by Concrete Slab » Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:56 pm
by Borovan entered the region as he » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:00 pm
Concrete Slab wrote:NOTICING the region of Macedon deserves its latest condemnation due to the wrongs it has inflicted.
BELIEVING, however, TWO condemnations is absurd for a region that has, as well as its allies, ceased to exist.
APPLAUDING Kuriko for showing the entity of NationStates the evil Macedon has inflicted.
BELIEVING his resolution goes much more in-depth about why Macedon deserves a condemnation.
FURTHER BELIEVING two condemnations only serve to give the region more attention.
UNDERSTANDING the resolution is no longer needed
HEREBY repeals "Condemn Macedon"
Tel me what you guys think!
by Kaboomlandia » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:08 pm
by Milozoldyck » Mon Dec 10, 2018 10:37 am
by Drop Your Pants » Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:00 pm
Kaboomlandia wrote:I’m pretty sure Kuriko already plans to get rid of the shitty first condemnation and has something drafted for it, so this isn’t really necessary.
Kuriko wrote:As I said over discord, I hereby release this draft and its content to Praetor of The North Pacific. They may do with this draft as they will, which hopefully entails submitting it to the SC and putting it to vote
by The Gilded Star » Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:25 pm
by Kaboomlandia » Tue Dec 11, 2018 10:10 am
The Gilded Star wrote:I wonder if there'd be enough support to repeal the recently passed condemnation in favor of preserving the historical one instead. Probably not, but this entire situation feels like it's been a mess.
by Kuriko » Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:00 pm
Kaboomlandia wrote:The Gilded Star wrote:I wonder if there'd be enough support to repeal the recently passed condemnation in favor of preserving the historical one instead. Probably not, but this entire situation feels like it's been a mess.
The new condemn passed because the old one was terribly written. There’s no point preserving it now that a better one has passed.
by The Gilded Star » Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:41 pm
Kaboomlandia wrote:The new condemn passed because the old one was terribly written. There’s no point preserving it now that a better one has passed.
by Wallenburg » Fri Dec 14, 2018 11:57 am
Concrete Slab wrote:Believing two condemnations is illogical for a region that, as well as its allies, is no longer active.
Acknowledging Kuriko condemnation of Macedon in SC #269 goes much further in depth about why Macedon deserves a condemnation.
by Borovan entered the region as he » Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:01 pm
Wallenburg wrote:Concrete Slab wrote:Believing two condemnations is illogical for a region that, as well as its allies, is no longer active.
This is a hypocritical argument when one of the coauthors wrote the second, "illogical" condemnation. I suggest you remove it.Acknowledging Kuriko condemnation of Macedon in SC #269 goes much further in depth about why Macedon deserves a condemnation.
Kuriko needs an " 's " there.
by The Church of Satan » Fri Dec 14, 2018 1:11 pm
by Jakker » Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:34 pm
The Bruce wrote:Mostly I feel sorry for [raiders], because they put in all this effort and at the end of the day have nothing to show for it and have created nothing.
by Palsada » Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:25 pm
Jakker wrote:It's going to be really sad if this passes. Don't buy the argument that repealing a proposal doesn't remove it from history. If we want to give Macedon two condemnations, that feels more appropriate than repealing the very first proposal of the SC. Removing historical content simply because the proposal doesn't match the standards of today is beyond silly.
by Yokiria » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:54 pm
by South World » Tue Dec 18, 2018 5:23 am
by Wittebosland » Tue Dec 18, 2018 6:04 am
by Strong union state » Tue Dec 18, 2018 7:20 am
by Kuriko » Tue Dec 18, 2018 7:24 am
Strong union state wrote:You people who want a repeal of condemn Macedona disgust me it is stupid!
by Kilkerneys Landing » Tue Dec 18, 2018 8:01 am
by Strong union state » Tue Dec 18, 2018 1:02 pm
Kuriko wrote:Strong union state wrote:You people who want a repeal of condemn Macedon disgust me it is stupid!
You're a nation of 50 million pop, want to explain a little more clearly why you don't want it repealed if you just started playing this game? And its Macedon, not Macedon. Also, there's a new condemnation on the books anyways.
by Flanderlion » Tue Dec 18, 2018 1:23 pm
South World wrote:Believing two condemnations is illogical for a region that, as well as its allies, is no longer active.
If the region and its allies are non longer active, why are we wasting time on this? Opposed
by Yokiria » Tue Dec 18, 2018 1:27 pm
Flanderlion wrote:I don't really understand why people even want to repeal it, it's like destroying the old cave drawings because they aren't relevant anymore.
Wittebosland wrote:I can't quite understand why people are hesitant to remove the old resolution on grounds of seniority. That's the bloody point of a flexible law system, so that the new can advance beyond the old!
by Kuriko » Tue Dec 18, 2018 2:01 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement