First and foremost, I have indeed gotten permission from Tinhampton to draft this. Secondly, this is not in response to the resolution-at-vote, Condemn Northern Borland.
The World Assembly Security Council,
Observing that, within the hallowed chambers of this Assembly, there are certain Ambassadors who feel inclined to blemish resolutions with the mark of their nation and to cram the already-bursting drafting boards with useless filler-resolutions; none moreso than the infamous Tinhampton;
Decreeing that the heinous crimes of Tinhampton shall not go without being recognised; and therefore should be brought to the attention of the World Assembly therein; therefore
Bringing to attention the wrongdoings of Tinhampton, including but not limited to:
1. Criticising the slightest of nuances in World Assembly drafts, then proceeding to claim co-authorship if the aforementioned nuances are rectified;
2. Drafting countless resolutions consisting of a mere few lines, that, in practice, would simply do nothing but add unnecessary bureaucracy to the already stagnant commissions of this Body;
3. Insisting on continuing the aforementioned resolutions, despite putting little-to-no effort into the original work; even seeming to view the World Assembly as a joke rather than the undoubtedly serious organisation that it is;
Considering all of the above, the Security Council Hereby CONDEMNS Tinhampton.
I'm glad you like it! However, only the Author can propose it.
Drafts:
The World Assembly Security Council,
Observing that, within the hallowed chambers of this Assembly, there are certain Ambassadors who feel inclined to blemish resolutions with the mark of their nation and to cram the already-bursting drafting boards with useless filler-resolutions; none moreso than the infamous Tinhampton;
Decreeing that the heinous crimes of Tinhampton shall not go without being recognised; and therefore should be brought to the attention of the World Assembly therein; therefore
Bringing to attention the wrongdoings of Tinhampton, including but not limited to:
1. Criticising the slightest of nuances in World Assembly drafts, then proceeding to claim co-authorship if the aforementioned nuances are rectified;
2. Drafting countless resolutions consisting of a mere few lines, that, in practice, would simply do nothing but add unnecessary bureaucracy to the already stagnant commissions of this Body;
3. Insisting on continuing the aforementioned resolutions, despite putting little-to-no effort into the original work; even seeming to view the World Assembly as a joke rather than the undoubtedly serious organisation that it is;
Considering all of the above, the Security Council Hereby CONDEMNS Tinhampton.
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Tinhampton write it for you as well?
Forget it is my opinion, the SC is not going to Condemn someone for being a pain in the backside.
I have even more reasons to condemn you now so just get off this forum and let us be.
If you keep up your attitude to others nobody will talk to you, and you may get in trouble with mods. I recommend you stop.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 5:56 am
by Tinhampton
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Tinhampton write it for you as well?
No. I always CAPITALISE the first words of my clauses, always use the [list=1] tag instead of typing out "1. 2. 3." manually, and would recognise that Alexander Smith is properly our Delegate-Ambassador
6 minutes ago: The Republic of Smart Land withdrew a proposal from the WA Security Council titled "Condemn Tinhampton".
Good, you withdrew the plagiarized proposal. Why you thought it was a good idea to plagiarize it in the first place I have no idea.
Yeah. I think that this is a good time to say that plagiarizing WA proposals is NEVER a good idea, no matter who, no matter what the subject is.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 6:43 am
by Comfed
Honeydewistania wrote:You should enumerate all of Tinhampton’s defeated WA proposals. I think it’s a record number
Don’t do it yet - soon there will be another one
OOC: Some of her proposals are good in my opinion. All of them? No.
Not condemnable.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 6:53 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc
Honeydewistania wrote:If that means no more annoying Tinhampton drafts, full support.
No chance of that.
Let’s not give Tinhampton a badge, let’s just keep stomping on their proposals if and when they reach the vote.
On the draft itself there are very few specifics, just a lot of generalisations or filler as I like to call it. Shame the OP didn’t really do any research to back these up.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:55 am
by Tiberia Maritima
That seems to be the trend with Tinhampton proposals, little research and filler to burnish their reputation as a WA resolution author.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 5:41 am