[DRAFT] Condemn Hell

[Cosmopolitan borovan]

Gameplay is dying and I believe its directly correlated to the social game being valued above creating content. I understand that standing for something is no longer fashionable, but this is a hill I'm willing to die on. I hope my fellow grumpy codgers stand on this hill with me. Our geopolitical struggle is being replaced by a thinly veiled meta that resembles social media culture.

So. Much. This.

I like Hell and its Delegate, but I'm against this proposal. Something in this game has to actually still be based on gameplay and not just socializing.

Let's ban socializing. Socializing is bad

[Marilyn Manson Freaks]

Wtf did I just read?

[Thatcher Whitehall]

Wtf did I just read?

Well established members of the WASC community are asking you not to move forward with this, Manson.

[Malphe]

Wtf did I just read?

Well established members of the WASC community are asking you not to move forward with this, Manson.

I can feel the passive aggression from here!

[Lord Dominator]

Well established members of the WASC community are asking you not to move forward with this, Manson.

I can feel the passive aggression from here!

And the active aggression!

[Thatcher Whitehall]

Well established members of the WASC community are asking you not to move forward with this, Manson.

I can feel the passive aggression from here!

Manson asked a question and I answered it. I am not angry about this issue—I am concerned for the future of this institution.

[Consular]

They did earlier this morning, hence my post here.

Lol, this is why people don't like NS. For once, don't take the game so seriously.

Y'know, there are many reasons I dislike NS. People wanting you to not submit unworthy resolutions isn't one of them though.

[Marilyn Manson Freaks]

Lol, this is why people don't like NS. For once, don't take the game so seriously.

Y'know, there are many reasons I dislike NS. People wanting you to not submit unworthy resolutions isn't one of them though.

What you consider worthy is different from what others do.

[Consular]

Y'know, there are many reasons I dislike NS. People wanting you to not submit unworthy resolutions isn't one of them though.

What you consider worthy is different from what others do.

Sure, that's a given. The point was that opposition to Security Council resolutions isn't "why people don't like NS"

[United Massachusetts]

What you consider worthy is different from what others do.

Sure, that's a given. The point was that opposition to Security Council resolutions isn't "why people don't like NS"

I'm not convinced that this resolution is somehow an affront to the SC, particularly when doing so on a highly notable target. If anything, this will spawn new SC activity and creativity. The SC is dull and boring, and hardly active. It needs to (a) have fun and (b) be creative sometimes.

I think the target was worthy of a commend, and it was worthy of a condemn. I see no reason to deny them of these.