NationStates

Since the author was careless to make an SC thread, I am making one for him.

Condemn Traden
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Nominee: Traden
Proposed By: Greataz

The General Assembly, after exacts the following discoveries of Traden’s Evil Acts :

Disgusted by the fact that Traden Spammed International Defense Shield Force’s Region Message Board with puppets under disguise that he owns them secretly

Terrifed that he did this all in the time pretending to be allied International Defense Shield Force by being a member in his main nation Traden

Outraged By The Fact that they offer low political freedoms to their own populace, showing no effort to be a democracy and instead struck theirselves with evil dictators

Suspicious that Traden was once and still a member of that region, giving him rights to abuse his power and conduct further notorious acts on the region and organization

The Security Council Herby Condemns Traden.

Also, here is the proposal link: https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1621385645

"His main nation Traden".

Illegal for 2b in 3... 2... 1...

Picairn wrote:"His main nation Traden".

Illegal for branding in 3... 2... 1...

Not violating 4b at all.

Traden wrote:

Picairn wrote:"His main nation Traden".

Illegal for branding in 3... 2... 1...

Not violating 4b at all.

But it violates the fourth wall rule. Unless that is 4b, I forget. Still illegal.

Terribly-written and illegal. You really don't seem to take it seriously do you?

Minskiev wrote:

Traden wrote:
Not violating 4b at all.

But it violates the fourth wall rule. Unless that is 4b, I forget. Still illegal.

Yes, it violated fourth wall rule.

Outer Sparta wrote:Terribly-written and illegal. You really don't seem to take it seriously do you?

I am not even the author of this proposal, so back it off.

Traden wrote:Not violating 4b at all.

My bad, it's 2b, the Real World rule.

Traden wrote:

Minskiev wrote:
But it violates the fourth wall rule. Unless that is 4b, I forget. Still illegal.

Yes, it violated fourth wall rule.

Outer Sparta wrote:Terribly-written and illegal. You really don't seem to take it seriously do you?

I am not even the author of this proposal, so back it off.

You did, however, submit a terribly-written condemnation of IDSF.

Outer Sparta wrote:

Traden wrote:

Yes, it violated fourth wall rule.



I am not even the author of this proposal, so back it off.

You did, however, submit a terribly-written condemnation of IDSF.

Oh, cool. Now, let me create a thread for THAT proposal so you can chit-chatter in it.

Picairn wrote:

Traden wrote:Not violating 4b at all.

My bad, it's 2b, the Real World rule.

Yes, it violates that rule.

Traden wrote:

Outer Sparta wrote:You did, however, submit a terribly-written condemnation of IDSF.

Oh, cool. Now, let me create a thread for THAT proposal so you can chit-chatter in it.

Generally you're supposed to draft resolutions on the forums. Lemme just say it here: you are not a condemnable nominee (don't know where the author of the proposal is getting that from) and neither is the region you wrote a condemnation on.

Outer Sparta wrote:Terribly-written and illegal. You really don't seem to take it seriously do you?

Bro just write a diss track against illegal proposals

Great Algerstonia wrote:

Outer Sparta wrote:Terribly-written and illegal. You really don't seem to take it seriously do you?

Bro just write a diss track against illegal proposals

A thread of this one isn't really necessary. Besides, it will get marked illegally anyway.

Traden wrote:

Outer Sparta wrote:You did, however, submit a terribly-written condemnation of IDSF.

Oh, cool. Now, let me create a thread for THAT proposal so you can chit-chatter in it.

Nah, don’t bother I saw it, it was crap.

Anyway, this one has been consigned to the dustbin by the Mods.

I mean shame on the author for writing a terribly written condemn, but genuinely picking on some kids in a tiny region isn't cool either, Traden. So both the author and you are totally bad actors in this travesty and waste of time.

It would help both parties involved - the authoring party as well as the nominated party - to step away from drafting for a while and instead observe how others write proposals, or study proposals that have already passed.

I say this because I perceive a lack of maturity from both parties involved in this mud throwing contest, that works detrimental to how both are perceived in the NationStates. If it's their wish to create such a reputation for themselves, so be it. Yet then neither parties should look up strangely if their drafts are commented on negatively.

Outer Sparta wrote:

Traden wrote:
Oh, cool. Now, let me create a thread for THAT proposal so you can chit-chatter in it.

Generally you're supposed to draft resolutions on the forums. Lemme just say it here: you are not a condemnable nominee (don't know where the author of the proposal is getting that from) and neither is the region you wrote a condemnation on.

I, on the other hand, am a commendable nominee, and have contributed many commendable actions on the NationStates. I therefore, deserve a fine commendation.

Team Lennox wrote:

Outer Sparta wrote:Generally you're supposed to draft resolutions on the forums. Lemme just say it here: you are not a condemnable nominee (don't know where the author of the proposal is getting that from) and neither is the region you wrote a condemnation on.

I, on the other hand, am a commendable nominee, and have contributed many commendable actions on the NationStates. I therefore, deserve a fine commendation.

I, on the other hand, am often condemning innocent nations such as you via my puppet Brikoving, and have done so much havoc. I therefore, belive you deserve a bad condemnation.

Traden wrote:

Team Lennox wrote:I, on the other hand, am a commendable nominee, and have contributed many commendable actions on the NationStates. I therefore, deserve a fine commendation.

I, on the other hand, am often condemning innocent nations such as you via my puppet Brikoving, and have done so much havoc. I therefore, belive you deserve a bad condemnation.

No I don't

Team Lennox wrote:

Traden wrote:
I, on the other hand, am often condemning innocent nations such as you via my puppet Brikoving, and have done so much havoc. I therefore, belive you deserve a bad condemnation.

No I don't

Hokay, condemnation it is!