I don't normally post in the Security Council, though I would agree that you can commend someone for some aspect of their actions, while also condemning them for the aspects of those actions that were condemnable.Cormactopia Prime wrote:Sandaoguo wrote:Imki hasn't been involved in TSP for many, many years and her "contributions" to our community were a net negative.
She hasn't been involved there because you and your ilk chase people out whom you don't like. Full stop.
Full support in principle for commending Imki. The draft needs some work, but what it doesn't need is Imki's contributions to TSP omitted because Glen would like it to be so. I don't even think some of Glen's political allies in TSP would agree with his take on this as some of them have worked closely with Imki in the past.
Question is what part or point of time were her actions in TSP condemnable, and at what point where they commendable?
I think it would need work on what precise actions in TSP within those positions was commendable, so that it doesn't distract or deny from anything that might have been condemnable actions while in those positions.
It should not be ignored that a player can be commended while also not denying they have done things that are condemnable.
Edit: I've been hearing this part is objectively true:
So this language could be worked on.Admiring Imkiville's contributions to the South Pacific, serving asVice-Delegate, Local Councilor, andMinister of Military Affairs, and that during its tenure as Minister of Military Affairs, they are credited with the revival of the South Pacific Special Forces, allowing it to reach its potential as a powerful force,