Nrevyw wrote:Murden wrote:The region was left in a bereft state and all but abandoned. Why should we care about its vaunted history and community when no one native stepped up to the plate to actually do anything to preserve it? I think the support for liberation is an example of animosity towards raiders/conquerors which is unfairly misplaced. The new owners hardly invaded a bustling region, but an empty one. They're utilizing an asset that would otherwise continue to gather moss. I do not support this proposal.
Why does that give them right to take it over? This argument is so flawed on so many levels it's hard to argue against it.
If it's incredibly flawed, it should be easy to refute then