(DRAFT) Condemn Varanius

[Traden]

Noting that the World Assembly and Security Council promises to help the world,

Realizing, however, that Varanius does nothing more than hurt the world,

Reminding of the proposals that Varanius submits via proxy nation A Melted Instant Pot Lid, nominating innocent nations for condemnations such as Dilber and Quebecshire,

Hating the unprofessionalism and useless points Varanius uses with its proxy nation, such as "HORRIFIED OH WAIT ALREADY USED THAT",

Horrified of Varanius' various attempts to make no region safe,

Summarizing that Varanius does harm to the world and is in need of a condemnation to stop this,

The World Assembly and Security Council hereby condemns Varanius.

[Rabbitz]

Is this serious, or a joke?

[Jedinsto]

no

[Traden]

Is this serious, or a joke?

It's serious.

no

Insufficent.

[Jedinsto]

sufficient.

[Minskiev]

gameplay

[Outer Sparta]

Terrible draft.

[Daarwyrth]

OOC: This Condemnation just has no effort put into it. It has a few generic statements about someone writing a bad proposal, but unfortunately this draft isn't shining through with quality either.

If you're serious about writing a Condemnation, Commendation, or heck, any other piece of writing, you have to put in the effort. Do you research, work your plan out. Don't just go for the proverbial lowest hanging fruit, and instead put in the work. Because writing down a few generic statements is easy, but far from good. If you want to write something that's good, you need to go a little further than this. And by "a little" I mean "a lot".

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

If writing piss-poor C&Cs was a Condemnable action, then based on the evidence of your draft you would up for one too.

Your draft is badly written, unoriginal and opportunistic.

[BlazeFirexd]

well try to make it much more worthy to gain support

well choosing the right guy to condemn to helps like for eaxample if u condemn me u gain a lot of supporters

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

well try to make it much more worthy to gain support

well choosing the right guy to condemn to helps like for eaxample if u condemn me u gain a lot of supporters

Incorrect - actions that have necessitated Moderator involvement are not Condemnable and mentioning them would be illegal under SC rules.

You might want to read up on those sometime.

[BlazeFirexd]

well try to make it much more worthy to gain support

well choosing the right guy to condemn to helps like for eaxample if u condemn me u gain a lot of supporters

Incorrect - actions that have necessitated Moderator involvement are not Condemnable and mentioning them would be illegal under SC rules.

You might want to read up on those sometime.

yea sure its not like i am here since 2003

[Mallorea and Riva]

well try to make it much more worthy to gain support

well choosing the right guy to condemn to helps like for eaxample if u condemn me u gain a lot of supporters

Incorrect - actions that have necessitated Moderator involvement are not Condemnable and mentioning them would be illegal under SC rules.

You might want to read up on those sometime.

I'll quibble with that because it's 6:30am on a Saturday and I'm still half asleep.

It could be possible to cite illegal actions in SC proposals, though it's tricky. One example that could be allowed (if worded correctly) would be mentioning in a Liberation resolution that the target region was invaded using multies.

But you're right to point out that no one would condemn Blazefirexd, regardless of whether or not they could do so legally.

With respect to the resolution itself, it seems we're in the SC cycle where the reactionaries push back on semi-meme resolutions with even lower quality resolutions.
We're getting deep into the meta now.

[BlazeFirexd]

Incorrect - actions that have necessitated Moderator involvement are not Condemnable and mentioning them would be illegal under SC rules.

You might want to read up on those sometime.

I'll quibble with that because it's 6:30am on a Saturday and I'm still half asleep.

It could be possible to cite illegal actions in SC proposals, though it's tricky. One example that could be allowed (if worded correctly) would be mentioning in a Liberation resolution that the target region was invaded using multies.

But you're right to point out that no one would condemn Blazefirexd, regardless of whether or not they could do so legally.

With respect to the resolution itself, it seems we're in the SC cycle where the reactionaries push back on semi-meme resolutions with even lower quality resolutions.
We're getting deep into the meta now.

Thanks man

[Varanius]

And for once, it wasn’t me!