NATION

PASSWORD

[Abandoned] Declaration on Internet Safety

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Terra Animo
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Oct 29, 2021
Moralistic Democracy

[Abandoned] Declaration on Internet Safety

Postby Terra Animo » Tue Nov 09, 2021 5:55 pm

Declaration on Internet Safety

Security Council,

Addressing the multitude of dangers of the internet,

Defining some of the previously mentioned dangers as scam pop-ups, identity theft attempts, and malicious viruses,

Recognizing the incredibly complex legal statutes surrounding these topics and the multitude of failed GA proposals regarding the issue,

Shying from the idea of attempting to legally abolish these practices,

Yet cognizant that the dangers of the internet still need to be addressed,

Yearning to lessen the amount of people victimized by organizations and individuals of ill intent across the internet,

Wishing to inform all peoples who belong to nations of the World Assembly of the following precautions which can be taken to avoid being taken advantage via the internet,

1.Being hyper aware of whom you share any banking information with,

2.Being prudent when deciding whether or not to open attachments sent to you via email from email addresses you do not recognize,

3.Being weary of ever granting “remote access” of any personal device to anyone you do not personally know,

4.Being cautious about whom you share any personal information with, such as one's legal name, address, place of work, or government issued I.D details (if applicable to one’s nation),

Hereby recommends that WA member nations share this information, as well as any other useful information or advice regarding the protection of oneself when using the internet.
Last edited by Terra Animo on Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Terra Animo
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Oct 29, 2021
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Terra Animo » Tue Nov 09, 2021 5:56 pm

Looking forward to hearing any thoughts on this draft!

User avatar
Tinhampton
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9366
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Anarchy

Postby Tinhampton » Tue Nov 09, 2021 5:58 pm

Glad to see you haven't rushed to submit this like you did the one about drinking water.

Why do you believe this is best suited for an SC Declaration rather than a GA proposal?
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 319,372): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375
Other achievements: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; possibly very controversial; "Tinhampton? the man's literally god"
Who am I, really? 46yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate; currently reading National Populism by Roger Eatwell and Matthew Goodwin

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13143
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Outer Sparta » Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:01 pm

Again, something more suited in the GA. Not every concept is worthy of an SC declaration you know.
social democracy, environmental protection, universal healthcare, free college, social equality, LGBT, pro-choice,
GOP, corporate socialism, Trump, neoconservatism, white supremacy, extreme political views, corruption

User avatar
Terra Animo
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Oct 29, 2021
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Terra Animo » Tue Nov 09, 2021 7:02 pm

Tinhampton wrote:Glad to see you haven't rushed to submit this like you did the one about drinking water.

Why do you believe this is best suited for an SC Declaration rather than a GA proposal?

I have looked over many of the previous GA drafts on the issue of internet safety and observed that the vast majority of them were shut down. Enforcing wide-sweeping laws regarding internet safety is incredibly difficult, as evident by the fact that scams and such are so prevalent in the real world, and feel as if attempting to tackle the issue is borderline impossible. Therefore, I feel as if a PSA of sorts is better suited to address the issue.
Last edited by Terra Animo on Tue Nov 09, 2021 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Terra Animo
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Oct 29, 2021
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Terra Animo » Tue Nov 09, 2021 7:06 pm

Outer Sparta wrote:Again, something more suited in the GA. Not every concept is worthy of an SC declaration you know.

I feel as if this is rather clearly written as a PSA of sorts, and is in no way binding, as it is, again, not meant to be. If a PSA regarding hippopotamuses can not only reach quorum, but also be passed, it seems rather perplexing to me that a well-written (which I am not currently claiming this document to be) PSA regarding internet security would not be worthy of SC approval.

User avatar
Astrobolt
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 183
Founded: Jul 30, 2019
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Astrobolt » Tue Nov 09, 2021 7:23 pm

Is this meant to be a PSA for the player base?
He/Him
Ambassador to the WA: Mr. Reede Tappe
In the WA IC, despite not being in it OOC.


Note: All views expressed are solely my own, and don't represent any region, organization or group unless stated otherwise.

For a detailed list of positions, and other things of note, click here.

User avatar
Terra Animo
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Oct 29, 2021
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Terra Animo » Tue Nov 09, 2021 7:26 pm

Astrobolt wrote:Is this meant to be a PSA for the player base?

No, for the citizens of WA nations. I suppose I could throw the word citizens somewhere in the document to ensure it is not misunderstood to be meta-gaming.

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Minister
 
Posts: 3190
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:14 am

Terra Animo wrote:Looking forward to hearing any thoughts on this draft!

I see that you’ve decided to put writing actual GA legislation into the “too hard” basket and instead have drafted another very poorly written declaration.

And you’ve an obvious typo in the title of your opening post.

Hard against.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs. Currently Guardian and Security Council Advisor for The West Pacific.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart

Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

User avatar
Terra Animo
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Oct 29, 2021
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Terra Animo » Wed Nov 10, 2021 5:51 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
Terra Animo wrote:Looking forward to hearing any thoughts on this draft!

I see that you’ve decided to put writing actual GA legislation into the “too hard” basket and instead have drafted another very poorly written declaration.

And you’ve an obvious typo in the title of your opening post.

Hard against.


Thanks for the response.

User avatar
Terra Animo
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Oct 29, 2021
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Terra Animo » Wed Nov 10, 2021 7:52 am

Any continued thoughts on the draft are welcome from all!

User avatar
Astrobolt
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 183
Founded: Jul 30, 2019
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Astrobolt » Wed Nov 10, 2021 11:23 am

Terra Animo wrote:
Astrobolt wrote:Is this meant to be a PSA for the player base?

No, for the citizens of WA nations. I suppose I could throw the word citizens somewhere in the document to ensure it is not misunderstood to be meta-gaming.


If it is meant to be for the citizens of WA nations directly, then this something that is more under the purview of the GA.
He/Him
Ambassador to the WA: Mr. Reede Tappe
In the WA IC, despite not being in it OOC.


Note: All views expressed are solely my own, and don't represent any region, organization or group unless stated otherwise.

For a detailed list of positions, and other things of note, click here.

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13143
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Outer Sparta » Wed Nov 10, 2021 11:24 am

Astrobolt wrote:
Terra Animo wrote:No, for the citizens of WA nations. I suppose I could throw the word citizens somewhere in the document to ensure it is not misunderstood to be meta-gaming.


If it is meant to be for the citizens of WA nations directly, then this something that is more under the purview of the GA.

In the GA, you have more opportunities to address that issue, and a declaration simply doesn't do anything compared to GA legislation.
social democracy, environmental protection, universal healthcare, free college, social equality, LGBT, pro-choice,
GOP, corporate socialism, Trump, neoconservatism, white supremacy, extreme political views, corruption


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dusandria Founder, Fujai, HumanSanity, Praeceps, Roavin, Sky Point, Tinhampton

Advertisement

Remove ads