NATION

PASSWORD

[Proposed] Repeal "Condemn This Game"

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Unshleepd
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: Mar 14, 2018
Capitalizt

[Proposed] Repeal "Condemn This Game"

Postby Unshleepd » Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:35 am

Repeal SCR299
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Security Council Resolution #299 “Condemn This Game”shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The Security Council,

Postulating that there is no place within the Security Council for frivolous behaviors,

Understanding that the Security Council cannot be considered a satirical organization on any other day than April 1st, so SCR#299 is not relevant or acceptable now or when it passed,

Disgusted that a resolution could condemn any nation or region for the sake of the joke,

Bearing in mind that countries have the right to decide which region they voluntarily belong to,

Emphasizing the resolution shall require that important proof should be provided to show that the target requires condemnation. The resolution did not mentioned a single proof behind it’s claims. Prior to condemnation This Game was not involved in actions mentioned in resolution, and it never raided, nor imposed its will on other nations nor regions,

Further emphasizing that This Game was a region with nearly no activity before the condemnation proposal. It all changed after Lord Dominator, the author of the resolution, coordinated international action to create false activities in the region,

Finding that this game has no actual ability to harm any regional community,

Pointing that This Game was only picked as target because of it name,

Believing a condemnation for mentioned causes is inadmissible,

Hereby repeals Condemn This Game.
Last edited by Unshleepd on Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:10 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 27796
Founded: Dec 16, 2003
Capitalizt

Postby Frisbeeteria » Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:39 am

Unshleepd wrote:Postulating that there is no place within the Security Council for frivolous behaviors,

Really? I'm pretty sure that most of what gets passed is frivolous.

User avatar
South Reinkalistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1785
Founded: Mar 12, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby South Reinkalistan » Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:41 am

Unshleepd wrote:Bearing in mind that countries have the right to decide which region they voluntarily belong to,

Unshleepd wrote:Pointing that This Game was only picked as target because of it name,

Now I'm honestly really inexperienced in the SC so I'm not sure, but you could probably go for better verbs here.
Last edited by South Reinkalistan on Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
THE PEOPLE ETERNAL
" We will not bow to your dictation. We are free. We bled to be free.
Who are you to tell us what we may and may not do? We stopped being your slaves an era ago. "
South Reinkalistan is a massive, ecologically-diverse nation notable for its roving student militias and widespread hatred for the elderly.
In the midst of a room-temperature cultural revolution that's lost its momentum, the Party carefully plans its next move.
As the brittle bones of fragile empires begin to crack beneath their own weight, history's symphony reaches crescendo pitch. The future is all but certain.

User avatar
Bormiar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1562
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bormiar » Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:49 am

Frisbeeteria wrote:
Unshleepd wrote:Postulating that there is no place within the Security Council for frivolous behaviors,

Really? I'm pretty sure that most of what gets passed is frivolous.

I’d say that there’s value in the text of most C&Cs, or just those which are informative.

User avatar
Boda
Diplomat
 
Posts: 540
Founded: Nov 14, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Boda » Sun Apr 05, 2020 11:04 am

So, is nobody going to mention Haiku’s commendation?
The Order of the Grey Wardens
In War, Victory. In Peace, Vigilance. In Death, Sacrifice.

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Sun Apr 05, 2020 11:56 am

Badly written, lacks the sense of humour really required for this repeal. Spelling mistakes and poor grammar throughout.

Really should try harder.
Last edited by Bhang Bhang Duc on Sun Apr 05, 2020 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Lord Dominator
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8900
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Right-wing Utopia

Postby Lord Dominator » Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:01 pm

One, you spelled false arong.

Two, as written the Condemn asserts that nations who do those activities are in the region (and the region is somehow to blame for the negative turn), not that the region participates in them.

User avatar
The Gilded Star
Envoy
 
Posts: 315
Founded: Nov 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Gilded Star » Sun Apr 05, 2020 2:06 pm

Lord Dominator wrote:One, you spelled false arong.


I appreciate the irony of spelling wrong wrong here. :p

I'd like to wrap this post up with something actually constructive, but I'm not sure if continued work on this proposal will be fruitful, due to another repeal gaining much more support.

User avatar
Morover
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1557
Founded: Oct 14, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Morover » Tue Apr 07, 2020 2:36 pm

Feedback in red, though this looks like it'll get to vote so I may be too late.
Unshleepd wrote:
Repeal SCR299
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Security Council Resolution #299 “Condemn This Game”shall be struck out and rendered null and void. In the actual text of the proposal, this appears twice. You don't need to add it, as the game auto-adds it.

The Security Council,

Postulating that there is no place within the Security Council for frivolous behaviors,

Understanding that the Security Council cannot be considered a satirical organization on any other day than April 1st, so SCR#299 is not relevant or acceptable now or when it passed, I don't know how the proposal isn't "relevant" now. I'd argue that it grows more relevant every day, regardless of if you agree with the satire or not.

Disgusted that a resolution could condemn any nation or region for the sake of the joke, Why? There are several resolutions I have for you to repeal if this is your legitimate belief.

Bearing in mind that countries have the right to decide which region they voluntarily belong to, How is this relevant? Also, as mentioned prior, the operative word could use some work.

Emphasizing the resolution shall require that important proof should be provided to show that the target requires condemnation. The resolution did not mentioned a single proof behind it’s claims. Prior to condemnation This Game was not involved in actions mentioned in resolution, and it never raided, nor imposed its will on other nations nor regions, That's, uh, kinda the point of satire.

Further emphasizing that This Game was a region with nearly no activity before the condemnation proposal. It all changed after Lord Dominator, the author of the resolution, coordinated international action to create false activities in the region, Again, it's the point of satire. I feel that in a repeal of this resolution, you can either take into account the satire and focus on that, or you can focus on the actual content of the resolution. Focusing on satire kinda negates all the points you make about the content of the resolution.

Finding that this game has no actual ability to harm any regional community, That's not always why condemnations are in place, though.

Pointing that This Game was only picked as target because of it name,

Believing a condemnation for mentioned causes is inadmissible,

Hereby repeals Condemn This Game.

I know I'm guilty of some of the stuff I pointed out in here, myself (especially in regards to the satire parts). The big difference is that mine is a satire in itself. I was going to refrain from comment as this didn't look like it was going to get to vote, but now that it is, I feel some sense of obligation to point out my problems with it.
World Assembly Author
ns.morover@gmail.com


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads