[PASSED] Condemn Ever-Wandering Souls

[The Stalker]

Support.

[Refuge Isle]

Support.

This would probably be a badge of honor among them but will vote for it anyways.

Thank you two for your support

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

I’m a bit late to this one, but I like the depth of research and the way the proposal has been put together. And the swipes at TEK are most amusing.

Overall a nice job RI, Souls would be a deserving recipient of a Condemnation.

[North American Imperial State]

Support.

This would probably be a badge of honor among them but will vote for it anyways.

Thank you two for your support

Will fully support this

[Tinhampton]

Reluctant support - Souls deserves a Commendation, not whatever that other thing is

[Chingis]

Very well written. I'll be voting for and hoping it passes.

[Fauxia]

Remind me how something can be a shambles?

[Refuge Isle]

Thank you guys for your support, especially BBD

Remind me how something can be a shambles?

I assume your question is one about grammar.

[Fauxia]

Thank you guys for your support, especially BBD

Remind me how something can be a shambles?

I assume your question is one about grammar.

Bizarre, I’ve never heard it that way ever.

Fair enough.

[Marxist Germany]

OOC: This gets my support; Souls is one of the most notorious raiders and they deserve the (negative) recognition from the Security Council.

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

OOC: This gets my support; Souls is one of the most notorious raiders and they deserve the (negative) recognition from the Security Council.

Negative? I think you misunderstand the use of Condemnations. They are, in my opinion, a reward for having played the villain well and for a considerable period of time. It’s a badge I’m sure Souls will wear with pride, provided this body sees fit to pass this proposal.

[Noahs Second Country]

OOC: This gets my support; Souls is one of the most notorious raiders and they deserve the (negative) recognition from the Security Council.

Negative? I think you misunderstand the use of Condemnations. They are, in my opinion, a reward for having played the villain well and for a considerable period of time. It’s a badge I’m sure Souls will wear with pride, provided this body sees fit to pass this proposal.

Especially considering that the author of the proposal is a fellow raider.

[Cornlind]

OOC: I would like it to pass considering both of us are members of the BEST RAIDING ORGANISATION ON THE SITE.

[Marxist Germany]

OOC: This gets my support; Souls is one of the most notorious raiders and they deserve the (negative) recognition from the Security Council.

Negative? I think you misunderstand the use of Condemnations. They are, in my opinion, a reward for having played the villain well and for a considerable period of time. It’s a badge I’m sure Souls will wear with pride, provided this body sees fit to pass this proposal.

OOC: Negative in the pseudo-RP-GP sense.

[Vamperiall]

Negative? I think you misunderstand the use of Condemnations. They are, in my opinion, a reward for having played the villain well and for a considerable period of time. It’s a badge I’m sure Souls will wear with pride, provided this body sees fit to pass this proposal.

Especially considering that the author of the proposal is a fellow raider.

This is true. Though, provided condemnations are badges of honour for raiders, is it not a greater compliment from a fellow raider, a comrade in the field? I'm no expert on Souls, nor what he wants, but would it not be more desirable for him to receive this condemnation? He has done everything that the document states, and this is recognition of such.

[Slashme]

Let it be noted that the Slashme voted against this motion purely because it was so poorly written.

[LollerLand]

Let it be noted that the Slashme voted against this motion purely because it was so poorly written.

Its a well written proposal for a deserving nominee, what are you talking about?

[Picairn]

Let it be noted that the Slashme voted against this motion purely because it was so poorly written.

"Sir, if this resolution is poorly written to you, then what is exactly well-written by your standards? A hundred-page omnibus budget reconciliation bill?"

[Honeydewistania]

It’s not well written as a condemnation. It’s too impressed at Souls rather than dismayed, with stuff like monumental work, advanced technological aid, that sort of thing. It gives too much of an awed tone rather than an actually shocked tone.

[Picairn]

It’s not well written as a condemnation. It’s too impressed at Souls rather than dismayed, with stuff like monumental work, advanced technological aid, that sort of thing. It gives too much of an awed tone rather than an actually shocked tone.

F, you might be right. This could use some more spice.

But I'm still voting For.

[EA Corporation]

Let it be noted that the Slashme voted against this motion purely because it was so poorly written.

"Sir, if this resolution is poorly written to you, then what is exactly well-written by your standards? A hundred-page omnibus budget reconciliation bill?"

This is clearly not up to EA's great standards. Of course, nothing can match our information pamphlets on loot boxes.

[EA Corporations]

"Sir, if this resolution is poorly written to you, then what is exactly well-written by your standards? A hundred-page omnibus budget reconciliation bill?"

This is clearly not up to EA's great standards. Of course, nothing can match our information pamphlets on loot boxes.

Lootboxes? Get with the times buddy, we have child casinos and child slave labour over here.

[Ever-Wandering Souls]

I'm honored; thanks Luca

[RiderSyl]

Congrats EWS

[Lord Dominator]

Condemn Ever-Wandering Souls was passed 8,800 votes to 5,475.