited, but that goes into different territory whether or not they are actually commendable or not.
Free Palestine, stop the genocide in Gaza

User avatar
Fhaengshia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 129
Founded: Apr 30, 2020
Anarchy

Postby Fhaengshia » Wed Feb 09, 2022 6:12 pm

Tinhampton wrote:1. Where are the "unaligned and independent" pilers in The Mystical Council?
2. Bold defender opposition... such as being regularly outnumbered two-to-one in TMC. Very much.

1. Both TWPAF and PRAF are independent, I'm not 100% sure on the exact term some of the other pilers use, but removing/changing 'unaligned' is a pretty easy fix.
2. Hence "a rallying call".

Outer Sparta wrote:I don't know if this is really necessary to do, but if you wish to continue, then you need to do some more research on BoM. I assume you haven't been on this site before 2020, but this region has been around for a while and contains big raider names like Reventus Koth. Personally, I think a condemnation might be better suited, but that goes into different territory whether or not they are actually commendable or not.

You're right I haven't been here before 2020. This is very much NOT a condemnation, I know that C&Cs would require much more specific details. This is really just tangential to BoM as can be seen as the numbers in TMC aren't massively different to ALH.

Maybe it's not fully clear, but this declaration is about how despite raiders losing occasional pilers such as TNP and TEP their numbers have been rising and raiderdom is explicitly in ascendency lately. Even at the tail end of last year over 200 nations on both sides took part in China, but the region was liberated just 24 hrs after the occupation began. TMC has more than that number just in the occupying pile.

If the consensus is that this isn't what declarations are for, then I'm not fussed at all. I feel an opinion such as this is part of what declarations are all about, there is considerable unexplored area for the suitability of declarations after all.

User avatar
Apatosaurus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 944
Founded: Jul 17, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Apatosaurus » Wed Feb 09, 2022 6:38 pm

Yeah, I honestly think one region coming back isn't worthy of a declaration. If anything a Condemnation of BoM would be more appropriate (and could be interesting, though I also don't know much about the place so I can't really say whether they deserve it or not).

Fhaengshia wrote:Maybe it's not fully clear, but this declaration is about how despite raiders losing occasional pilers such as TNP and TEP their numbers have been rising and raiderdom is explicitly in ascendency lately. Even at the tail end of last year over 200 nations on both sides took part in China, but the region was liberated just 24 hrs after the occupation began. TMC has more than that number just in the occupying pile.

If you can refocus this to be more about the state of R/D these days, I would be quite open to the idea. Good luck either way :)
Last edited by Apatosaurus on Wed Feb 09, 2022 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This signature stands with Palestine.

End the continued practice of bombing houses, museums, refugee camps, ambulances, and churches.
WA Ambassador: Ambrose Scott; further detail on WA delegation in factbooks. Nation overview.

User avatar
Fhaengshia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 129
Founded: Apr 30, 2020
Anarchy

Postby Fhaengshia » Wed Feb 09, 2022 6:57 pm

Outer Sparta wrote:...but if you wish to continue, then you need to do some more research on BoM.

Apatosaurus wrote:Yeah, I honestly think one region coming back isn't worthy of a declaration.

I updated the draft to make it appear less BoM centric as it had been comprehended so.

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15106
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Outer Sparta » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm

Fhaengshia wrote:
Tinhampton wrote:1. Where are the "unaligned and independent" pilers in The Mystical Council?
2. Bold defender opposition... such as being regularly outnumbered two-to-one in TMC. Very much.

1. Both TWPAF and PRAF are independent, I'm not 100% sure on the exact term some of the other pilers use, but removing/changing 'unaligned' is a pretty easy fix.
2. Hence "a rallying call".

Outer Sparta wrote:I don't know if this is really necessary to do, but if you wish to continue, then you need to do some more research on BoM. I assume you haven't been on this site before 2020, but this region has been around for a while and contains big raider names like Reventus Koth. Personally, I think a condemnation might be better suited, but that goes into different territory whether or not they are actually commendable or not.

You're right I haven't been here before 2020. This is very much NOT a condemnation, I know that C&Cs would require much more specific details. This is really just tangential to BoM as can be seen as the numbers in TMC aren't massively different to ALH.

Maybe it's not fully clear, but this declaration is about how despite raiders losing occasional pilers such as TNP and TEP their numbers have been rising and raiderdom is explicitly in ascendency lately. Even at the tail end of last year over 200 nations on both sides took part in China, but the region was liberated just 24 hrs after the occupation began. TMC has more than that number just in the occupying pile.

If the consensus is that this isn't what declarations are for, then I'm not fussed at all. I feel an opinion such as this is part of what declarations are all about, there is considerable unexplored area for the suitability of declarations after all.

In my opinion, I don't think a declaration on the revival of a raiding region would work. I remember Tinhampton doing a declaration on the raid of China and that got shot down pretty quickly.
Free Palestine, stop the genocide in Gaza

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Thu Feb 10, 2022 1:38 am

Personally I don’t think this is going to work at the present time. Nothing wrong with the writing, which is good, but I think the concept is not right.

If you’re going for something that focusses on BoM then I believe that would be better served by a Condemnation. Alternatively if this is a celebration of a revival of a raiding region, then I think you need to wait and see how this current raid pans out.

If you intend this as a paean to raider unity then that will need a bit of a longer timescale. The tricky thing with this type of Declaration is that timing is everything. As Tinhampton found with their China Declaration today’s news is tomorrow’s fish and chip paper.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Guess and Check
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 147
Founded: Mar 26, 2018
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Guess and Check » Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:01 am

I agree with BBD

A condemnation of BoM would be better instead of a declaration on them. As for a revival of raider unity, it would be best to wait a bit longer to see more of what raiders do and if their current streak of success continues. I'd say maybe another two months at least, as an arbitrary timeframe? Or even longer

but either way seems well written, although admittedly haven't read it at depth yet
Just the weirdo known as Zukchiva Spartan Yura.
Guessing is fine if you don't know the answer!
"Are you ok zuk" - Halley
“Posts a wall of text, mentions he can elaborate more. Classic Zuk.”- Bach
“who the fuck is zukchiva lol”- Virgolia
“note to self: zuk is a traitor who must be silenced”- Atlae
“I vote that Zukchiva is kicked off the island”- Algerstonia
"everyone ban zuk"- AMOM
"i've come to the conclusion that zuk cannot pronounce words"- Euricanis
"no we blame zuk for everything now"- Catiania
"zuk is just an idiot" - Vor
"Zuk is absolutely a failure" - Vara
"Zuk's been made illegal? pog" - Boro

Proud member of The East Pacific, The Union of Democratic States, and Refugia!


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads