NationStates

The Security Council,

NOTING that La Navasse has authored four resolutions for the Security Council;

SHOCKED that La Navasse has authored these resolutions not within the interests of the Security Council, but rather to be credited as the author of the resolutions;

DISGUSTED at this practise of abusing the Security Council for the purpose of getting a status boost;

DISMAYED that La Navasse has proudly supported a ridiculous trend to liberate foundered regions, and still attempts do so. Examples of these resolutions are:

SC#263, "Liberate Confederation of Corrupt Dictators", a region with an active founder and nations with over 100 endorsements, rendering it almost impossible to raid in the unlikely event that the founder ceases to exist;
SC#245, "Liberate KAISERREICH", a region while distasteful, has a founder who are active and show no signs of ceasing to exist soon;
SC#246, "Liberate Nazi Europa", a resolution authored by none other than La Navasse, and the region's founder is administrated by multiple active nations in Nazi Europa, making it near-impossible for the founder to cease to exist;

DISAPPROVING of La Navasse's resolutions and drafted resolutions, which have made a mockery out of the Security Council;

SC#205, "Liberate Dank Memes", a region that collapsed due to the carelessness of La Navasse by trying to coup the region with a puppet state;
Yet again SC#246, which states Nazi Europa's interference in Dank Memes, interference that was called upon by La Navasse themselves;
Drafting "Liberate USSD", a proposal to liberate the region not for the region to be raided, but to "reprimand" the region, therefore abusing the power of removing Delegate-imposed barriers from the region just to tell them off for "adopting Stalinism";

REPULSED by La Navasse's shameful activity in the Security Council by cluttering it up with useless resolutions;

HOPING that an official condemnation by the Security Council will tell La Navasse and other authors to author proper, meaningful resolutions in the interests of the Security Council and the greater good, not in the interests of themselves;

HEREBY CONDEMNS LA NAVASSE.

Any thoughts? I think he most definitely deserves it.

Nope. La Navasse deserves to be laughed at, not given more publicity.

Fauxia wrote:Nope. La Navasse deserves to be laughed at, not given more publicity.

It'll give him negative publicity. He probably won't take it as a badge of honour, because he believes what he is doing is good.

Honeydewistania wrote:

Fauxia wrote:Nope. La Navasse deserves to be laughed at, not given more publicity.

It'll give him negative publicity. He probably won't take it as a badge of honour, because he believes what he is doing is good.

Nope. He'd want the badge. Just ignore him.

Zyonnism wrote:

Honeydewistania wrote:It'll give him negative publicity. He probably won't take it as a badge of honour, because he believes what he is doing is good.

Nope. He'd want the badge. Just ignore him.

He says he is proud to write offensive libs. I'd be thinking he'd not want a resolution that tells him otherwise, and also that he is collecting badges.

Against. La Navasse doesn't deserve recognition from the SC yet.

Edit: The CCD liberation was authored by Lord Dominator and the Kaiserreich liberation was authored by me, not La Navasse.

Edit edit: Oh, and also he didn't start the trend. I did. But unlike him I stopped with Kreich because I knew it'd be stupid to do any more than that.

Stop giving him free publicity. Is this chamber ever going to learn how to ignore attention seekers?

Nah. Badgehunting and being generally annoying doesn't warrant this kind of recognition by the WA.

Against. Lanav deserves no recognition for badgehunting.

Honeydewistania wrote:

Fauxia wrote:Nope. La Navasse deserves to be laughed at, not given more publicity.

It'll give him negative publicity. He probably won't take it as a badge of honour, because he believes what he is doing is good.

That’s a... bad rebuttal. Ever heard of the saying “any publicity is good still some publicity”?

You say he won’t take it as a badge of honour, which unfortunately many condemned regions and nations have been known to do, yet also you can make no guarantee of this. For all you know, he can take it as a badge of honour for literally no other reason but to spite you, which people on this game will do quite willingly. Anyhow, against.

Instead of piling on, I’ll just note that “account” in this context violates Rule 4.

Kuriko wrote:Against. La Navasse doesn't deserve recognition from the SC yet.

Edit: The CCD liberation was authored by Lord Dominator and the Kaiserreich liberation was authored by me, not La Navasse.

Edit edit: Oh, and also he didn't start the trend. I did. But unlike him I stopped with Kreich because I knew it'd be stupid to do any more than that.

I didn't say that La Navasse authored them. (Also, I'll just edit that to say that he proudly supports the trend and continue to push these resolutions.)

Wrapper wrote:Instead of piling on, I’ll just note that “account” in this context violates Rule 4.

authored those.
Fixed.

And to those who say 'he doesn't deserve recognition for badgehunting", he's already GOT the badges. He's already got publicity (which is pretty negative, in the fist place). He can't be proud of a resolution by the council that he authors resolution for to condemn him for writing resolutions. And if HE is proud of a condemnation that tells him that he hunts badges and is irritating just to get back at me, he must be a pretty big fool.

Honeydewistania wrote:

Fauxia wrote:Nope. La Navasse deserves to be laughed at, not given more publicity.

It'll give him negative publicity. He probably won't take it as a badge of honour, because he believes what he is doing is good.

You don't know how it works around here. People like this do everything they can to get condemned.

Most definitely against

Against. It’s pretty known at this point that I don’t like the guy, but he doesn’t deserve a badge for being a bad author.

Against.

"It would be much better to give La Navasse some stern advice rather than a condemnation. As my colleagues have already stated, it will simply bring attention to him, despite the fact that he is simply only a bad author."

Im for this in a way, but it is giving him publicity nonetheless, the moron needs to be ignored

We should establish a region called La Navasse and liberate it. In fact, I may just do that.

I'm opposed to this, but also think we need to be a bit less harsh in this thread.

United Massachusetts wrote:We should establish a region called La Navasse and liberate it. In fact, I may just do that.

I'm opposed to this, but also think we need to be a bit less harsh in this thread.

On it.

United Massachusetts wrote:We should establish a region called La Navasse and liberate it. In fact, I may just do that.

I'm opposed to this, but also think we need to be a bit less harsh in this thread.

And then fill it with stuff about waiting for the founder to CTE, but then never actually having the founder CTE? Would be about as useful as Liberate NE.

Chricoma wrote:Im for this in a way, but it is giving him publicity nonetheless, the moron needs to be ignored

Emphasis mine.

Ad hominem attacks on other users on this site are considered flaming. Please don't do that.

Cheers,

Audio

Well this hasn't gone well.
I'll probably drop it, but only after I see La Navasse's reaction.
And I'm open to writing a Liberation of La Navasse

As easy as it is to laugh at things LN does sometimes...

I'll give him credit, he's a fast worker and he's involved and I'm sure he legitimately cares about this community. Yeah I don't agree with everything he does but that doesn't make him worthy of a condemn.

So no, I'm not going to support this.