[Draft] Condemn Vamperiall

[Voltar Cannis]

In the Security Council,

Noting that the the fall of Voltarium falls under the responsibility of the Vamperiall.
Shocked, the Voltarium fell because Vamperiall decided to become negligent and place the region in anarchy after he repeatedly ignored his duties as Founder.
Disgusted that the region was shut down when the number of nations was 57. A number many regions only dream of.
Confident that Vamperiall only ended the region in benefit of the nation.
Dismayed that Vamperiall terminated recruitment, even though the number of nations was still high.
Rejecting that Vamperiall’s idea of a "shut down" was the correct choice of action.

Hereby Condemns Vamperiall.

[Miss Bad Life Choices]

Plenty of founders shut down regions without explanation or solid reasonings. It sucks, but it's not condemnable by itself.

[Malphe]

Plenty of founders shut down regions without explanation or solid reasonings. It sucks, but it's not condemnable by itself.

^ yeah this. This definitely isn't sufficient for a condemnation, even if the action was unfair. Don't think that Vamp would be condemnable even if you included more information about his NS career than just this shutdown either, there just isn't enough material to work with imo.

[Ransium]

All the “he/his/himself” are rule 4b violations.

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

This must be the fourth or fifth time you’ve submitted a proposal to the SC, though only the second time you’ve actually posted a thread about it in the forums.

After that number of failed attempts you’d think you’d have bothered to at least familiarise yourself with the rules. Obviously not.

Apart from the two R4(b) violations Ransium has pointed out, your proposal is like your previous attempts; lacking in any real detail as to why the nominee stands out for Condemnation.