The Security Council,
GRANTING that the crimes attributed to Blackhelm Confederacy in SC # 59 are documented
AGREEING with the original resolution that the crimes of Blackhelm Confederacy are indeed immoral acts that should be in principle condemned by and opposed by this body,
NOTING, however, that the crimes attributed to this nation are neither exceptional nor noteworthy in of themselves,
DRAWING ATTENTION TO, the Security Council's precedent of repealing resolutions commending or condemning nations that are, regardless of their moral character, unexceptional, as established in the repeals of SC #1, SC #43, SC # 44, SC #45, SC #79, SC #86, SC #107, SC #158, SC #220, SC #249 and SC #336,
ASSERTING that the writing of SC #59 is middling at best and amateurish at worst, running counter to the many and sundry excellently written resolutions passed by this august body,
SPECIFICALLY NOTING the repeals of SC #43, SC #123, SC #184, SC #187, SC #192, SC #299, SC #300, SC #302, SC #336 and SC #342 all include references to the poor quality either in writing or argumentation of the repealed resolutions, all of which establish a further precedent that the Security Council values well-written and well-argued proposals,
ADDITIONALLY NOTING that the above argument is further emphasized by the fact that in the case of the repeals of SC #44, SC #123, SC #184, SC #300, as well as in other instances, better resolutions were later proposed that performed a much better job of accomplishing their stated objectives,
INFORMING the World Assembly that Blackhelm Confederacy has done very little internationally in recent years, and has largely lapsed into effective isolation, rendering it of minimal threat to the world at large in the modern day,
FINALLY NOTING that multiple Security Council Condemnations, including but not limited to SC #37, SC #42, SC #56, SC #105, SC #122 and SC #127 were repealed when the nations or regions condemned ceased to be a threat to international or interregional good order,
CONCLUDING that SC #59 therefore violates several established precedents of the Security Council requiring quality, content and targets of its condemnations and commendations,
BELIEVING that it is incumbent on the Security Council to ensure that its resolutions reflect only the highest standards of writing and argumentation
Hereby repeals SC #59 Condemn Blackhelm Confederacy
While trawling through SC resolutions looking for a specific one about a week ago, I stumbled across this resolution from 2011. I was stunned it was still on the books because a lot of old, not very well written resolutions have long since been repealed in one form or another. And this one is really not very well written, nor exceptionally remarkable - roleplay condemnations are all well and good, but most of the ones that still stand were both better written and reflect much more specific and noteworthy immoral acts. Examples being: both Condemnations of Milograd (X, X) Condemn Automagfreak (X) and more recently, the condemnations of Tinfect (X) and United World Order (X)
The resolution wouldn't get out of my head, so I decided I might as well try my hand at a repeal. There's no real stakes about this, apart from the fact that the original resolution offends me on an aesthetic level, but that seemed like a good enough reason to do the repeal to me. Maybe Blackhelm really deserves a condemnation - those roleplay threads linked in the referenced original SC thread (see below) didn't seem to support that, but maybe there's better evidence elsewhere, or since.
Of course, having never written an SC resolution before, and not being a roleplayer versed in the customs of roleplaying or roleplay condemnations, this could be a terribly written repeal, or maybe the guy really deserves the condemnation as a badge for being a standout player, as happens with skilled 'evil' Gameplayers. Still feels like if he deserves a condemnation, he deserves a better one, but that's why this is still just a draft.
Anyway, here is the original SC Thread where it was debated/discussed, which also contains the links to the various evidence the author drew on. it's also worth noting that nearly all the nations Blackhelm Confederacy offended against are also now CTE, but I couldn't find a good way to weave that in.