Advertisement
by Unibot III » Wed Dec 26, 2018 11:24 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Lord Dominator » Wed Dec 26, 2018 12:05 pm
Unibot III wrote:I'll support a liberation if the occupation intensifies and the intent appears to be to grief/destroy the region (and subsequently, the WA Liberation becomes necessary). I remember the good old days with Jenrak et. al. I think the anti-NPO coalition lacks a moral leg to stand on if it criticizes NPO's forced isolation of Topid from St Abbaddon and yet pursues the same goal militarily with Feux/Milo in Azhukali.
by The Fishy Mongerer » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:18 pm
Yokiria wrote:This latest iteration of Azhukali was refounded and mostly controlled by disgraced NPOers. It is currently controlled by the APC. Liberating it would only succeed in permanently making it a defacto Warzone between the NPO and the APC, with neither able to ever truly secure the region.
by A mean old man » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:31 pm
by Yokiria » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:43 pm
The Fishy Mongerer wrote:im not saying thats what would happen but these are raiders so i cant be blamed for being pestimistic about the intentions other then the feux thing.
A mean old man wrote:The intentions are to drum up activity within their orgs and toot their own horns while adhering to a currently- (and likely transiently-) popular narrative.
by A mean old man » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:49 pm
by Yokiria » Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:02 pm
by Flanderlion » Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:27 pm
by Lord Dominator » Wed Dec 26, 2018 4:24 pm
by Yokiria » Wed Dec 26, 2018 6:40 pm
Flanderlion wrote:It really looks like an open and shut raid on a founderless RP region with a long history to me. The participants are mostly raiders. Embassies with other RP regions are being shut while embassies with the raiding regions are being opened. I'm not sure how it isn't a normal raid?
by The Fishy Mongerer » Wed Dec 26, 2018 7:13 pm
Lord Dominator wrote:As far as I know it's more about doing stuff to Feux for his actions than the NPO (not that he probably cares, but whatever).
by Yokiria » Wed Dec 26, 2018 7:30 pm
by The Fishy Mongerer » Wed Dec 26, 2018 8:20 pm
Yokiria wrote:Typing in all-lowercase, run-on sentences is an interesting way to make yourself seem like a new player and native, rather than a puppet account of an NPOer.
Writing a high-quality dispatch using logs and references that refer to events both older than your founding date and involving Milo and Feux makes you seem like a puppet account of an NPOer.
by Marilyn Manson Freaks » Wed Dec 26, 2018 8:29 pm
by Unibot III » Thu Dec 27, 2018 1:21 am
Lord Dominator wrote:Unibot III wrote:I'll support a liberation if the occupation intensifies and the intent appears to be to grief/destroy the region (and subsequently, the WA Liberation becomes necessary). I remember the good old days with Jenrak et. al. I think the anti-NPO coalition lacks a moral leg to stand on if it criticizes NPO's forced isolation of Topid from St Abbaddon and yet pursues the same goal militarily with Feux/Milo in Azhukali.
Yep, Feux's situation with his actions against a number of the regions involved is totally the same as Topid's (Milo, being DoS is irrelevant here). Totally.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Lord Dominator » Thu Dec 27, 2018 1:22 am
Unibot III wrote:Lord Dominator wrote:Yep, Feux's situation with his actions against a number of the regions involved is totally the same as Topid's (Milo, being DoS is irrelevant here). Totally.
Both have sought to undermine a major game power. Deploying a battalion to force the region’s hand into isolating the individual seems like equatable acts of gunboat diplomacy.
by Unibot III » Thu Dec 27, 2018 1:55 am
Lord Dominator wrote:Unibot III wrote:
Both have sought to undermine a major game power. Deploying a battalion to force the region’s hand into isolating the individual seems like equatable acts of gunboat diplomacy.
Topid making a joke on a similarly named region's WFE is now 'undermining a major game power' ?
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Pierconium » Thu Dec 27, 2018 2:04 am
Yokiria wrote:Typing in all-lowercase, run-on sentences is an interesting way to make yourself seem like a new player and native, rather than a puppet account of an NPOer.
Writing a high-quality dispatch using logs and references that refer to events both older than your founding date and involving Milo and Feux makes you seem like a puppet account of an NPOer.
by Drop Your Pants » Thu Dec 27, 2018 2:41 am
Pierconium wrote:So any nation that was once part of the historical ‘NPO plots’ is now considered an ‘NPOer’ for life? It seems like several within your groups leadership structure might have an issue with this position.
by Pierconium » Thu Dec 27, 2018 2:54 am
Drop Your Pants wrote:Pierconium wrote:So any nation that was once part of the historical ‘NPO plots’ is now considered an ‘NPOer’ for life? It seems like several within your groups leadership structure might have an issue with this position.
Obviously they'll cherry pick their targets to ones that they can win and not cause massive blowback on themselves. And have excuses lined up for the others.
by Yokiria » Thu Dec 27, 2018 3:27 am
Pierconium wrote:So any nation that was once part of the historical ‘NPO plots’ is now considered an ‘NPOer’ for life? It seems like several within your groups leadership structure might have an issue with this position.
Pierconium wrote:Drop Your Pants wrote:Obviously they'll cherry pick their targets to ones that they can win and not cause massive blowback on themselves. And have excuses lined up for the others.
What?! I’m appalled.
Are you telling me that these people would do something hypocritical? I don’t believe it. They are all such upstanding individuals who have never compromised their supposed values in the name of ambition. Surely you jest?
by Drop Your Pants » Thu Dec 27, 2018 3:42 am
Yokiria wrote:I am sorry to interrupt the circlejerk, but...
by Yokiria » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:06 am
by Drop Your Pants » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:35 am
Yokiria wrote:While the easier method would be for Pierconium and you to stop building a two-man echo-chamber in the middle of NPO-related threads, I will oblige.
The next time you two start up, I will call it something less vulgar but with similar meaning.
by Jar Wattinree » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:43 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement