The Security Council,
Documenting the creation of the World Assembly as a unicameral body on April 6, 2008, and the introduction of commendations and condemnations as the basis for the Security Council on May 27, 2009,
Noting that while the World Assembly evolved to bicameralism on June 9, 2009, there was no formal recognition between the General Assembly and the Security Council, despite flying a shared flag,
Believing that the brief mentions that this chamber has given its counterpart does not do the General Assembly justice, given the vast web of legislation passed by its denizens,
The following is found:
- The General Assembly is formally recognized as the adjacent chamber to the Security Council, under the overarching organization of the World Assembly;
- The General Assembly is responsible for the passage of international legislation affecting all members of the World Assembly, to be voted on and debated by these members in its entirety;
- As an entity, the General Assembly and the Security Council remain equal in their overall power and influence, regardless of the way that this influence is disbursed or otherwise utilized;
- In the joining of either World Assembly chamber, membership to both chambers is granted and the rights and duties thereof are expected to be adhered to in their entirety;
- An active disavowment of either chamber of the World Assembly should be considered a disavowment of both, with the full consequences being incurred upon the offender.
If you couldn't tell, I'm a bit out of practice with my authorship skills. Regardless, I feel like a topic along these lines would be something fun and help create a more intimate intertwining in terms of roleplay between the two chambers. It's not particularly long, but I didn't want to draw it out. Let me know your thoughts, I won't be hurt if it's not well-received; that's the fun of a new category, after all.