by Ballpit » Tue Oct 01, 2019 9:56 am
by Ballpit » Tue Oct 01, 2019 1:16 pm
by Marxist Germany » Tue Oct 01, 2019 3:22 pm
by Kuriko » Tue Oct 01, 2019 3:32 pm
by WayNeacTia » Tue Oct 01, 2019 4:56 pm
Kuriko wrote:The region is passworded by the founder nation, therefore the resolution would never have an effect upon it.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Ballpit » Tue Oct 01, 2019 5:28 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Kuriko wrote:The region is passworded by the founder nation, therefore the resolution would never have an effect upon it.
Didn't seem to stop liberation's of NE, CCD, and how many others? Not saying it is a good idea, just seems a tad hypocritical of you to call the author out for it.
by Praeceps » Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:57 pm
Marxist Germany wrote:the purpose of a liberation... is to help regions from raiders
by WayNeacTia » Tue Oct 01, 2019 9:03 pm
Ballpit wrote:Nonetheless, I'm not here to see who votes in what way. Unless you have feedback relative to the proposal itself of what you think could potentially need a change, please don't waste everyone's time with a "I would vote this way" comment.
Thanks in advance. o/
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Malphe II » Tue Oct 01, 2019 11:06 pm
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Tue Oct 01, 2019 11:46 pm
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by BlackLight Covenant » Wed Oct 02, 2019 12:41 am
by Kuriko » Wed Oct 02, 2019 3:57 am
Ballpit wrote:Wayneactia wrote:
Didn't seem to stop liberation's of NE, CCD, and how many others? Not saying it is a good idea, just seems a tad hypocritical of you to call the author out for it.
I would expect defenderdom to vote as such.
And it doesn't do nothing, it sets the stage, and it warns other regions that the behaviour displayed by the subject in question is unacceptable.
Nonetheless, I'm not here to see who votes in what way. Unless you have feedback relative to the proposal itself of what you think could potentially need a change, please don't waste everyone's time with a "I would vote this way" comment.
Thanks in advance. o/
Wayneactia wrote:Kuriko wrote:The region is passworded by the founder nation, therefore the resolution would never have an effect upon it.
Didn't seem to stop liberation's of NE, CCD, and how many others? Not saying it is a good idea, just seems a tad hypocritical of you to call the author out for it.
by Ballpit » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:53 am
Kuriko wrote:Ballpit wrote:
I would expect defenderdom to vote as such.
And it doesn't do nothing, it sets the stage, and it warns other regions that the behaviour displayed by the subject in question is unacceptable.
Nonetheless, I'm not here to see who votes in what way. Unless you have feedback relative to the proposal itself of what you think could potentially need a change, please don't waste everyone's time with a "I would vote this way" comment.
Thanks in advance. o/
There is no thread ownership in the SC, so you cannot tell us what we can or cannot say in this thread. If we want to say that we will vote one way or another in this thread we are allowed to do so. Also, you may not be aware of this but my having a sleeper in Spam is what led to its downfall faster than it would have nornally taken. I have no love for those in Lardyland or Meat.
Also, I'll point out that the author of this resolution was a member of the Lardyland community in 2018. Whether or not this is in retaliation for something, or because they don't like the community anymore, I can't say. Evidence: http://nsdossier.texasregion.net//histo ... tart=&end=Wayneactia wrote:
Didn't seem to stop liberation's of NE, CCD, and how many others? Not saying it is a good idea, just seems a tad hypocritical of you to call the author out for it.
NE and CCD have about a 95% chance of having their founders deleted with no warning and without them being able to password the region beforehand, whereas Lardyland is already passworded by the founder at this point. Your argument is moot when it comes to comparing the two.
by Marxist Germany » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:16 am
by Malphe » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:20 am
Ballpit wrote:Why do I get the feeling that I'm the only one taking steps to make lots of people's daydreams of burning lardyland into a reality painted in gold?
by Ballpit » Wed Oct 02, 2019 2:20 pm
Malphe wrote:Ballpit wrote:Why do I get the feeling that I'm the only one taking steps to make lots of people's daydreams of burning lardyland into a reality painted in gold?
tbqf I don't think most people really put any thought to Lardyland, even less than they did before. Don't try to bank off everyone just wanting to see Lardyland get yeeted for your proposal to pass, doesn't change that there honestly isn't that much to work with for a liberation imho beyond the embassy spamming and being buddy with some fascists.
I get that you want to raid the region, I get that NPO probably does in general and yeah fair game, offensive libs for the benefit of a specific org have been a thing before but I don't think there's enough material here to justify it.
by Kaboomlandia » Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:16 pm
by WayNeacTia » Thu Oct 03, 2019 2:28 pm
Kuriko wrote:NE and CCD have about a 95% chance of having their founders deleted with no warning and without them being able to password the region beforehand, whereas Lardyland is already passworded by the founder at this point. Your argument is moot when it comes to comparing the two.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Johanneslanden » Sat Oct 05, 2019 8:08 am
by Blood Wine » Sun Oct 06, 2019 8:17 am
Elke and Elba wrote:Well Mall, you want Haven? I'd want your Joint Systems Alliance badge, then.
Discoveria wrote:Port blood is a raider through and through. Honest.
Tim-Opolis wrote:The Salt Mines will be fueled for months by the tears of silly fascists.
[4:27 PM] Antigone: Port Blood = Gameplay JesusSedgistan wrote:Attempted threadjack on sandwiches and satanism removed.
by Honeydewistania » Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:02 am
Ballpit wrote:The Security Council,
Noting that Lardyland at this point in time is not yet founderless;
Understanding that embassies typically denote friendly relations with fellow regions and disturbed by Lardyland's insistence on disregarding that by sending out endless requests for embassies to other regions regardless of their identity or affinity to Lardyland or its adherents;
Appalled by Lardyland’s practise of stealing the symbology and identity of fellow nations and regions, and by the region's use of inappropriate or disrespectful flags as the regional icon;
Abhorred by Lardyland's choice to join an alliance with Fascist regions merely to further a collection of meaningless embassies with condemned regions and their adherents, the most notable alliance being the Virtu Alliance with Farkasfalka;
Believing that a region such as Lardyland, whose practices of constructing embassies with Nazi and Fascist regions, disturbing other regions and defiling their own with disruptive tactics such as spam and sending member nations to plague the properties of other regions has not earned the right to rest peacefully;
Further Believing that Liberating Lardyland will serve as a warning to other regions, a warning that certain standards are upheld by this Assembly, and that failure to acknowledge and comply with these standards will result in the Security Council taking action;
Acknowledging that Liberating Lardyland, which has built its reputation on spam, will leave the region open to invasion after its founder leaves;
Hereby Liberates Lardyland.
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Honeydewistania » Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:04 am
Wayneactia wrote:Kuriko wrote:NE and CCD have about a 95% chance of having their founders deleted with no warning and without them being able to password the region beforehand, whereas Lardyland is already passworded by the founder at this point. Your argument is moot when it comes to comparing the two.
Do you have a source for this or are you just floating a hope? As far as I am aware, German Dragons has never received a warning, and Joco seems to be pretty clean as well. Contrary to popular belief, the mods don't don't delete founders, just because they happen to be unpopular or controversial.
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement