NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Liberate Lardyland

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Advertisement

Remove ads

Post a reply
User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4172
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Fri Oct 11, 2019 3:10 am

Honeydewistania wrote:Edit: And it’s submitted despite general negative feedback.

And still with the references to spam etc., so possibly an R2 violation as I mentioned earlier in this thread.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
Top
User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6789
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:20 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:So it seems you wish to punish the target region for spam. However, spam is against NS rules and should be dealt with by Moderation. Therefore your proposal might well be falling foul of Rule 2(c).

If you wish to pursue this uninspiring badge hunt then it might be best to lose all references to spam.


This is one piece of feedback you shouldn’t have ignored.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.
Top
User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6789
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:05 am

Even with your changes I still read this as being largely about site rules violations. Inappropriate flags is clearly an OSRS violation, as is the puppet flooding your describing.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.
Top
User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4172
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Sat Oct 12, 2019 4:45 am

I think this has now died the death as the author resigned from the WA after pulling their latest illegal version.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
Top
User avatar
WayNeacTia
Senator
 
Posts: 4330
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WayNeacTia » Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:10 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:I think this has now died the death as the author resigned from the WA after pulling their latest illegal version.


The system works!
Sarcasm dispensed moderately.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac

wait
Top
Previous
Post a reply

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Advertisement

Remove ads