NATION

PASSWORD

Liberate Capatalitidice - Draft of Security Council Proposal

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
The Free States of Paratethys
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Jan 17, 2020
Ex-Nation

Liberate Capatalitidice - Draft of Security Council Proposal

Postby The Free States of Paratethys » Thu Mar 05, 2020 9:25 pm

Security Council Proposal
ID: TBD Upon Submission

Liberate Capatalitidice
A resolution to strike down Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region.

Category: Liberation

Nominee: Capatalitidice

Proposed by: The Free States of Paratethys

Recognizing that this proposal complies with Security Council proposal standards, by:

- Not condemning or commending members of the site staff, but rather seeking fair and democratic legislative action concerning the inclusion, sovereignty, and WA membership of Catilizt, the regional founder of Capatalitidice and a compliant member of the World, and formerly the WA.

- Providing a unique and relevant argument that abides by Security Council proposal standards by bringing forth an issue concerning the sovereignty of a nation within the WA and the World, therefore affecting the condition of other nations, remaining relevant as a Security Council Proposal, and deserving of WA deliberation.

- Stating an operative clause: seeking a WA consensus on the liberty & inclusion of Catilizt in the WA, after Catilizt was banned from the WA following unfounded and unprovable, although administratively-relevent, assertions that Catilizt was illegally administering a second nation that was also a WA member. This will be further detailed following this justifying explanatory preface.

- Reading as representing the opinion of the WA, and targeting a nation and an international organization which affects the region of Capatalitidice and the World.

Acknowledging that The Free States of Paratethys, although retaining socio-politico-economic, diplomatic, and ideological relations with Catilizt, holds no biased predispositions, with the best intentions for the WA and the World in mind, with confidence in it’s legitimacy, and with willingness to accept full responsibility and administrative punitive action should WA and World superiors deem this proposal illegal and offensive, and seek to punish any WA Delegates who vote in favor of this proposal.

Recognizing that, although administratively-relevant, the banning of Catilizt from the WA was unfounded and based on unprovable allegations of the illegal administration of another WA-member nation by Catilizt, and since this action affects a nation, it also affects this nation’s regional allies, regional diplomatic ties and embassies, the WA, and the World, considering that this decision is one that sets a precedent for how other issues of alike nature shall be addressed. Therefore, it is worthy of review and democratic consensus by the WA.

Supporting Catilizt’s claims to innocence, which are steadfast, resolute, and evidently true and wholehearted.

Realizing that due to The Free States of Paratethys’ close ties with Catilizt, being the first nation to join the region of Capatalitidice after Catilizt’s founding of the region, Paratethys is a credible advocate for Catilizt’s reinstatement in the WA, as Paratethys has the most knowledge of Catilizt’s operations within the World, due to regular conference between the two nations. Although this may also raise suspicion of biased Paratethysian motives in this proposal, it also supports the motion, as it is decisive in Paratethys’ own international standing in the World and the WA.

Reaffirming the integrity of both Catilizt and Paratethys concerning the matter, and also, as stated, Paratethys’ acceptance of full responsibility and administrative punitive action should WA and World superiors deem this proposal illegal.

Emphasizing that this proposal only pertains to the reinstatement of Catilizt in the WA, and not the second nation which Catilizt was accused of administering. This is not out of admittance of guilt, but because of Catilizt’s and Paratethys’ unfamiliarity with this accessory nation.

Appealing to the administrators of the WA and the World to take into serious consideration the contents of this proposal, and also consider the votes of those regional WA delegates who vote on this matter. That being said, it is also humbly implored that any WA delegates who intend on voting on this proposal make their decision after careful review and analysis of this document, and base their vote out of genuine credence.

Advocating for a repeal of the administrative resolution to ban Catilizt from the WA, and the restoration of Catilizt as a member nation of the WA.

The Security Council, by the deliberation and consensus of the Delegates of the Nation-States of this World Assembly, does hereby support the reinstatement of Catilizt to the WA upon collective approval of this document, and Liberate Capatalitidice.
Last edited by The Free States of Paratethys on Thu Mar 05, 2020 10:40 pm, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13712
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Thu Mar 05, 2020 9:30 pm

You cannot Liberate a nation. Please tag your joke proposals accordingly.
Last edited by Tinhampton on Thu Mar 05, 2020 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; *author of the most popular SC Res. ever; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; 48yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate ~ currently reading The World by Simon Sebag Montefiore

User avatar
The Free States of Paratethys
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Jan 17, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free States of Paratethys » Thu Mar 05, 2020 9:36 pm

Tinhampton wrote:You cannot Liberate a nation. Please tag your joke proposals accordingly.


That’s why it’s called a draft, thank you for the input. And I can assure you, the proposal isn’t a joke.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13712
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Thu Mar 05, 2020 9:58 pm

"there is [no] point maintaining a resolution whose entire substance has all the legislative effect of a small child whining "waaah, Mummy! I don't like it! waaah!""


Are you absolutely sure that this is not just a brazen-faced attempt at appealing your mate's one-year ban from the WA? Rules 2 and 4 are subdivided into four sub-rules, so to speak, and - if what I've just stated is your main aim - your proposal is UNSALVAGEABLY ILLEGAL for breaking Rules 2c (seeking to take up a Moderation matter, viz. your mate's WA ban, with the SC) and 4d (how can "The Free States of Paratethys... puts forth this proposal" be treated as anything other than the perspective of Not The World Assembly?).

Speaking as a survivor of Liberate United Defenders League and Commend Northern Redlands, this is the single worst badge hunt I have ever seen!
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; *author of the most popular SC Res. ever; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; 48yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate ~ currently reading The World by Simon Sebag Montefiore

User avatar
The Free States of Paratethys
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Jan 17, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free States of Paratethys » Thu Mar 05, 2020 10:10 pm

Tinhampton wrote:
"there is [no] point maintaining a resolution whose entire substance has all the legislative effect of a small child whining "waaah, Mummy! I don't like it! waaah!""


Are you absolutely sure that this is not just a brazen-faced attempt at appealing your mate's one-year ban from the WA? Rules 2 and 4 are subdivided into four sub-rules, so to speak, and - if what I've just stated is your main aim - your proposal is UNSALVAGEABLY ILLEGAL for breaking Rules 2c (seeking to take up a Moderation matter, viz. your mate's WA ban, with the SC) and 4d (how can "The Free States of Paratethys... puts forth this proposal" be treated as anything other than the perspective of Not The World Assembly?).

Speaking as a survivor of Liberate United Defenders League and Commend Northern Redlands, this is the single worst badge hunt I have ever seen!


Luckily, I can edit the draft, because, evidently, it’s a draft. Addressing the apparent breakage of 2C, perhaps this is a moderation matter, but the whole point of the entirety of the preface is recognizing the fact that it is also a WA matter and therefore addressing it as such, due to the effect that the action has on WA member nations and Capatalitidice as a whole. As for 4D, since this is a draft, I can simply edit the context. If you take the time to review my activity in the forums, you’ll notice that this is my first forum post, and first proposal draft. So, undeniably, there will be faults. I’ll take your condescending insults with a grain of salt, and happily accept the constructive criticism to further proof my document. Thank you.

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4732
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Fri Mar 06, 2020 12:46 am

In addition to the illegalities Tinhampton pointed out I see an R3 and an R4(c) violation. Copying bits and pieces verbatim from the ruleset might also be classed as plagiarism.

So kindly stop the badge hunt and take your whinge elsewhere.

P.S. Nobody likes or will support a cheat.
Last edited by Bhang Bhang Duc on Fri Mar 06, 2020 1:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 27799
Founded: Dec 16, 2003
Capitalizt

Postby Frisbeeteria » Fri Mar 06, 2020 9:00 am

The Free States of Paratethys wrote:the whole point of the entirety of the preface is recognizing the fact that it is also a WA matter and therefore addressing it as such, due to the effect that the action has on WA member nations and Capatalitidice as a whole.

WA ejections are entirely a moderation matter. Your argument is incorrect and illegal. Site rules are not democratic. As the FAQ clearly states,
FAQ wrote:It's free speech, so I can post whatever I like here, right?

Ahahahaha! Hahaha! Free speech! No, it's not. I run this web site, see, so you have to play by my rules. It's like my own Father Knows Best state.

You cannot address moderation matters via popular vote. We don't allow that.

Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator

User avatar
BlackLight Covenant
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 138
Founded: Apr 24, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby BlackLight Covenant » Fri Mar 06, 2020 9:08 am

OOC: And with Fris' post, I'm fairly certain all that needed to be said has been said about this matter. Considering how your entire proposal seems to have been built around attempting to judge based on moderator action, I strongly doubt that this whole ordeal can even remotely be salvaged. Unless, of course, you can find good reasons for a liberation.
Last edited by BlackLight Covenant on Fri Mar 06, 2020 9:09 am, edited 2 times in total.

Blacklight is an isolationist, and notably xenophobic, interstellar corporatocracy.
Its government and society are made up of three massive conglomerates.
They maintain joint control over affairs normal governments would otherwise be concerned with.

Ellen Lovik
- Secondary Multiversal Ambassador
- 2nd Corporate Representative to the World Assembly, currently replacing Dietrich Latvala
- Mentally mildly stuck in the mindset of her time as riot control officer



Currently the most general officer of generic things, common issues, and standard matters for The Glorious Nations of Iwaku, and Observer of Intergalactic Law as The Armada of Refuge for Eientei Gensokyo!


User avatar
Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 27799
Founded: Dec 16, 2003
Capitalizt

Postby Frisbeeteria » Fri Mar 06, 2020 9:20 am

BlackLight Covenant wrote:Unless, of course, you can find good reasons for a liberation.

Given that it's not possible to liberate a nation, there is no possible way for them to find "good reasons".

BlackLight Covenant wrote: with Fris' post, I'm fairly certain all that needed to be said has been said about this matter.

So why did you say additional things about this matter?

Thread locked.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: General TM

Advertisement

Remove ads