[REMOVED] Condemn the Federation of Conservative Nations

[New Jakobly]

REMOVED

[Bormiar]

Absolutely not. We don't condemn regions for OOC problems- that's an undisputed fact.

Better luck next time :/

[New Jakobly]

Absolutely not. We don't condemn regions for OOC problems- that's an undisputed fact.

Better luck next time :/

TBH was condemned twice on OOC points.

[Polish Prussian Commonwealth]

FCN Expat speaking.


Thank you for the free recruitment drive!

[Bormiar]

Absolutely not. We don't condemn regions for OOC problems- that's an undisputed fact.

Better luck next time :/

TBH was condemned twice on OOC points.

Raiding isn't an OOC problem.

[New Jakobly]

TBH was condemned twice on OOC points.

Raiding isn't an OOC problem.

SC rules do not state that OOC offenses are prohibited.

[Bormiar]

Raiding isn't an OOC problem.

SC rules do not state that OOC offenses are prohibited.

SC rules also don't state that proposals have to be well-written or even accurate (and you seem to be taking the liberty they gave you), but people will still vote against.

[Gagium]

In full support

[Gagium]

Raiding isn't an OOC problem.

SC rules do not state that OOC offenses are prohibited.

Since when did you care about any rules? You got outed by the mods for breaking plenty during your time in the FCN haha

[Polish Prussian Commonwealth]

In full support

^^^^^

Thank you for giving us a shiny new badge

[Rost Dreadnorramus]

The Raxulan Empire will side with the FCN.

[Rost Dreadnorramus]

In full support

^^^^^

Thank you for giving us a shiny new badge

I'd like to get me one of those, but I've not done enough to earn one (yet).

[Aglonia]

-snip-

I believe the Raiding parts in abuses to power would fall under harassment of nations and region.

I feel it may be better if you just put a point about recognizing their activities as raiders and state a few regions they have overthrown.

[Tinhampton]

Abuses of Power, seeing the following: Raiding regions on their own for the sake of increasing status. This has included overthrowing the Union of Conservative States for no forseeable reason other than the already stated one...

REALIZING that a previous attempt to liberate the FCN had crucial evidence to do so yet failed due to corruption in the FCN's government, blockading the advancement of the resolution.

Liberate FCN got discarded because it was submitted using a WA multi who happened to be none other than the UCS' former Delegate, and it only won about a quarter of the vote in the first place. If anything, we should blame corruption in the UCS government for the drastic failure of that Liberation. Such revenge motives also come into play here and will also see it defeated; although I trust that this is your only WA account, the circumstances in which you lost Jakobly will play just as heavily into the minds of the voters as did the circumstances into which Sonoraland/Crimsonfield submitted her Liberation.

My Liberate The Coalition of Fascist Nations only won about a quarter of the vote, could I please condemn them for impeding the passage of my failed resolution "due to corruption in the CoFN's government?" If you do not reword your REALIZING clause significantly to take into account this correlation, then you have NO SUPPORT from me.

I plan to use the shoddy nature of your REALIZING clause as the basis for an InstaRepeal! if this somehow passes, although it has not yet been written. As a general rule, if I can write an InstaRepeal of your proposal, I ain't supporting it.

---

The Empire will side with the FCN.

We are, for once, agreed!

[New Jakobly]

-snip-

I believe the Raiding parts in abuses to power would fall under harassment of nations and region.

I feel it may be better if you just put a point about recognizing their activities as raiders and state a few regions they have overthrown.

Ok. I will make these edits in a few moments.

[Gagium]

I believe the Raiding parts in abuses to power would fall under harassment of nations and region.

I feel it may be better if you just put a point about recognizing their activities as raiders and state a few regions they have overthrown.

Ok. I will make these edits in a few moments.

You should also edit your OP to include your colorful history in the FCN lmao, your personal vendetta against us since you were banned for multiple violations of NS rules and overall childish behavior isn't the SC's problem pal bwhahaha

EDIT: Bonus points if you include your puppet spam after banned

[Kavagrad]

This is a waste of time, includes falsehoods and irrelevant clauses that have no place in an SC proposal, and is clearly the result of a personal grudge.

Besides, I will not be supporting a proposal written by someone that tried to infiltrate my home region while a member of the region that they are now trying to condemn.

Opposed.

[New Jakobly]

Seeing all of the negative reviews towards the bill, I will remove it, realizing it is a personal grudge.

I apologize to the FCN and everyone else who reviewed this as I now realize this is completely inappropriate and immature.

[Bormiar]

Seeing all of the negative reviews towards the bill, I will remove it, realizing it is a personal grudge.

I apologize to the FCN and everyone else who reviewed this as I now realize this is completely inappropriate and immature.

FCN would probably be proud of all the attention. You don't need to apologize to anyone.

Wise choice, all in all.

[New Waldensia]

Seeing all of the negative reviews towards the bill, I will remove it, realizing it is a personal grudge.

I apologize to the FCN and everyone else who reviewed this as I now realize this is completely inappropriate and immature.

RIP.