NATION

PASSWORD

motives for my condemnation proposal to the Black Hawks

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Blueflarst
Envoy
 
Posts: 211
Founded: Aug 25, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

motives for my condemnation proposal to the Black Hawks

Postby Blueflarst » Thu May 02, 2019 2:19 am

Yesterday i proposed a condemnation to the Black hawks
This would be the third one. They just raided another medium region Westphalia. We can not allow them to continue! They are not only rading small regions but medium established ones with long experience in short times! They are now a threat much more big and the security council needs to express shock and dismay as in the past.

Also we should encourage some people to join to defender regions due lack of defending compared to raiders groups
[_★_]_[' ]_
( -_-) (-_Q) If you understand that both Capitalism and Socialism have ideas that deserve merit, put this in your signature.
Card
We the Blueflarst empire know the philosophy of force. It is strength and it is victory.
“The care of nature and the environment is of ultimate importance. We cannot prosper- we cannot even survive- without a healthy, viable ecosystem to support us.”
“Violence is not an unnatural thing. It is the normal state of being.”
“Our game is a long game. We do not plan for the next year, or the next ten years, or the next budget cycle. We plan for eternity.”
"Knights are noble warriors that fight for right, not for personal gain. Peace will come to the galaxy only when evil has been vanquished"
Blueflarst ideological position: Fourth positionism

User avatar
Eumaeus
Attaché
 
Posts: 88
Founded: Jan 27, 2018
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Eumaeus » Thu May 02, 2019 6:29 am

For everyone else's convenience:
Acknowledging the fact of Black Hawks have two condemnations.
Seeing even more raids to medium regions from this menace.
Concerned about the lack of defenders compared to raiders in the world.

Seeing a dark threat to medium regions.
Concerned about their non stop growing as first raiders in the world

The Security council express shock and dismay to The Black Hawks and hereby condemns them.




Acknowledging the fact of that Black Hawks currently have two condemnations.

Some minor edits.
Seeing even more raids to medium regions from this menace.

I would just rewrite this sentence; it's a bit awkward.
Concerned about the lack of defenders compared to raiders in the world.

More like lack of effective defenders. Heyo! In all seriousness though, why is there a random double space between this clause and the next one?
Seeing a dark threat to medium regions.

Do you mean medium sized regions?
Concerned about their non-stop growth as first raiders in the world.

I'm trying to figure out what you're saying here. Is it that TBH are the number one raider region in the world? If so, the second part of this sentence desperately needs to be rephrased.
The Security Council expresses shock and dismay towards The Black Hawks and hereby condemns them.

Overall, it's lacking in substance and is not written particularly well. You could try adding in a list of "medium regions" that TBH have raided, and look into the organization's history since the last condemnation was written; surely there have been a few larger regions that have been invaded since then, and it would be worth including. There are more places you could do research, but checking out their thread in the gameplay forum would be a good start.
Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

"You ask my honorable name? My name is Nohbdy:
mother, father, and friends, everyone calls me Nohbdy."

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1785
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Thu May 02, 2019 10:47 am

Not really concerned about your motives.

Your current “attempt” lacks detail, substance and is very poorly written. The Hawks already have two Condemnations, you give absolutely no good reason for the SC awarding them a third.

If you’d posted your proposal here before submitting it, then it possibly could have been worked into something less embarrassing.
Last edited by Bhang Bhang Duc on Thu May 02, 2019 10:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Former Delegate and Guardian of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart

Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

User avatar
Borovan entered the region as he
Diplomat
 
Posts: 619
Founded: Dec 18, 2017
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Borovan entered the region as he » Thu May 02, 2019 11:16 am

1. Westphalia was founderless for a while and rhinia was created by the liamese empire if they still were in Westphalia it would be foolish since there was a good chance petain would cte again
2. People are ejected every week Why should raided natives be treated better?
3. They don't need 3 badges and condemning does almost nothing
Blueflarst wrote:Also we should encourage some people to join to defender regions due lack of defending compared to raiders groups

No
NPP - Politician Alastar Macdanieus

User avatar
Blueflarst
Envoy
 
Posts: 211
Founded: Aug 25, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blueflarst » Thu May 02, 2019 12:15 pm

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Not really concerned about your motives.

Your current “attempt” lacks detail, substance and is very poorly written. The Hawks already have two Condemnations, you give absolutely no good reason for the SC awarding them a third.

If you’d posted your proposal here before submitting it, then it possibly could have been worked into something less embarrassing.


this is not a badge but a condemn from the international security
[_★_]_[' ]_
( -_-) (-_Q) If you understand that both Capitalism and Socialism have ideas that deserve merit, put this in your signature.
Card
We the Blueflarst empire know the philosophy of force. It is strength and it is victory.
“The care of nature and the environment is of ultimate importance. We cannot prosper- we cannot even survive- without a healthy, viable ecosystem to support us.”
“Violence is not an unnatural thing. It is the normal state of being.”
“Our game is a long game. We do not plan for the next year, or the next ten years, or the next budget cycle. We plan for eternity.”
"Knights are noble warriors that fight for right, not for personal gain. Peace will come to the galaxy only when evil has been vanquished"
Blueflarst ideological position: Fourth positionism

User avatar
Bormiar
Attaché
 
Posts: 72
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bormiar » Thu May 02, 2019 12:44 pm

Blueflarst wrote:
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Not really concerned about your motives.

Your current “attempt” lacks detail, substance and is very poorly written. The Hawks already have two Condemnations, you give absolutely no good reason for the SC awarding them a third.

If you’d posted your proposal here before submitting it, then it possibly could have been worked into something less embarrassing.


this is not a badge but a condemn from the international security

“Security Council” is misleading. It doesn’t actually do anything other than give a badge. Because of that, it is actually a reward to condemn them, as their goal is to raid, a practice that if done consistently and notably, will usually be condemned. A condemnation, or 3, shows that they are incredible raiders. As Bhang Bhang Duc said, The Black Hawks don’t deserve a third condemnation.
Last edited by Bormiar on Thu May 02, 2019 12:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Wrapper
Senior Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 5906
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Wrapper » Thu May 02, 2019 3:55 pm

Blueflarst wrote:this is not a badge but a condemn from the international security

Which... is... literally just a badge. It certainly does nothing to change the condemned party's behavior.

User avatar
Bormiar
Attaché
 
Posts: 72
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bormiar » Thu May 02, 2019 4:44 pm

Wrapper wrote:
Blueflarst wrote:this is not a badge but a condemn from the international security

Which... is... literally just a badge. It certainly does nothing to change the condemned party's behavior.

Probably more likely helps the condemned region because new members will see it's condemned and think it's so much better than the others.

User avatar
Saint Louis City-State
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: May 01, 2019
New York Times Democracy

Postby Saint Louis City-State » Sat May 04, 2019 11:53 am

I'm all for condemning Chicago hockey teams!


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kenmoria

Advertisement

Remove ads