NationStates

The Reason we Nominate The Freeland of Rhandon Is because they Sneeky ways of trying to undermine the Region of Sardovia by Using roleplay, which is Allowed but, they use it to provoke other nations to break the no War Rule on Sardovia! For Example, On the region of Sardovia, War is temporaryly banned until we have a bigger Amount of Nations. However, Rhandon Tries to provoke nations to break the rules and Start a War, to cause nations to leave the region. And every time they are warned not to do it Again they Re-Offend, All Rhandon wants to do is to cause Small Regions to completely fall Apart.
I was planning to take this proposal to the Security council but I Don't Quality to post proposals yet.

This doesn't have anything.

Herzgevenia wrote:The Reason we Nominate The Freeland of Rhandon Is because they Sneeky ways of trying to undermine the Region of Sardovia by Using roleplay, which is Allowed but, they use it to provoke other nations to break the no War Rule on Sardovia! For Example, On the region of Sardovia, War is temporaryly banned until we have a bigger Amount of Nations. However, Rhandon Tries to provoke nations to break the rules and Start a War, to cause nations to leave the region. And every time they are warned not to do it Again they Re-Offend, All Rhandon wants to do is to cause Small Regions to completely fall Apart.
I was planning to take this proposal to the Security council but I Don't Quality to post proposals yet.

A mass of illegal, grammatically horrible, rubbish. I said to read the rules. Did you? No, by the looks of it. I told you to see how Condemnations are formatted. Did you? No!

And for the sake of sanity use a frigging spell checker.

Do everyone a favour; set fire to this draft and bury the ashes in a deep, deep pit.

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:

Herzgevenia wrote:The Reason we Nominate The Freeland of Rhandon Is because they Sneeky ways of trying to undermine the Region of Sardovia by Using roleplay, which is Allowed but, they use it to provoke other nations to break the no War Rule on Sardovia! For Example, On the region of Sardovia, War is temporaryly banned until we have a bigger Amount of Nations. However, Rhandon Tries to provoke nations to break the rules and Start a War, to cause nations to leave the region. And every time they are warned not to do it Again they Re-Offend, All Rhandon wants to do is to cause Small Regions to completely fall Apart.
I was planning to take this proposal to the Security council but I Don't Quality to post proposals yet.

A mass of illegal, grammatically horrible, rubbish. I said to read the rules. Did you? No, by the looks of it. I told you to see how Condemnations are formatted. Did you? No!

And for the sake of sanity use a frigging spell checker.

Do everyone a favour; set fire to this draft and bury the ashes in a deep, deep pit.

I'm Really sorry, But you don't have to be rude.

Herzgevenia wrote:

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:A mass of illegal, grammatically horrible, rubbish. I said to read the rules. Did you? No, by the looks of it. I told you to see how Condemnations are formatted. Did you? No!

And for the sake of sanity use a frigging spell checker.

Do everyone a favour; set fire to this draft and bury the ashes in a deep, deep pit.

I'm Really sorry, But you don't have to be rude.

Well if it makes the point that all you’ve managed to serve up is garbage, then yes. Maybe now you’ll listen to the advice you’ve been given regarding writing a proposal.

So you 're saying is, this Rhandon dude's pulling Active Measures, disrupting comms lines, cultivating insurgencies, supporting opposition amongst the countries, stirring up unrest by funding rival political groups, spreading false information, media manipulation, faking a serial killing by instructing an agent to specifically kill a group of people, all that kind of shebang?
I do admit, If he did that, I just wanna clap at the manipulation of that guy. However, since war is temporarily banned (Utter bull, they should've at least allowed skirmishes at the borders) he did an unlawful thing. And since I'm new, and I do not know the politics here, I'mma just sit this out.

Herzgevenia wrote:

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:A mass of illegal, grammatically horrible, rubbish. I said to read the rules. Did you? No, by the looks of it. I told you to see how Condemnations are formatted. Did you? No!

And for the sake of sanity use a frigging spell checker.

Do everyone a favour; set fire to this draft and bury the ashes in a deep, deep pit.

I'm Really sorry, But you don't have to be rude.

BBD told you in the other thread to read the rules first. But you didn’t. So they have a right to be annoyed at you because you ignored their advice

Honeydewistania wrote:

Herzgevenia wrote:I'm Really sorry, But you don't have to be rude.

BBD told you in the other thread to read the rules first. But you didn’t. So they have a right to be annoyed at you because you ignored their advice

I know I has the Right to be, But being rude Doesn't make any difference to telling me nicely, I would have taken his Opinion anyway? They just make people leave nation States, instead of reading the Rule's and trying to do better.

Herzgevenia wrote:

Honeydewistania wrote:BBD told you in the other thread to read the rules first. But you didn’t. So they have a right to be annoyed at you because you ignored their advice

I know I has the Right to be, But being rude Doesn't make any difference to telling me nicely, I would have taken his Opinion anyway? They just make people leave nation States, instead of reading the Rule's and trying to do better.

I told you to read the rules politely in the other thread. Obviously that didn’t work. And as far as the SC is concerned if you’re going to ignore advice and carry on your own sweet way, then you’d better have a thick skin. Because drafts like yours will get hammered.

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:

Herzgevenia wrote:I know I has the Right to be, But being rude Doesn't make any difference to telling me nicely, I would have taken his Opinion anyway? They just make people leave nation States, instead of reading the Rule's and trying to do better.

I told you to read the rules politely in the other thread. Obviously that didn’t work. And as far as the SC is concerned if you’re going to ignore advice and carry on your own sweet way, then you’d better have a thick skin. Because drafts like yours will get hammered.

I did, and I try to Wright As best as I can, Admittedly my spelling is Bad thought, Most newbies read the law's but don't Quite understand them, every new User is like that on Every website. They understand the laws but not fully.
Anyway I'm really sorry to Everyone for my bad posts, that's all I say.

I'm with BBD, I know im the one there trying to condem but they could Wright better.

Rhandon wrote:I'm with BBD, I know im the one there trying to condem but they could Wright better.

You spelled write the same way Herzgevenia, leading me to suspect this is a self condmn

Herzgevenia wrote:The Reason we Nominate The Freeland of Rhandon Is because they Sneeky ways of trying to undermine the Region of Sardovia by Using roleplay, which is Allowed but, they use it to provoke other nations to break the no War Rule on Sardovia! For Example, On the region of Sardovia, War is temporaryly banned until we have a bigger Amount of Nations. However, Rhandon Tries to provoke nations to break the rules and Start a War, to cause nations to leave the region. And every time they are warned not to do it Again they Re-Offend, All Rhandon wants to do is to cause Small Regions to completely fall Apart.
I was planning to take this proposal to the Security council but I Don't Quality to post proposals yet.

A regional dispute? For a condemnation? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! What an abhorrent, absymal, and atrocious trash heap of a "proposal", if you can even call it that.

For Heaven's and Seven Seas' sake, the spell-checking Grammarly extension is free on Chrome Web Store. Mine is screaming with red underlines of your misspelled sentences.

...Heaven and Seven Seas?

Honeydewistania wrote:...Heaven and Seven Seas?

My bad attempt at an exaggeration of a reaction to this "proposal".

Honeydewistania wrote:

Rhandon wrote:I'm with BBD, I know im the one there trying to condem but they could Wright better.

I agree that this Proposal is Garbage, but I agree that you get a lot of Abuse simply by making a Bad proposal, But you should definitely learn how to Write probably, maybe next time you can do better!

Honeydewistania wrote:

Rhandon wrote:I'm with BBD, I know im the one there trying to condem but they could Wright better.

You spelled write the same way Herzgevenia, leading me to suspect this is a self condmn

Even worse; a self-condem. The horror!

Does anyone not realise this is there first proposal, Everyone's first proposal is Bad and Against the rules, so I don't understand why your so Horrible to this nation, I would only be mad if he has made a million bad proposals.

We’re not mad, just disappointed.

South Winther wrote:Does anyone not realise this is there first proposal, Everyone's first proposal is Bad and Against the rules, so I don't understand why your so Horrible to this nation, I would only be mad if he has made a million bad proposals.

Except that they were explicitly and politely requested to read the rules before drafting this, and they did not.

South Winther wrote:Does anyone not realise this is there first proposal, Everyone's first proposal is Bad and Against the rules, so I don't understand why your so Horrible to this nation, I would only be mad if he has made a million bad proposals.

I haven’t written a proposal yet because I know they’re difficult. When I didn’t understand the game as much, I’d be embarasssing myself to try.

Maybe now I’ll venture into the SC.

Honeydewistania wrote:

Rhandon wrote:I'm with BBD, I know im the one there trying to condem but they could Wright better.

You spelled write the same way Herzgevenia, leading me to suspect this is a self condmn

Definite feel of something like that going on.

This was written on the day Rhandon was founded

There's a Q&A thread for things that you're confused on, as well as a ton of great examples on the forum for you to follow when making your draft. Plus, you can save your draft before submitting it to the forum in order to improve on it later. If I were you I'd try making a rough draft, and work on it for a week or two to make it more in line with the rules and then resubmit.

South Winther wrote:Does anyone not realise this is there first proposal, Everyone's first proposal is Bad and Against the rules, so I don't understand why your so Horrible to this nation, I would only be mad if he has made a million bad proposals.

Kinda strange that this guy who's nation was founded today and has the exact same grammar issues and writing style as Rhandon and Herzgevenia decided to make his first and only posts in this thread defending Herzgevenia.

And now the OP has resigned from the WA - don’t think this “attempt” will be going far any time soon.