Kuriko wrote:She was vilified by members of the Raider community, but much worse than by what you're claiming we've done on TB.
It depends on what you define as "the Raider community," because I don't recall her vilification by respectable raiders being "much worse" than being called "a piece of shit" as Twobagger was. Souls, for example, never called her anything like that. Gest did call her something pretty vile, and for that and many other reasons he was shunned by other raiders, pretty much universally. So I think you really have no ground to stand on here with this comparison.
Kuriko wrote:I'm not saying they should be swept under the rug or forgotten, what I'm saying is that OOC reactions to feeling betrayed and hurt and lied too shouldn't be remarked upon in an IC proposal or resolution. Other proposals have received far worse flak for the very same thing, but somehow since its XKI related OOC reactions should be remarked on in an IC resolution?
How are these "OOC reactions" that are out of bounds for criticism? So is that how this works, if someone switches sides you folks and you alone get to claim you're just OOCly venting and not have anyone publicly criticize your comments, but with everyone else it's fair game? Twobagger's alignment switch was an IC situation, and the comments made in regard to it were similarly IC. You don't get to call them OOC and out of bounds just because you don't want to see your region criticized. The fact is he was vilified, the clause is accurate, and there's no reason it shouldn't be included. Get over it.