NATION

PASSWORD

[Draft] Repeal "Condemn This Game"

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Gorundu
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 167
Founded: May 02, 2019
Left-wing Utopia

[Draft] Repeal "Condemn This Game"

Postby Gorundu » Sun Apr 05, 2020 8:57 am

Because we need another one of these, and also why not make the repeal more low effort than the original?
Recognising this is an April Fools joke,

Realising it is no longer April Fools,

Hereby repeals "Condemn This Game".

Tell me if this is legal pls
Last edited by Gorundu on Sun Apr 05, 2020 8:58 am, edited 2 times in total.
Minister of World Assembly Affairs of The North Pacific
Posts do not represent my region's views unless stated otherwise.

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Minister
 
Posts: 2191
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
New York Times Democracy

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:15 am

I think the mention of April Fools would be a R4(a) violation - real world reference.
Former Delegate and Guardian of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart

Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

User avatar
Lord Dominator
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5891
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Lord Dominator » Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:24 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:I think the mention of April Fools would be a R4(a) violation - real world reference.

I would rather disagree with this, on the basis that it's a holiday that could be reasonably assumed to be celebrated by at least one NS nation. The actual wording of the sentence may need fixes in that regard.

If it isn't legal, I would suggest just listing it as April 1st, seeing as date references are legal.
Dee Vytherov-Skollvaldr | Forest | TBH Major and Council Member | WA Vizier | Ambassador to the WA

User avatar
Sedgistan
Issues Moderator
 
Posts: 28022
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:26 am

I'd be inclined to consider April Fools acceptable within Rule 4; it's an aspect of the NationStates world. That's not to say that any mention of it, or details of NS's various April Fools events are necessarily Rule 4 compliant - but "April Fools" alone shouldn't be automatically a violation.

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Minister
 
Posts: 2191
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
New York Times Democracy

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:48 am

Sedgistan wrote:I'd be inclined to consider April Fools acceptable within Rule 4; it's an aspect of the NationStates world. That's not to say that any mention of it, or details of NS's various April Fools events are necessarily Rule 4 compliant - but "April Fools" alone shouldn't be automatically a violation.

Thanks for the clarification Sedge.
Former Delegate and Guardian of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart

Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.


Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot]

Advertisement

Remove ads