Eh. Okay. I think I’ll write my initial response to this now. I’ll admit, you can write better than Crimsonfield did. Unfortunately, this proposal is just as flawed, if not more, than Crimsonfield’s, and based upon the same evidence and claims as he used.. Okay.
”Repulsed by the rampant proliferation of flagrant homophobic and racist commentary within the Federation’s internal discussion;”
I’m assuming you’re using the same evidence as Crimsonfield has? I stood by my word and halted usage of such language: I’ve already banned a person or two (permanently) for thinking they can use racist language and stay. Nevertheless, the clause implies present tense, and again, I need to remind you that we’ve taken the hint by the last proposal and fixed up things...Despite them already being fixed up to 2 months before that proposal.
”Disgusted by KAISERREICH involvement in the Federation’s deceitfully named military Army of Freedom, especially considering the prior fascist promoting actions that KAISERREICH has done;
Sickened by the Federation’s military assistance of KAISERREICH in an invasion on The Commie Confederacy;”
Deceitfully named Army of Freedom? Deceitfully named? Honestly, how dare you.
We haven’t had any aid from KAISERREICH in months, nor have we aided them in that time. I don’t remember when TCC occurred, but if I recall correctly, it was during Crimsonfield’s Secretary of War term. Either way, we do not view KAISERREICH as fascists, as we’ve never been presented with evidence that they are, and from all we’ve seen they are not. As such, I fail to see the wrong in aiding them in the future or the present.
”Disappointed at the Federation’s Founder for vehemently rejecting claims brought upon him in a previous Liberation proposal against his region in an attempt to smear and spin the truth;”
Alright. You can be disappointed in my defense of myself and my statements about my region all you want. That’s fine. I draw the line when you accuse me of “smear(ing) and spin(ning) the truth, however. I cannot see where I ever did such a thing, and I haven’t smeared the truth whatsoever. Speaking of which, what do you think is “the truth”? That’d probably help me argue better against this claim.
”Believing that the Federation never made a wholehearted effort to rid itself of its hateful & toxic behavior, instead only guarding itself from public scrutiny and creating public relations theatrics;”
Hateful and toxic behavior. Honestly, did you just get bored and weren’t able to write another clause so you threw in “hateful and toxic”? Nevertheless, under mine and New Waldensia’s terms as President, we’ve both taken a harsh stance on racist language etc. I’ve already apologized several times for my rather irrational behavior several months ago, and I cringe when I go back and think about myself several months ago...Ugh.
”Nauseated by the region's false self-portrayal as "Conservative" while they secretly support fascism and stigmatization of minorities;”
How so? Honestly, I am insulted and repulsed that you’ve continued Crimsonfield’s disgusting ways of calling us fascists and claiming we’re fake conservatives. Look at our nation’s, and go back through our region’s history! Hell, our armed forces is literally based upon the basic democratic rights of freedom and is thus called the Army of Freedom! We fight for freedom, which isn’t compatible with fascism! Again, Ugh.
”Intending to discourage other regions from pursuing the Federation’s path and properly punish the Federation for its actions;”
Noble intentions. I don’t see anything wrong with the “Federation’s path” though. In fact, despite our, uh, environment several months ago between a few members, I still smile and look back at our old days, and how far we’ve come from our founding.
EDIT: Could you please elaborate on “Gagium and Co.”?