Bormiar wrote:Goobergunchia wrote:Amusingly, the first time I ever heard the phrase "Meritocracy" in connection with NationStates was with respect to The New Meritocracy, which featured a Senate that voted democratically on most everything of consequence. Where the "merit" came in was in deciding whether or not to admit regional applicants. While there were always some nations that were primarily (if not solely) identified with The New Meritocracy, in its heyday the region featured a Who's Who of prominent nations from throughout NationStates. It's interesting to see how the term has drifted from its traditional association with that region.
I was actually considering finding out what the New Meritocracy's government was for this, but I decided that that would be rather unfair considering it hasn't been active for all these years.
So, TNM was democratic for its high offices, however, in order to even enter the Senate, we had a vote for admission. All Senators voted on each applicant after a thorough, thorough grilling... and it was very intense, sometimes people were literally berated for their views (remember, most of the people back in the early years were in their teens), so I suspect this is probably where the "meritocratic" part arises the most. But indeed, I would not call a functioning NS Democracy a "meritocracy", because the fact that they have merit is incidental, it's the vote by citizens that determines the winner. In an NS meritocracy, it is a hand-picked selection by the previous office holder or leader(s) of the region. I mean, it's literally an autocracy that papers over the distinction.
I was a Senator in The New Meritocracy in 2003 - 2005-ish.