NationStates

Seeing as this proposal is 8 approvals away from quorum, I've created a thread for the proposal created by Levroux. Edit: This proposal is now at Quorum.

Condemn KIDS Country
By Levroux

The World Assembly,
NOTING KIDS Country lack of originality,

Hereby condemns KIDS Country

If this is for the memes, sure.

Another terrible joke proposal nears the queue. What even has KIDS Country done?

This proposal is itself largely a copycat of the nominee's own proposal to Condemn Dilber (not to be confused with A Melted Instant Pot Lid's draft). KIDS Country itself has sent out no less than two campaign telegrams for this proposal - the following at 19:31:08 GMT on Tuesday:

And the following at 21:39:07 GMT on Wednesday:

for christ's sake

I doubt that this would make it to vote.

Jedinsto wrote:for christ's sake

I get the Dilber condemnation is more or less a joke (a puppet nation of some nation who knows about TWP created that) but at least Dilber is more well-known. I don't know what this nominee has done other than the terrible proposal saying "lack of originality" by some badge-hunter.

Outer Sparta wrote:

Jedinsto wrote:for christ's sake

I get the Dilber condemnation is more or less a joke (a puppet nation of some nation who knows about TWP created that) but at least Dilber is more well-known. I don't know what this nominee has done other than the terrible proposal saying "lack of originality" by some badge-hunter.

Context: Before the proposal that was up on vote was created, there was a joke "Condemn Dilber" proposal made by Kids Country. The text:

Noting Dilber lack of originality,
Hereby Condemns Dilber.

This is a joke reply to the above proposal.

Drew Durrnil wrote:

Outer Sparta wrote:I get the Dilber condemnation is more or less a joke (a puppet nation of some nation who knows about TWP created that) but at least Dilber is more well-known. I don't know what this nominee has done other than the terrible proposal saying "lack of originality" by some badge-hunter.

Context: Before the proposal that was up on vote was created, there was a joke "Condemn Dilber" proposal made by Kids Country. The text:

Noting Dilber lack of originality,
Hereby Condemns Dilber.

This is a joke reply to the above proposal.

Still a tit-for-tat response that doesn't warrant any reason to vote for it.

I'm down

Great Algerstonia wrote:I'm down

So you support this terrible resolution? Why?

Outer Sparta wrote:

Great Algerstonia wrote:I'm down

So you support this terrible resolution? Why?

Alger is less serious than I am, and that’s saying something given the SC proposal currently at vote.

Varanius wrote:

Outer Sparta wrote:So you support this terrible resolution? Why?

Alger is less serious than I am, and that’s saying something given the SC proposal currently at vote.

Alger's supporting a joke proposal that's even less original than the Dilber one at vote. It also seems to be a copypasta but sub out one nation for another.

Outer Sparta wrote:Alger's supporting a joke proposal that's even less original than the Dilber one at vote.

I’ve chosen to take this as a compliment

Varanius wrote:

Outer Sparta wrote:Alger's supporting a joke proposal that's even less original than the Dilber one at vote.

I’ve chosen to take this as a compliment

Somehow I never thought you were behind that Dilber condemnation. At least that one had detail and is original unlike the KIDS Country condemnation submission.

Varanius wrote:

Outer Sparta wrote:Alger's supporting a joke proposal that's even less original than the Dilber one at vote.

I’ve chosen to take this as a compliment

It’s likely the only one you’re going to get Vara.

Anyway, let’s not discuss the proposal just pretend we did.

Drew Durrnil wrote:Context: Before the proposal that was up on vote was created, there was a joke "Condemn Dilber" proposal made by Kids Country. The text:

Noting Dilber lack of originality,
Hereby Condemns Dilber.

This is a joke reply to the above proposal.

If this is true then this is plagiarism. Got any proof?

Wrapper wrote:

Drew Durrnil wrote:Context: Before the proposal that was up on vote was created, there was a joke "Condemn Dilber" proposal made by Kids Country. The text:

Noting Dilber lack of originality,
Hereby Condemns Dilber.

This is a joke reply to the above proposal.

If this is true then this is plagiarism. Got any proof?

I flagged it for possible plagiarism. However, the proposal by KIDS Country condemning Dilber can no longer be accessed since it failed to reach quorom, but if someone managed to screenshot or copy the rest of that proposal, then it would clearly show.

Why

The Dream of Kirby wrote:Why

Because apparently people still want to write joke proposals and get them to queue. This one however lacks originality and seems to be a tit-for-tat response.

Outer Sparta wrote:

Jedinsto wrote:for christ's sake

I get the Dilber condemnation is more or less a joke (a puppet nation of some nation who knows about TWP created that) but at least Dilber is more well-known.

With respect, the Refugi IFV was a better joke than the resolution.

Refuge Isle wrote:

Outer Sparta wrote:I get the Dilber condemnation is more or less a joke (a puppet nation of some nation who knows about TWP created that) but at least Dilber is more well-known.

With respect, the Refugi IFV was a better joke than the resolution.

I can’t even disagree with you on that.

Varanius wrote:

Refuge Isle wrote:With respect, the Refugi IFV was a better joke than the resolution.

I can’t even disagree with you on that.

When I first heard of Dilber, I thought it was a parody nation of Dilbert the cartoon strip somehow.

I never want to see a joke proposal again. =_=

Xoriet wrote:I never want to see a joke proposal again. =_=

Makes you want to condemn This Game, huh?