NationStates

Mryasia wrote:

Quantipapa wrote:
Give me more. I will fold it in.

You do literally realize that N-Day doesn't affect anything except production, which is used for shields and Nukes

I unliterally realize that there is a sadistic morality behind the way they nuke their enemies into oblivion.

Quantipapa wrote:

Mryasia wrote:You do literally realize that N-Day doesn't affect anything except production, which is used for shields and Nukes

I unliterally realize that there is a sadistic morality behind the way they nuke their enemies into oblivion.

We were farming points.

Quantipapa wrote:

Mryasia wrote:You do literally realize that N-Day doesn't affect anything except production, which is used for shields and Nukes

I unliterally realize that there is a sadistic morality behind the way they nuke their enemies into oblivion.

I would maybe, maybe, understand condemning North Pacific on the basis of N-day if the destruction was permanent. But it just isn't. It is a non-issue. After N-day is over every year, everything is reset to a state as if it never happened. Nations aren't permanently destroyed.

The New California Republic wrote:

Quantipapa wrote:
I unliterally realize that there is a sadistic morality behind the way they nuke their enemies into oblivion.

I would maybe, maybe, understand condemning North Pacific on the basis of N-day if the destruction was permanent. But it just isn't. It is a non-issue. After N-day is over every year, everything is reset to a state as if it never happened. Nations aren't permanently destroyed.

Your opinion is noted

No.

/thead

Anarchitaria wrote:No.

/thead

No? What an unproductive comment.

Write a draft proposal and then people will give you productive comments.

Quantipapa wrote:

Anarchitaria wrote:No.

/thead

No? What an unproductive comment.

You haven't given us much to work from in the first place, which explains the short responses.

Since there is no change on your part, I have no choice but to submit a warning to you through the hallowed halls of the security council.

Amerieka wrote:Since there is no change on your part, I have no choice but to submit a warning to you through the hallowed halls of the security council.

That's a stupid thing to do

Lord Dominator wrote:

Amerieka wrote:Since there is no change on your part, I have no choice but to submit a warning to you through the hallowed halls of the security council.

That's a stupid thing to do

Thank you

Quantipapa wrote:Thank you

So you're obviously online and you've seen this topic. Can we expect a draft proposal? Bear in mind you won't be able to get someone else to write it for you judging by the lack of support so far.

For a second I thought there has been something truly serious happening in TNP to make them worthy of a condemnation, I don't know, a coup, a raid or something.
I am disappointed.

Isilanka wrote:For a second I thought there has been something truly serious happening in TNP to make them worthy of a condemnation, I don't know, a coup, a raid or something.
I am disappointed.

I expected a bad proposal based on the topic alone

Anyway, we shouldn't condemn (or commend for that matter) anyone for their actions during N-day. Against.

Isilanka wrote:For a second I thought there has been something truly serious happening in TNP to make them worthy of a condemnation, I don't know, a coup, a raid or something.
I am disappointed.

The reason given for condemning them (N-day) is just stupid. Based on that logic, any WA member nation that launched nukes on N-day should be condemned. Completely absurd and entirely without merit.

Did TNP cheer at the destruction of human life any more than any other region? Anyway, TNP has done so much good that it can't really be condemned in my opinion.

If you are going to condemn the largest region in the world of NationStates, you better have one hell of a proposal.

Fecaw wrote:Did TNP cheer at the destruction of human life any more than any other region? Anyway, TNP has done so much good that it can't really be condemned in my opinion.

If anything, if N-day is the reason for the condemnation, then it'd be far more justifiable (relatively speaking of course, as I still think this entire thing is ridiculous) to go after those individual nations that constitute the leadership of UPPERCUT.

The New California Republic wrote:

Isilanka wrote:For a second I thought there has been something truly serious happening in TNP to make them worthy of a condemnation, I don't know, a coup, a raid or something.
I am disappointed.

The reason given for condemning them (N-day) is just stupid. Based on that logic, any WA member nation that launched nukes on N-day should be condemned. Completely absurd and entirely without merit.

Well, if N-Day had any real consequences besides pride for the winner, they might had a point, and I could see a condemnation based on, say, a region betraying an alliance or whatever. Given it's just a "mini-game" of sorts without any consequence whatsoever it's silly.

Isilanka wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:The reason given for condemning them (N-day) is just stupid. Based on that logic, any WA member nation that launched nukes on N-day should be condemned. Completely absurd and entirely without merit.

Well, if N-Day had any real consequences besides pride for the winner, they might had a point, and I could see a condemnation based on, say, a region betraying an alliance or whatever. Given it's just a "mini-game" of sorts without any consequence whatsoever it's silly.

I'm ready for the Z-Day Condemnations.

Jar Wattinree wrote:

Isilanka wrote:
Well, if N-Day had any real consequences besides pride for the winner, they might had a point, and I could see a condemnation based on, say, a region betraying an alliance or whatever. Given it's just a "mini-game" of sorts without any consequence whatsoever it's silly.

I'm ready for the Z-Day Condemnations.

Jar Wattinree wrote:

Isilanka wrote:
Well, if N-Day had any real consequences besides pride for the winner, they might had a point, and I could see a condemnation based on, say, a region betraying an alliance or whatever. Given it's just a "mini-game" of sorts without any consequence whatsoever it's silly.

I'm ready for the Z-Day Condemnations.

APPALLED at the flagrant use of cure missiles, showing zero respect for the national sovereignty of the Zombie peoples...

Caracasus wrote:

Jar Wattinree wrote:I'm ready for the Z-Day Condemnations.

APPALLED at the flagrant use of cure missiles, showing zero respect for the national sovereignty of the Zombie peoples...

SHOCKED by this flagrant violation of zombie rights...

Fecaw wrote:

Caracasus wrote:
APPALLED at the flagrant use of cure missiles, showing zero respect for the national sovereignty of the Zombie peoples...

SHOCKED by this flagrant violation of zombie rights...

BITTEN by the abhorrent violence towards zombies...

Valentine Z wrote:

Fecaw wrote:SHOCKED by this flagrant violation of zombie rights...

BITTEN by the abhorrent violence towards zombies...

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the zombie's merciless and endless desire to eat our brains...