NationStates

The Security Council,

Noting Whiskany is a nation that is the Founder of The Federation Of Utopias Unitum, which was founded Late February, 2021, and is important to may regions and nations.

Recognizing Whiskany has done many good things to their region and others, such as:
i. Advanced the roles of fellow nations giving them a place to make the name for themselves that they seek.
ii. Held strong holding the former International Dictators Coalition together through radical challenges and challengers, had also held off many raids until the fractured region was challenged and defeated.
iii. Held the former region Disciples of Christ together through many trying challenges until ultimately the region was disbanded by the founder and closed.
iv. Helped the former region The Territories of the Asmor Federation move to The Federation Of Utopias Unitum after having been raided, and gave home to many nations who moved.

Praising Whiskany for protecting multiple regions and holding off raids, as well as supporting nation's in their roles and keeping their region secure and safe. Also forging strong connections with other regions and strong nations.

Applauding Whiskany for carrying on after the fall of their former region, The Federal Socialist Republic and creating another region that has had substantial growth over the past months, getting 70+ Nations in their region.

Concluding that Whiskany is worthy of praise due to their actions,

Hereby Commends, Whiskany

This nominee isn't commendable - most of these regions either don't exist or are small passworded UCRs that have never had inter-regional significance. In particular,

Polomon Islands wrote:ii. Held strong holding the former International Dictators Coalition together through radical challenges and challengers, had also held off many raids until the fractured region was challenged and defeated by the MT army.

I don't know if this was intended, but I read this as them defending a region they were part of against the MT Army?

If so, that's an immediate & unequivocal disqualifier. We don't commend people who fight against anti-fascists, especially when they're members of regions targeted by Antifa.

Andusre wrote:This nominee isn't commendable - most of these regions either don't exist or are small passworded UCRs that have never had inter-regional significance. In particular,

Polomon Islands wrote:ii. Held strong holding the former International Dictators Coalition together through radical challenges and challengers, had also held off many raids until the fractured region was challenged and defeated by the MT army.

I don't know if this was intended, but I read this as them defending a region they were part of against the MT Army?

If so, that's an immediate & unequivocal disqualifier. We don't commend people who fight against anti-fascists, especially when they're members of regions targeted by Antifa.

So remove MT Army?

Polomon Islands wrote:

Andusre wrote:This nominee isn't commendable - most of these regions either don't exist or are small passworded UCRs that have never had inter-regional significance. In particular,

I don't know if this was intended, but I read this as them defending a region they were part of against the MT Army?

If so, that's an immediate & unequivocal disqualifier. We don't commend people who fight against anti-fascists, especially when they're members of regions targeted by Antifa.

So remove MT Army?

If I'm being honest, I'd just ditch this. I don't like raining on parades but it's just not feasible to pass this whether the MT Army is mentioned or not. The fact they were part of a region that was ever a target of the MT Army is a red flag of huge proportions.

Andusre wrote:

Polomon Islands wrote:So remove MT Army?

If I'm being honest, I'd just ditch this. I don't like raining on parades but it's just not feasible to pass this whether the MT Army is mentioned or not. The fact they were part of a region that was ever a target of the MT Army is a red flag of huge proportions.

I feel like improving this, but seeing you saying "Ditch", just makes me think this was a plane wreck.

Rick Perry wrote:SUPPORT

What are your reasons for support?

Polomon Islands wrote:

Rick Perry wrote:SUPPORT

What are your reasons for support?

He has protected and provided for many regions with his raids. In my opinion he is (other than The Black Hawks the most dangerous man to fear. So for this I say SUPPORT

AGAINST. The founder isn't commendable since they let homophobes into the region.

Rick Perry wrote:

Polomon Islands wrote:What are your reasons for support?

He has protected and provided for many regions with his raids. In my opinion he is (other than The Black Hawks the most dangerous man to fear. So for this I say SUPPORT

Ok Then, supporting is your choice and I respect it.

Unkzier wrote:AGAINST. The founder isn't commendable since they let homophobes into the region.

They aren't homophobes

Unkzier wrote:AGAINST. The founder isn't commendable since they let homophobes into the region.

What Homophobes?

Polomon Islands wrote:

Unkzier wrote:AGAINST. The founder isn't commendable since they let homophobes into the region.

What Homophobes?

Rick and Grande

Polomon Islands wrote:

Unkzier wrote:AGAINST. The founder isn't commendable since they let homophobes into the region.

What Homophobes?

I am pretty sure he is Kings isle

Not a Commendable nominee, not a well written draft. Next.

Concur with everything Andy (and BBD) said. Not exactly the arbiter of right here, but uh...nothing here is commendable.

Unkzier wrote:

Polomon Islands wrote:What Homophobes?

Rick and Grande

Im talking about Whiskany's past history and the great things they have done, not them allowing homophobes into the region.

Against. Just seems like you are trying to glorify your new region's founder.

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Not a Commendable nominee, not a well written draft. Next.

Can you at least give some advice instead of dumping on this proposal

Polomon Islands wrote:

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Not a Commendable nominee, not a well written draft. Next.

Can you at least give some advice instead of dumping on this proposal

We are "dumping" on it because it's bad.

Untecna wrote:

Polomon Islands wrote:Can you at least give some advice instead of dumping on this proposal

We are "dumping" on it because it's bad.

Well if you would give advice it wouldn't be bad.
And getting rid of it is not advice

Rick Perry wrote:

Untecna wrote:We are "dumping" on it because it's bad.

Well if you would give advice it wouldn't be bad.
And getting rid of it is not advice

Is there some type of GA and SC school or something to learn?
Cause clearly dumping on a proposal does not help them learn at all.

Rick Perry wrote:

Untecna wrote:We are "dumping" on it because it's bad.

Well if you would give advice it wouldn't be bad.
And getting rid of it is not advice

Nothing in it is commendable. It's just a glorification of someone for no reason.

It would be better scrapped.

Polomon Islands wrote:

Rick Perry wrote:Well if you would give advice it wouldn't be bad.
And getting rid of it is not advice

Is there some type of GA and SC school or something to learn?
Cause clearly dumping on a proposal does not help them learn at all.

Take your time, do your research, find actual topics or nations to address, and just wait. If a proposal is a dumpster fire there's no need for us to give any advice because there is no need for it. In that case, it needs scrapping.

Polomon Islands wrote:

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Not a Commendable nominee, not a well written draft. Next.

Can you at least give some advice instead of dumping on this proposal

Why? There is no advice I could give that would suddenly make the nominee Commendable. And I’m certainly not going to waste my time trying to improve your writing.