[DRAFT] On the Existence of Warzones

[New Quebecshire]

It’s not a major concern for me, though I would like some general clarification - what is a "native" as it comes to warzones? My impression (might be wrong) is that natives in UCRs are the nations who originally inhabited the region as recruited by or alongside the founder, but if warzones don't have normal founders, what is a "native" warzone government?

This is something I am hoping to find a satisfactory definition on when I speak to some more Warzoners as feasible. An important question for sure.

I think you ought to change your title. https://imperiumanglorum.wordpress.com/2019/04/01/against-titles-starting-with-on/

Don't worry IA, I definitely want to change the title

You have my word that if it's submitted, it will have an improved title!

[Jutsa]

You have my word that if it's submitted, it will have an improved title!

Not saying this is a good title, but there's something amusing to the tone of "Battle for the Defense of Warzones"

[Karteria]

This is something I am hoping to find a satisfactory definition on when I speak to some more Warzoners as feasible. An important question for sure.

Not that my take is critical, but my impression when reading the draft is that "native" in the Warzone context is less about who came first and more about how established (and for how long) the government is. A native government would be well-established for a long period of time.

While I still believe there is benefit to recognizing the sovereignty of Warzones as equivalent to other regions, this also might be something to consider when crafting a definition:

The sovereignty of Warzones comes from endorsements and good foreign policy, not some inherent native rights.

[Quebecshire]

I've implemented a number of edits and added a definition for native governments at the suggestion of Karteria, who has come on as a co-author.