NationStates

Sincluda wrote:The Security Council,

Concerned that: Nubt has repeatedly disregarded the rules and guidelines surrounding World Assembly proposals, including submitting multiple at a time. It seems that Nubt never bothered to look at the rules, and their countless proposals often were rejected for branding and lack of an operative clause, some of the more basic proposal rules.

Observing that: Nubt, upon founding their own region, The Free Federation Of Nubt required that those who joined to reclassify as a Colony as they would become colonies of Nubt. Nubt, following their rejected proposals, asked for nations in their region to not participate anymore with the World Assembly, although if they did, they would not be required to follow legislation passed (which is impossible). Coincidentally, Nubt ejected the World Assembly delegate without explanation. Taking away, or attempting to take away a nation's independence and liberty is not at all a good thing.

Noting that: Nubt deceived members of it's region by promising fair elections, despite having appointed their self president of the region and not holding a single election until they declared that there would be no more elections. Now, multiple nations have been banned simply for being World Assembly members, and all but one of the nations holding public office have been removed from their positions. Nubt no longer holds elections, if they ever planned to anyways.

Angered that: Nubt claims to have violated the strictest and most important World Assembly rule, and says that they created multiple nations to endorse their own and become the delegate of their region. This could be why Nubt later banned the new delegate, as they did not want anyone to hold that position, even if they could not. (They had left the Assembly at that time).

Hereby condemns Nubt.

Sincluda wrote:

Sincluda wrote:Yeah, I wasn't sure where to draw the line with the roleplay aspect of the Council and going meta. I figured since it was a draft I might as well be as lenient as possible.

If any of the secretariats reading this wouldn't accept it, now would be a good time to say so.

Nubt has repeatedly disregarded the rules and guidelines surrounding World Assembly proposals, including submitting multiple at a time. It seems that Nubt never bothered to look at the rules, and their countless proposals often were rejected for branding and lack of an operative clause, some of the more basic proposal rules.

Sincluda wrote:"They created multiple nations to endorse their own and become the delegate of their region..."
This is the most condemn-worthy thing and most meta, so also most likely to get this marked illegal.

Comfed wrote:

Sincluda wrote:"They created multiple nations to endorse their own and become the delegate of their region..."
This is the most condemn-worthy thing and most meta, so also most likely to get this marked illegal.

Additionally, rule violations (WA multiing) cannot be cited in SC proposals and should instead be reported through the getting help page instead of an SC proposal.

Sincluda wrote:New draft up.

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:The nominee is not condemnable, your draft 2 is illegal and badly written. Stop wasting everyone’s time and stick a fork in this now.

Sincluda wrote:

Nubt wrote:I agree, this is JUNK go GET A LIFE! Stop condemning people with illegal and unmoral topics and values. If you wanna do this, do this the right way. Nice try though!

This is one of the reason you deserve a condemnation.

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:To the OP: Condemnations are awarded to nations or regions who have played the bad guy well and for a long period of time. They are not awarded to nations who, allegedly, cheated the WA by multi-ing.

Sincluda wrote:

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:To the OP: Condemnations are awarded to nations or regions who have played the bad guy well and for a long period of time. They are not awarded to nations who, allegedly, cheated the WA by multi-ing.

I do see Nubt as someone playing a villain, but they definitely haven't for a long time. So probably not condemn-worhty, yeah. WA cheating wasn't the primary reason behind the condemnation actually, but I just included it.