by Quincie » Sat Dec 29, 2018 4:15 am
by Wrapper » Sat Dec 29, 2018 6:28 am
by Aclion » Sat Dec 29, 2018 6:40 am
Wrapper wrote:“Sharia law”, particularly “radical Islamic sharia law” and the descriptions of what it allows, reads like a real-world reference. Unless you can prove otherwise, that would violate rule 4(a).
by Kaboomlandia » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:07 am
Quincie wrote:Wrapper wrote:“Sharia law”, particularly “radical Islamic sharia law” and the descriptions of what it allows, reads like a real-world reference. Unless you can prove otherwise, that would violate rule 4(a).
Sharia law is what I explained in the condemn. I don't really understand what you mean by "real world reference". Isn't the game inspired on real world collaboration and nations apart from a book?
by Frievolk » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:12 am
(But Al-Amin himself uses that term in his Factbooks and Personal canon too)Kaboomlandia wrote:Quincie wrote:
Sharia law is what I explained in the condemn. I don't really understand what you mean by "real world reference". Isn't the game inspired on real world collaboration and nations apart from a book?
You’re not allowed to reference the “real world” in proposals. You have to write the proposal as if NS was the real world and the actual real world doesn’t exist.
♔ The Frievolker Empire || Frievolker Kaiserreik ♔
♔ The Realm in the Sun || De Reik in de Sonne ♔
♔ Led by Kaiser Johann, Part of the Erstwelt ♔
Never forget that the Muslims literally made up a new meaningless name for him when they forgot the name of Adam's Firstborn.
by Frievolk » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:16 am
♔ The Frievolker Empire || Frievolker Kaiserreik ♔
♔ The Realm in the Sun || De Reik in de Sonne ♔
♔ Led by Kaiser Johann, Part of the Erstwelt ♔
Never forget that the Muslims literally made up a new meaningless name for him when they forgot the name of Adam's Firstborn.
by Likar » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:18 am
Frievolk wrote:Honestly, I'd probably vote in favor regardless of whether or not you take out the RL references (provided the mods would let it pass)
by Wrapper » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:26 am
Aclion wrote:Wrapper wrote:“Sharia law”, particularly “radical Islamic sharia law” and the descriptions of what it allows, reads like a real-world reference. Unless you can prove otherwise, that would violate rule 4(a).
How is it any different then a reference to common law? Or is the standard stricter in the SC?
(to go on a slight tangent why isn't Nazism/Stalinism a RL reference, being named after real people and political parties?)
by Wallenburg » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:30 am
by Wrapper » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:44 am
Quincie wrote:Problem, the caliphate refers to it as 'sharia law' and doesn't write more about it. So isn't it pretty logical that I picked the real life definition of it? I mean, what would the other definition possibly be!?
by Wrapper » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:51 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement