NationStates

Loconianiccurelliver wrote:

Kyundao wrote:
Considering the CCD are still vehemently salty over the fair and transparent SecGen election, this resolution from Loconianiccurelliver is nothing more than tit for tat, which is illegal if I recall correctly.

I sense fear in you young Padawan. Fun fact a proposal isn't illegal just because you think someones opinions are salty.

I find it hilarious that an elitist sympathizer has the audacity to claim I'm sensing fear even though I'm not. What you're sensing is me being offended by your open abuse of your status as a member of the World Assembly.

Kyundao wrote:I find it hilarious that an elitist sympathizer has the audacity to claim I'm sensing fear even though I'm not. What you're sensing is me being offended by your open abuse of your status as a member of the World Assembly.

Who are you calling elitist sympathizer?

How has this gone on so long?

Galactic Powers wrote:How has this gone on so long?

It's as I said earlier: this thread has just turned into a tower from which the OP can take potshots at their detractors.

Loconianiccurelliver wrote:

Kyundao wrote:I find it hilarious that an elitist sympathizer has the audacity to claim I'm sensing fear even though I'm not. What you're sensing is me being offended by your open abuse of your status as a member of the World Assembly.

Who are you calling elitist sympathizer?

As someone who comes off as genuinely unintelligent, you should take a wild guess.

It's always the dumb folks who claim to see conspiracy theories everywhere.

Xeknos wrote:It's always the dumb folks who claim to see conspiracy theories everywhere.

It can't be a conspiracy theory if it is true.

Guess what else is true? Your entry for worst SC proposal ever will be disappearing at major. No getting to vote, no passing “Go”, no collecting £200.

Loconianiccurelliver wrote:

Xeknos wrote:It's always the dumb folks who claim to see conspiracy theories everywhere.

It can't be a conspiracy theory if it is true.

The vote rigging never happened, but I guess since Joc lost the CCD just loves to think that happened to their founder.

Loconianiccurelliver wrote:Also this

Ransium wrote:
Tit-for-tat refers specifically to a commendation/condemnation that is solely due to another nation’s commendation/condemnation and provides no other valid arguments. It is not a relevant rule here. See here: viewtopic.php?p=3755848#tit_for_tat

Proposals have to be legal, i.e. not break any rules, for them to even become considerable. That's not praise for any proposal, it's literally the baseline minimum a proposal needs to reach. Your proposal being legal does nothing to set it apart from the rest of the proposals that have ever made it to the voting floor.

Then it becomes a matter of the voter base, the WA folk and the delegates, to actually consider whether they think the proposal is worth voting "yes" on.

If you haven't realised, it appears to be an overwhelming "no". And it's not because there's some WA elite conspiracy, it's that the proposal is objectively full of shit.

"Ambassador, this may be the single most absurd Security Council Proposal ever. I advise you to discontinue your pursuit of such a frivolous condemnation before your final remaining shard of dignity is lost. Good day, sir."

Before any of you get on my ass about my prop. not making vote, I think the real point that was made here is the 9 pages of forum posts that this proposal garnered.

Loconianiccurelliver wrote:Before any of you get on my ass about my prop. not making vote, I think the real point that was made here is the 9 pages of forum posts that this proposal garnered.

It was mostly 9 pages of you taking potshots at your detractors, so there was no point at all.

Loconianiccurelliver wrote:Before any of you get on my ass about my prop. not making vote, I think the real point that was made here is the 9 pages of forum posts that this proposal garnered.

So you've just nigh-admitted that this entire proposal was just an attention-grabbing joke?

Lol, okay.

South Reinkalistan wrote:

Loconianiccurelliver wrote:Before any of you get on my ass about my prop. not making vote, I think the real point that was made here is the 9 pages of forum posts that this proposal garnered.

So you've just nigh-admitted that this entire proposal was just an attention-grabbing joke?

Lol, okay.

Tbh I think he is just trying to grasp at straws for some tiny semblance of a "victory" from this, regardless of how meagre and nebulous that supposed "victory" is...

The New California Republic wrote:

South Reinkalistan wrote:So you've just nigh-admitted that this entire proposal was just an attention-grabbing joke?

Lol, okay.

The I think he is just trying to grasp at straws for some tiny semblance of a "victory" from this, regardless of how meagre and nebulous that supposed "victory" is...

As someone who embarrassingly recently tried the same sort of thing, I can confirm that's likely OP's thought process.

Pathetic

I'm a bit late, but this is just plain depressing. Have you considered that this proposal and it's conspiracy theory backing, on top of the CCD's ideology, are main reasons why the CCD and Jocospor are so infamous? And this "Resolution" Isn't going to help.

So, essentially, what I'm getting from reading these multiple condemnations, is that you lot are the odd conspiracy cultists of NS?
Considering how well I know Kuriko, not only is this proposal a sham on that front, but it is also a sham for the Security Council on grander proportions than this proposed conspiracy could ever have been.

[quote="Loconianiccurelliver";p="36926943"]I just think it is appalling that people would rather elect some lesbian catgirl nation as SecGen than Jocospor who actually wanted to do things.
NationStates and the WA are not just platforms for peoples bad memes.[/quote]
Just because someone has a platform doesn't mean everyone agrees with it.

People on this thread complained about my proposal writing skills meanwhile in the SC a just as badly written proposal is at vote.

Loconianiccurelliver wrote:People on this thread complained about my proposal writing skills meanwhile in the SC a just as badly written proposal is at vote.

And people are voting it down accordingly, currently 95% against.

Loconianiccurelliver wrote:People on this thread complained about my proposal writing skills meanwhile in the SC a just as badly written proposal is at vote.

And it is getting annihilated in the vote. I can see you were trying to make some kind of a point here, but it just fails as hard as the current proposal at vote in the SC is going to fail.

Looking back on this thread I just wanted to write a bit of an apology to everyone involved and NS as a whole. You see I did all of this just because I was bored one day and decided to be an asshole to some folks for fun. I don't really associate with the whole conspiracy thing or any of that, I just wanted to get on someone or somethings nerves that day. I sort of realize now though that I ruined what little reputation I had on this site with this and wanted to try and make up/explain. Now my NS political views are just that Max Barry needs to add regions as a trading card type (make it happen). I hope that A. some of you will see this and kind of forgive me, and B. that you all realize that I didn't mean to disturb the SC forum by posting this its just an artifact of the way forums work.

Apology accepted. Please act friendlier next time, and every time