NationStates

Description: The Security Council,

Regretting that this repeal proposal must even exist.

Observing Solorni's sudden resignation of the position of Queen of Balder, a title they held for half a decade, after confessing to heinous crimes against the community they are Commended for serving.

Disgusted by Solorni's gathering of unique support to their causes in Balder being found by subsequent investigation to be from the exploitation of at-risk nations in the region.

Disturbed by the discovery that the reign of Solorni in Balder was built through the exploitation of these at-risk nations.

Noting that the original Commendation references Solorni's contributions to the security and stability of Balder, when Solorni has been exposed as the chief security threat, rather than the chief security administrator they were upheld to be.

Knowing that the original Commendation references Solorni's previously beloved residency in Europeia.

Revealing the fact the subsequent investigation, by which the information in this Repeal has been based upon, is an investigation from the Europeia security team that once trusted Solorni immensely.

Dismissing the original Commendation's claim of Solorni being a world-renowned diplomat as no longer relevant, based on the fact they are being summarily exiled from all the regions they negotiated treaties with during their career.

Saddened that a nation revered for their leadership, community building, and outreach on critical social issues has now been exposed for deep corruption.

Aware of what we must do in response.

Hereby Repeals SC#252 Commend Solorni

Yokiria wrote:Noting that the original Commendation references Solorni's contributions to the security and stability of Balder, when Solorni has been exposed as the chief security threat, rather than the chief security administrator they were upheld to be.

Reventus Koth wrote:Balder has not existed for a decade, nor has Rach been Queen of it for that long. With only one 180 (I think) day interruption where NES held the delegacy, she was delegate for 5 years and 250 days.

Alvalero wrote:

Reventus Koth wrote:Balder has not existed for a decade, nor has Rach been Queen of it for that long. With only one 180 (I think) day interruption where NES held the delegacy, she was delegate for 5 years and 250 days.

You're close. 5 years and 61 days with a gap of 188 days after the first 281.

Reventus Koth wrote:

Alvalero wrote:You're close. 5 years and 61 days with a gap of 188 days after the first 281.

Blah, sorry. Was trying to cite exact numbers from memory. But yeah, definitely not a decade!

Tim-Opolis wrote:As soon as the factual innacuracies of the length of her Balder tenure are fixed, I support.

No way to justify keeping this on the books, after what we saw.

Reventus Koth wrote:Balder has not existed for a decade, nor has Rach been Queen of it for that long. With only one 180 (I think) day interruption where NES held the delegacy, she was delegate for 5 years and 250 days.

Kranostav wrote:You seem to be laying ground work that could lead to a subsequent condemnation as well. Is that your intention or should we end this unfortunate string of events at this repeal?

Lord Dominator wrote:You mean of the target, not the author Kuriko, lol

Support of course

Kranostav wrote:You seem to be laying ground work that could lead to a subsequent condemnation as well. Is that your intention or should we end this unfortunate string of events at this repeal?

Yokiria wrote:

Kranostav wrote:You seem to be laying ground work that could lead to a subsequent condemnation as well. Is that your intention or should we end this unfortunate string of events at this repeal?

I only want to repeal the Commendation. I do not want to Condemn Solorni.

Kostrorleauny wrote:

Yokiria wrote:
I only want to repeal the Commendation. I do not want to Condemn Solorni.

Good call, I woudn’t bother with a condemnation proposal.

But yes, I agree with most everyone else here. The actions undertaken by Solorni out-of-character that we now have been made aware of far outshadow her achievements in-character that she was commended for. With this knowledge in hand, we cannot allow her to remain commended as that would set bad precedent.